Cargando…

Measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey

OBJECTIVE: Even as genomic medicine is implemented globally, there remains a lack of rigorous, national assessments of physicians’ current genomic practice and continuing genomics education needs. The aim of this study was to address this gap. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey, informed by qualitativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nisselle, Amy, King, Emily A, McClaren, Belinda, Janinski, Monika, Metcalfe, Sylvia, Gaff, Clara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044408
_version_ 1783721375510298624
author Nisselle, Amy
King, Emily A
McClaren, Belinda
Janinski, Monika
Metcalfe, Sylvia
Gaff, Clara
author_facet Nisselle, Amy
King, Emily A
McClaren, Belinda
Janinski, Monika
Metcalfe, Sylvia
Gaff, Clara
author_sort Nisselle, Amy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Even as genomic medicine is implemented globally, there remains a lack of rigorous, national assessments of physicians’ current genomic practice and continuing genomics education needs. The aim of this study was to address this gap. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey, informed by qualitative data and behaviour change theory, to assess the current landscape of Australian physicians’ genomic medicine practice, perceptions of proximity and individual preparedness, and preferred models of practice and continuing education. The survey was advertised nationally through 10 medical colleges, 24 societies, 62 hospitals, social media, professional networks and snowballing. RESULTS: 409 medical specialists across Australia responded, representing 30 specialties (majority paediatricians, 20%), from mainly public hospitals (70%) in metropolitan areas (75%). Half (53%) had contacted their local genetics services and half (54%) had ordered or referred for a gene panel or exome/genome sequencing test in the last year. Two-thirds (67%) think genomics will soon impact their practice, with a significant preference for models that involved genetics services (p<0.0001). Currently, respondents mainly perform tasks associated with pretest family history taking and counselling, but more respondents expect to perform tasks at all stages of testing in the future, including tasks related to the test itself, and reporting results. While one-third (34%) recently completed education in genomics, only a quarter (25%) felt prepared to practise. Specialists would like (more) education, particularly on genomic technologies and clinical utility, and prefer this to be through varied educational strategies. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides data from a breadth of physician specialties that can inform models of genetic service delivery and genomics education. The findings support education providers designing and delivering education that best meet learner needs to build a competent, genomic-literate workforce. Further analyses are underway to characterise early adopters of genomic medicine to inform strategies to increase engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82734632021-07-23 Measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey Nisselle, Amy King, Emily A McClaren, Belinda Janinski, Monika Metcalfe, Sylvia Gaff, Clara BMJ Open Genetics and Genomics OBJECTIVE: Even as genomic medicine is implemented globally, there remains a lack of rigorous, national assessments of physicians’ current genomic practice and continuing genomics education needs. The aim of this study was to address this gap. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey, informed by qualitative data and behaviour change theory, to assess the current landscape of Australian physicians’ genomic medicine practice, perceptions of proximity and individual preparedness, and preferred models of practice and continuing education. The survey was advertised nationally through 10 medical colleges, 24 societies, 62 hospitals, social media, professional networks and snowballing. RESULTS: 409 medical specialists across Australia responded, representing 30 specialties (majority paediatricians, 20%), from mainly public hospitals (70%) in metropolitan areas (75%). Half (53%) had contacted their local genetics services and half (54%) had ordered or referred for a gene panel or exome/genome sequencing test in the last year. Two-thirds (67%) think genomics will soon impact their practice, with a significant preference for models that involved genetics services (p<0.0001). Currently, respondents mainly perform tasks associated with pretest family history taking and counselling, but more respondents expect to perform tasks at all stages of testing in the future, including tasks related to the test itself, and reporting results. While one-third (34%) recently completed education in genomics, only a quarter (25%) felt prepared to practise. Specialists would like (more) education, particularly on genomic technologies and clinical utility, and prefer this to be through varied educational strategies. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides data from a breadth of physician specialties that can inform models of genetic service delivery and genomics education. The findings support education providers designing and delivering education that best meet learner needs to build a competent, genomic-literate workforce. Further analyses are underway to characterise early adopters of genomic medicine to inform strategies to increase engagement. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8273463/ /pubmed/34244249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044408 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Genetics and Genomics
Nisselle, Amy
King, Emily A
McClaren, Belinda
Janinski, Monika
Metcalfe, Sylvia
Gaff, Clara
Measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey
title Measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey
title_full Measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey
title_fullStr Measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey
title_short Measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey
title_sort measuring physician practice, preparedness and preferences for genomic medicine: a national survey
topic Genetics and Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044408
work_keys_str_mv AT nisselleamy measuringphysicianpracticepreparednessandpreferencesforgenomicmedicineanationalsurvey
AT kingemilya measuringphysicianpracticepreparednessandpreferencesforgenomicmedicineanationalsurvey
AT mcclarenbelinda measuringphysicianpracticepreparednessandpreferencesforgenomicmedicineanationalsurvey
AT janinskimonika measuringphysicianpracticepreparednessandpreferencesforgenomicmedicineanationalsurvey
AT metcalfesylvia measuringphysicianpracticepreparednessandpreferencesforgenomicmedicineanationalsurvey
AT gaffclara measuringphysicianpracticepreparednessandpreferencesforgenomicmedicineanationalsurvey
AT measuringphysicianpracticepreparednessandpreferencesforgenomicmedicineanationalsurvey