Cargando…
Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’
INTRODUCTION: With respect to patient-centred care and shared decision-making, measuring care effects based on outcomes relevant to patients is becoming increasingly important. Recently, a scoping review of the international literature revealed a wide range of supposedly patient-relevant outcomes an...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047679 |
_version_ | 1783721377406124032 |
---|---|
author | Kersting, Christine Barzel, Anne Mortsiefer, Achim |
author_facet | Kersting, Christine Barzel, Anne Mortsiefer, Achim |
author_sort | Kersting, Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: With respect to patient-centred care and shared decision-making, measuring care effects based on outcomes relevant to patients is becoming increasingly important. Recently, a scoping review of the international literature revealed a wide range of supposedly patient-relevant outcomes and found that there is neither a sound definition of patient relevance nor a consistent set of outcomes relevant to patients. To close this gap, this study aims to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance including a set of outcomes relevant to patients irrespective of diseases, which grades outcomes according to their importance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective mixed-methods study will integrate the perspectives of patients across diseases, healthcare professionals and researchers. The consensus process will consist of four phases. Based on the results of the recent scoping review, a patient survey will be conducted first, followed by a multiprofessional group discussion. Finally, a two-round online Delphi approach based on data from the previous phases will be applied to agree on a concept. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the study was granted on 26 August 2020 by the Ethics Commission of Witten/Herdecke University (reference number: 156/2020). In the long run, the implementation of an agreed concept on patient relevance will help improve the comparability of study results regarding the patient benefit and thereby strengthen the role of patients in the decision-making process. Also, the experiences regarding grading outcomes according to importance will help to develop a method on how to individualise clinical trial outcomes according to each patient’s individual specifics and priorities in order to more adequately represent the patient perspective in clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (registration number: 1685). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8273474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82734742021-07-23 Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’ Kersting, Christine Barzel, Anne Mortsiefer, Achim BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: With respect to patient-centred care and shared decision-making, measuring care effects based on outcomes relevant to patients is becoming increasingly important. Recently, a scoping review of the international literature revealed a wide range of supposedly patient-relevant outcomes and found that there is neither a sound definition of patient relevance nor a consistent set of outcomes relevant to patients. To close this gap, this study aims to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance including a set of outcomes relevant to patients irrespective of diseases, which grades outcomes according to their importance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective mixed-methods study will integrate the perspectives of patients across diseases, healthcare professionals and researchers. The consensus process will consist of four phases. Based on the results of the recent scoping review, a patient survey will be conducted first, followed by a multiprofessional group discussion. Finally, a two-round online Delphi approach based on data from the previous phases will be applied to agree on a concept. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the study was granted on 26 August 2020 by the Ethics Commission of Witten/Herdecke University (reference number: 156/2020). In the long run, the implementation of an agreed concept on patient relevance will help improve the comparability of study results regarding the patient benefit and thereby strengthen the role of patients in the decision-making process. Also, the experiences regarding grading outcomes according to importance will help to develop a method on how to individualise clinical trial outcomes according to each patient’s individual specifics and priorities in order to more adequately represent the patient perspective in clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (registration number: 1685). BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8273474/ /pubmed/34244269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047679 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Kersting, Christine Barzel, Anne Mortsiefer, Achim Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’ |
title | Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’ |
title_full | Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’ |
title_fullStr | Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’ |
title_full_unstemmed | Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’ |
title_short | Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’ |
title_sort | mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘pro patients study’ |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047679 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kerstingchristine mixedmethodsapproachtodevelopanagreedconceptonpatientrelevancestudyprotocolforthepropatientsstudy AT barzelanne mixedmethodsapproachtodevelopanagreedconceptonpatientrelevancestudyprotocolforthepropatientsstudy AT mortsieferachim mixedmethodsapproachtodevelopanagreedconceptonpatientrelevancestudyprotocolforthepropatientsstudy |