Cargando…
Embodiment in 18th Century Depictions of Human-Machine Co-Creativity
Artificial intelligence has a rich history in literature; fiction has shaped how we view artificial agents and their capacities in the real world. This paper looks at embodied examples of human-machine co-creation from the literature of the Long 18th Century (1,650–1,850), examining how older depict...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.662036 |
_version_ | 1783721330918555648 |
---|---|
author | Kantosalo, Anna Falk, Michael Jordanous, Anna |
author_facet | Kantosalo, Anna Falk, Michael Jordanous, Anna |
author_sort | Kantosalo, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Artificial intelligence has a rich history in literature; fiction has shaped how we view artificial agents and their capacities in the real world. This paper looks at embodied examples of human-machine co-creation from the literature of the Long 18th Century (1,650–1,850), examining how older depictions of creative machines could inform and inspire modern day research. The works are analyzed from the perspective of design fiction with special focus on the embodiment of the systems and the creativity exhibited by them. We find that the chosen examples highlight the importance of recognizing the environment as a major factor in human-machine co-creative processes and that some of the works seem to precede current examples of artificial systems reaching into our everyday lives. The examples present embodied interaction in a positive, creativity-oriented way, but also highlight ethical risks of human-machine co-creativity. Modern day perceptions of artificial systems and creativity can be limited to some extent by the technologies available; fictitious examples from centuries past allow us to examine such limitations using a Design Fiction approach. We conclude by deriving four guidelines for future research from our fictional examples: 1) explore unlikely embodiments; 2) think of situations, not systems; 3) be aware of the disjunction between action and appearance; and 4) consider the system as a situated moral agent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8273262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82732622021-07-13 Embodiment in 18th Century Depictions of Human-Machine Co-Creativity Kantosalo, Anna Falk, Michael Jordanous, Anna Front Robot AI Robotics and AI Artificial intelligence has a rich history in literature; fiction has shaped how we view artificial agents and their capacities in the real world. This paper looks at embodied examples of human-machine co-creation from the literature of the Long 18th Century (1,650–1,850), examining how older depictions of creative machines could inform and inspire modern day research. The works are analyzed from the perspective of design fiction with special focus on the embodiment of the systems and the creativity exhibited by them. We find that the chosen examples highlight the importance of recognizing the environment as a major factor in human-machine co-creative processes and that some of the works seem to precede current examples of artificial systems reaching into our everyday lives. The examples present embodied interaction in a positive, creativity-oriented way, but also highlight ethical risks of human-machine co-creativity. Modern day perceptions of artificial systems and creativity can be limited to some extent by the technologies available; fictitious examples from centuries past allow us to examine such limitations using a Design Fiction approach. We conclude by deriving four guidelines for future research from our fictional examples: 1) explore unlikely embodiments; 2) think of situations, not systems; 3) be aware of the disjunction between action and appearance; and 4) consider the system as a situated moral agent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8273262/ /pubmed/34262945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.662036 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kantosalo, Falk and Jordanous. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Robotics and AI Kantosalo, Anna Falk, Michael Jordanous, Anna Embodiment in 18th Century Depictions of Human-Machine Co-Creativity |
title | Embodiment in 18th Century Depictions of Human-Machine Co-Creativity |
title_full | Embodiment in 18th Century Depictions of Human-Machine Co-Creativity |
title_fullStr | Embodiment in 18th Century Depictions of Human-Machine Co-Creativity |
title_full_unstemmed | Embodiment in 18th Century Depictions of Human-Machine Co-Creativity |
title_short | Embodiment in 18th Century Depictions of Human-Machine Co-Creativity |
title_sort | embodiment in 18th century depictions of human-machine co-creativity |
topic | Robotics and AI |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.662036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kantosaloanna embodimentin18thcenturydepictionsofhumanmachinecocreativity AT falkmichael embodimentin18thcenturydepictionsofhumanmachinecocreativity AT jordanousanna embodimentin18thcenturydepictionsofhumanmachinecocreativity |