Cargando…

Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’

INTRODUCTION: With respect to patient-centred care and shared decision-making, measuring care effects based on outcomes relevant to patients is becoming increasingly important. Recently, a scoping review of the international literature revealed a wide range of supposedly patient-relevant outcomes an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kersting, Christine, Barzel, Anne, Mortsiefer, Achim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047679
_version_ 1783721377406124032
author Kersting, Christine
Barzel, Anne
Mortsiefer, Achim
author_facet Kersting, Christine
Barzel, Anne
Mortsiefer, Achim
author_sort Kersting, Christine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: With respect to patient-centred care and shared decision-making, measuring care effects based on outcomes relevant to patients is becoming increasingly important. Recently, a scoping review of the international literature revealed a wide range of supposedly patient-relevant outcomes and found that there is neither a sound definition of patient relevance nor a consistent set of outcomes relevant to patients. To close this gap, this study aims to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance including a set of outcomes relevant to patients irrespective of diseases, which grades outcomes according to their importance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective mixed-methods study will integrate the perspectives of patients across diseases, healthcare professionals and researchers. The consensus process will consist of four phases. Based on the results of the recent scoping review, a patient survey will be conducted first, followed by a multiprofessional group discussion. Finally, a two-round online Delphi approach based on data from the previous phases will be applied to agree on a concept. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the study was granted on 26 August 2020 by the Ethics Commission of Witten/Herdecke University (reference number: 156/2020). In the long run, the implementation of an agreed concept on patient relevance will help improve the comparability of study results regarding the patient benefit and thereby strengthen the role of patients in the decision-making process. Also, the experiences regarding grading outcomes according to importance will help to develop a method on how to individualise clinical trial outcomes according to each patient’s individual specifics and priorities in order to more adequately represent the patient perspective in clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (registration number: 1685).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82734742021-07-23 Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’ Kersting, Christine Barzel, Anne Mortsiefer, Achim BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: With respect to patient-centred care and shared decision-making, measuring care effects based on outcomes relevant to patients is becoming increasingly important. Recently, a scoping review of the international literature revealed a wide range of supposedly patient-relevant outcomes and found that there is neither a sound definition of patient relevance nor a consistent set of outcomes relevant to patients. To close this gap, this study aims to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance including a set of outcomes relevant to patients irrespective of diseases, which grades outcomes according to their importance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective mixed-methods study will integrate the perspectives of patients across diseases, healthcare professionals and researchers. The consensus process will consist of four phases. Based on the results of the recent scoping review, a patient survey will be conducted first, followed by a multiprofessional group discussion. Finally, a two-round online Delphi approach based on data from the previous phases will be applied to agree on a concept. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the study was granted on 26 August 2020 by the Ethics Commission of Witten/Herdecke University (reference number: 156/2020). In the long run, the implementation of an agreed concept on patient relevance will help improve the comparability of study results regarding the patient benefit and thereby strengthen the role of patients in the decision-making process. Also, the experiences regarding grading outcomes according to importance will help to develop a method on how to individualise clinical trial outcomes according to each patient’s individual specifics and priorities in order to more adequately represent the patient perspective in clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (registration number: 1685). BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8273474/ /pubmed/34244269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047679 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Kersting, Christine
Barzel, Anne
Mortsiefer, Achim
Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’
title Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’
title_full Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’
title_fullStr Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’
title_full_unstemmed Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’
title_short Mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘PRO patients study’
title_sort mixed-methods approach to develop an agreed concept on patient relevance: study protocol for the ‘pro patients study’
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047679
work_keys_str_mv AT kerstingchristine mixedmethodsapproachtodevelopanagreedconceptonpatientrelevancestudyprotocolforthepropatientsstudy
AT barzelanne mixedmethodsapproachtodevelopanagreedconceptonpatientrelevancestudyprotocolforthepropatientsstudy
AT mortsieferachim mixedmethodsapproachtodevelopanagreedconceptonpatientrelevancestudyprotocolforthepropatientsstudy