Cargando…

Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation

OBJECTIVE: Balanced scorecards (BSCs) were developed in the early 1990s in corporate settings as a strategic performance management tool that emphasised measurement from multiple perspectives. Since their introduction, BSCs have been adapted for a variety of industries, including to healthcare setti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bohm, Victoria, Lacaille, Diane, Spencer, Nicole, Barber, Claire EH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001293
_version_ 1783721378821701632
author Bohm, Victoria
Lacaille, Diane
Spencer, Nicole
Barber, Claire EH
author_facet Bohm, Victoria
Lacaille, Diane
Spencer, Nicole
Barber, Claire EH
author_sort Bohm, Victoria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Balanced scorecards (BSCs) were developed in the early 1990s in corporate settings as a strategic performance management tool that emphasised measurement from multiple perspectives. Since their introduction, BSCs have been adapted for a variety of industries, including to healthcare settings. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the application of BSCs in healthcare. METHODS: Medline, Embase and CINHAL databases were searched using keywords and medical subject headings for ‘balanced scorecard’ and related terms from 1992 to 17/04/2020. Title and abstract screening and full text review were conducted in duplicate by two reviewers. Studies describing the development and/or implementation of a BSC in a healthcare setting were included. Data were abstracted using pilot-tested forms and reviewed for key themes and findings. RESULTS: 8129 records were identified and 841 underwent a full text review. 87 articles were included. Over 26 countries were represented and the majority of BSCs were applied at a local level (54%) in hospital settings (41%). While almost all discussed Kaplan and Norton’s original BSC (97%), only 69% described alignment with a strategic plan. Patients/family members were rarely involved in development teams (3%) which typically were comprised of senior healthcare leaders/administrators. Only 21% of BSCs included perspectives using identical formatting to the original BSC description. Lessons learnt during development addressed three main themes: scorecard design, stakeholder engagement and feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: BSC frameworks have been used in various healthcare settings but frequently undergo adaptation from the original description in order to suit a specific healthcare context. Future BSCs should aim to include patients/families to promote patient-centred healthcare systems. Considering the heterogeneity evident in development approaches, methodological guidance in this area is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82734812021-07-23 Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation Bohm, Victoria Lacaille, Diane Spencer, Nicole Barber, Claire EH BMJ Open Qual Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Balanced scorecards (BSCs) were developed in the early 1990s in corporate settings as a strategic performance management tool that emphasised measurement from multiple perspectives. Since their introduction, BSCs have been adapted for a variety of industries, including to healthcare settings. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the application of BSCs in healthcare. METHODS: Medline, Embase and CINHAL databases were searched using keywords and medical subject headings for ‘balanced scorecard’ and related terms from 1992 to 17/04/2020. Title and abstract screening and full text review were conducted in duplicate by two reviewers. Studies describing the development and/or implementation of a BSC in a healthcare setting were included. Data were abstracted using pilot-tested forms and reviewed for key themes and findings. RESULTS: 8129 records were identified and 841 underwent a full text review. 87 articles were included. Over 26 countries were represented and the majority of BSCs were applied at a local level (54%) in hospital settings (41%). While almost all discussed Kaplan and Norton’s original BSC (97%), only 69% described alignment with a strategic plan. Patients/family members were rarely involved in development teams (3%) which typically were comprised of senior healthcare leaders/administrators. Only 21% of BSCs included perspectives using identical formatting to the original BSC description. Lessons learnt during development addressed three main themes: scorecard design, stakeholder engagement and feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: BSC frameworks have been used in various healthcare settings but frequently undergo adaptation from the original description in order to suit a specific healthcare context. Future BSCs should aim to include patients/families to promote patient-centred healthcare systems. Considering the heterogeneity evident in development approaches, methodological guidance in this area is warranted. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8273481/ /pubmed/34244173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001293 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Bohm, Victoria
Lacaille, Diane
Spencer, Nicole
Barber, Claire EH
Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation
title Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation
title_full Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation
title_fullStr Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation
title_short Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation
title_sort scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001293
work_keys_str_mv AT bohmvictoria scopingreviewofbalancedscorecardsforuseinhealthcaresettingsdevelopmentandimplementation
AT lacaillediane scopingreviewofbalancedscorecardsforuseinhealthcaresettingsdevelopmentandimplementation
AT spencernicole scopingreviewofbalancedscorecardsforuseinhealthcaresettingsdevelopmentandimplementation
AT barberclaireeh scopingreviewofbalancedscorecardsforuseinhealthcaresettingsdevelopmentandimplementation