Cargando…

Mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (MOBILE2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial—study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) prior to rectal surgery is widely used. Based on retrospective data many guidelines recommend mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation (MOABP) to reduce postoperative complications and specifically surgical site infections (SSIs). The primary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koskenvuo, Laura, Lunkka, Pipsa, Varpe, Pirita, Hyöty, Marja, Satokari, Reetta, Haapamäki, Carola, Lepistö, Anna, Sallinen, Ville
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051269
_version_ 1783721379536830464
author Koskenvuo, Laura
Lunkka, Pipsa
Varpe, Pirita
Hyöty, Marja
Satokari, Reetta
Haapamäki, Carola
Lepistö, Anna
Sallinen, Ville
author_facet Koskenvuo, Laura
Lunkka, Pipsa
Varpe, Pirita
Hyöty, Marja
Satokari, Reetta
Haapamäki, Carola
Lepistö, Anna
Sallinen, Ville
author_sort Koskenvuo, Laura
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) prior to rectal surgery is widely used. Based on retrospective data many guidelines recommend mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation (MOABP) to reduce postoperative complications and specifically surgical site infections (SSIs). The primary aim of this study is to examine whether MOABP reduces complications of rectal surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The MOBILE2 (Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics vs Mechanical Bowel Preparation Only Prior Rectal Surgery) trial is a multicentre, double-blinded, parallel group, superiority, randomised controlled trial comparing MOABP to MBP among patients scheduled for rectal surgery with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The patients randomised to the MOABP group receive 1 g neomycin and 1 g metronidazole two times on a day prior to surgery and patients randomised to the MBP group receive identical placebo. Based on power calculations, 604 patients will be enrolled in the study. The primary outcome is Comprehensive Complication Index within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes are SSIs within 30 days after surgery, the number and classification of anastomosis dehiscences, the length of hospital stay, mortality within 90 days after surgery and the number of patients who received adjuvant treatment if needed. Tertiary outcomes are overall survival, disease-specific survival, recurrence-free survival and difference in quality-of-life before and 1 year after surgery. In addition, the microbiota differences in colon mucosa are analysed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital approved the study. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04281667.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82734842021-07-23 Mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (MOBILE2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial—study protocol Koskenvuo, Laura Lunkka, Pipsa Varpe, Pirita Hyöty, Marja Satokari, Reetta Haapamäki, Carola Lepistö, Anna Sallinen, Ville BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology INTRODUCTION: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) prior to rectal surgery is widely used. Based on retrospective data many guidelines recommend mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation (MOABP) to reduce postoperative complications and specifically surgical site infections (SSIs). The primary aim of this study is to examine whether MOABP reduces complications of rectal surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The MOBILE2 (Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics vs Mechanical Bowel Preparation Only Prior Rectal Surgery) trial is a multicentre, double-blinded, parallel group, superiority, randomised controlled trial comparing MOABP to MBP among patients scheduled for rectal surgery with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The patients randomised to the MOABP group receive 1 g neomycin and 1 g metronidazole two times on a day prior to surgery and patients randomised to the MBP group receive identical placebo. Based on power calculations, 604 patients will be enrolled in the study. The primary outcome is Comprehensive Complication Index within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes are SSIs within 30 days after surgery, the number and classification of anastomosis dehiscences, the length of hospital stay, mortality within 90 days after surgery and the number of patients who received adjuvant treatment if needed. Tertiary outcomes are overall survival, disease-specific survival, recurrence-free survival and difference in quality-of-life before and 1 year after surgery. In addition, the microbiota differences in colon mucosa are analysed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital approved the study. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04281667. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8273484/ /pubmed/34244284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051269 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Koskenvuo, Laura
Lunkka, Pipsa
Varpe, Pirita
Hyöty, Marja
Satokari, Reetta
Haapamäki, Carola
Lepistö, Anna
Sallinen, Ville
Mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (MOBILE2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial—study protocol
title Mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (MOBILE2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial—study protocol
title_full Mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (MOBILE2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial—study protocol
title_fullStr Mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (MOBILE2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial—study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (MOBILE2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial—study protocol
title_short Mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (MOBILE2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial—study protocol
title_sort mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation only prior rectal surgery (mobile2): a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial—study protocol
topic Gastroenterology and Hepatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051269
work_keys_str_mv AT koskenvuolaura mechanicalbowelpreparationandoralantibioticsversusmechanicalbowelpreparationonlypriorrectalsurgerymobile2amulticentredoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT lunkkapipsa mechanicalbowelpreparationandoralantibioticsversusmechanicalbowelpreparationonlypriorrectalsurgerymobile2amulticentredoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT varpepirita mechanicalbowelpreparationandoralantibioticsversusmechanicalbowelpreparationonlypriorrectalsurgerymobile2amulticentredoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT hyotymarja mechanicalbowelpreparationandoralantibioticsversusmechanicalbowelpreparationonlypriorrectalsurgerymobile2amulticentredoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT satokarireetta mechanicalbowelpreparationandoralantibioticsversusmechanicalbowelpreparationonlypriorrectalsurgerymobile2amulticentredoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT haapamakicarola mechanicalbowelpreparationandoralantibioticsversusmechanicalbowelpreparationonlypriorrectalsurgerymobile2amulticentredoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT lepistoanna mechanicalbowelpreparationandoralantibioticsversusmechanicalbowelpreparationonlypriorrectalsurgerymobile2amulticentredoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT sallinenville mechanicalbowelpreparationandoralantibioticsversusmechanicalbowelpreparationonlypriorrectalsurgerymobile2amulticentredoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol