Cargando…
Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation
OBJECTIVE: Balanced scorecards (BSCs) were developed in the early 1990s in corporate settings as a strategic performance management tool that emphasised measurement from multiple perspectives. Since their introduction, BSCs have been adapted for a variety of industries, including to healthcare setti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001293 |
_version_ | 1783721378821701632 |
---|---|
author | Bohm, Victoria Lacaille, Diane Spencer, Nicole Barber, Claire EH |
author_facet | Bohm, Victoria Lacaille, Diane Spencer, Nicole Barber, Claire EH |
author_sort | Bohm, Victoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Balanced scorecards (BSCs) were developed in the early 1990s in corporate settings as a strategic performance management tool that emphasised measurement from multiple perspectives. Since their introduction, BSCs have been adapted for a variety of industries, including to healthcare settings. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the application of BSCs in healthcare. METHODS: Medline, Embase and CINHAL databases were searched using keywords and medical subject headings for ‘balanced scorecard’ and related terms from 1992 to 17/04/2020. Title and abstract screening and full text review were conducted in duplicate by two reviewers. Studies describing the development and/or implementation of a BSC in a healthcare setting were included. Data were abstracted using pilot-tested forms and reviewed for key themes and findings. RESULTS: 8129 records were identified and 841 underwent a full text review. 87 articles were included. Over 26 countries were represented and the majority of BSCs were applied at a local level (54%) in hospital settings (41%). While almost all discussed Kaplan and Norton’s original BSC (97%), only 69% described alignment with a strategic plan. Patients/family members were rarely involved in development teams (3%) which typically were comprised of senior healthcare leaders/administrators. Only 21% of BSCs included perspectives using identical formatting to the original BSC description. Lessons learnt during development addressed three main themes: scorecard design, stakeholder engagement and feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: BSC frameworks have been used in various healthcare settings but frequently undergo adaptation from the original description in order to suit a specific healthcare context. Future BSCs should aim to include patients/families to promote patient-centred healthcare systems. Considering the heterogeneity evident in development approaches, methodological guidance in this area is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8273481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82734812021-07-23 Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation Bohm, Victoria Lacaille, Diane Spencer, Nicole Barber, Claire EH BMJ Open Qual Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Balanced scorecards (BSCs) were developed in the early 1990s in corporate settings as a strategic performance management tool that emphasised measurement from multiple perspectives. Since their introduction, BSCs have been adapted for a variety of industries, including to healthcare settings. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the application of BSCs in healthcare. METHODS: Medline, Embase and CINHAL databases were searched using keywords and medical subject headings for ‘balanced scorecard’ and related terms from 1992 to 17/04/2020. Title and abstract screening and full text review were conducted in duplicate by two reviewers. Studies describing the development and/or implementation of a BSC in a healthcare setting were included. Data were abstracted using pilot-tested forms and reviewed for key themes and findings. RESULTS: 8129 records were identified and 841 underwent a full text review. 87 articles were included. Over 26 countries were represented and the majority of BSCs were applied at a local level (54%) in hospital settings (41%). While almost all discussed Kaplan and Norton’s original BSC (97%), only 69% described alignment with a strategic plan. Patients/family members were rarely involved in development teams (3%) which typically were comprised of senior healthcare leaders/administrators. Only 21% of BSCs included perspectives using identical formatting to the original BSC description. Lessons learnt during development addressed three main themes: scorecard design, stakeholder engagement and feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: BSC frameworks have been used in various healthcare settings but frequently undergo adaptation from the original description in order to suit a specific healthcare context. Future BSCs should aim to include patients/families to promote patient-centred healthcare systems. Considering the heterogeneity evident in development approaches, methodological guidance in this area is warranted. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8273481/ /pubmed/34244173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001293 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Bohm, Victoria Lacaille, Diane Spencer, Nicole Barber, Claire EH Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation |
title | Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation |
title_full | Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation |
title_fullStr | Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation |
title_short | Scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation |
title_sort | scoping review of balanced scorecards for use in healthcare settings: development and implementation |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bohmvictoria scopingreviewofbalancedscorecardsforuseinhealthcaresettingsdevelopmentandimplementation AT lacaillediane scopingreviewofbalancedscorecardsforuseinhealthcaresettingsdevelopmentandimplementation AT spencernicole scopingreviewofbalancedscorecardsforuseinhealthcaresettingsdevelopmentandimplementation AT barberclaireeh scopingreviewofbalancedscorecardsforuseinhealthcaresettingsdevelopmentandimplementation |