Cargando…

Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of peer-befriending, for people with aphasia. DESIGN: Single-blind, parallel-group feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care + peer-befriending. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: People with aphasia post-stroke and lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilari, Katerina, Behn, Nicholas, James, Kirsty, Northcott, Sarah, Marshall, Jane, Thomas, Shirley, Simpson, Alan, Moss, Becky, Flood, Chris, McVicker, Sally, Goldsmith, Kimberley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215521995671
_version_ 1783721389934510080
author Hilari, Katerina
Behn, Nicholas
James, Kirsty
Northcott, Sarah
Marshall, Jane
Thomas, Shirley
Simpson, Alan
Moss, Becky
Flood, Chris
McVicker, Sally
Goldsmith, Kimberley
author_facet Hilari, Katerina
Behn, Nicholas
James, Kirsty
Northcott, Sarah
Marshall, Jane
Thomas, Shirley
Simpson, Alan
Moss, Becky
Flood, Chris
McVicker, Sally
Goldsmith, Kimberley
author_sort Hilari, Katerina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of peer-befriending, for people with aphasia. DESIGN: Single-blind, parallel-group feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care + peer-befriending. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: People with aphasia post-stroke and low levels of distress, recruited from 5 NHS Hospitals and linked community services; their significant others; and 10 befrienders recruited from community. INTERVENTION: Six 1-hour peer-befriending visits over three months. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility parameters included proportion eligible of those screened; proportion consented; missing data; consent and attrition rates. Acceptability was explored through qualitative interviews. Outcomes for participants and significant others were measured at baseline, 4- and 10-months; for peer-befrienders before training and after one/two cycles of befriending. RESULTS: Of 738 patients identified, 75 were eligible of 89 fully screened (84%), 62 consented (83% of eligible) and 56 randomised. Attrition was 16%. Adherence was high (93% attended ⩾2 sessions, 81% all six). The difference at 10 months on the GHQ-12 was 1.23 points on average lower/better in the intervention arm (95% CI 0.17, −2.63). There was an 88% decrease in the odds of GHQ-12 caseness (95% CI 0.01, 1.01). Fourty-eight significant others and 10 peer-befrienders took part. Procedures and outcome measures were acceptable. Serious adverse events were few (n = 10, none for significant others and peer-befrienders) and unrelated. CONCLUSIONS: SUPERB peer-befriending for people with aphasia post-stroke experiencing low levels of distress was feasible. There was preliminary evidence of benefit in terms of depression. Peer-befriending is a suitable intervention to explore further in a definitive trial. Clinical trial registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT02947776 Subject terms: Translational research, mental health, rehabilitation, quality and outcomes, stroke
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82735362021-07-20 Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial Hilari, Katerina Behn, Nicholas James, Kirsty Northcott, Sarah Marshall, Jane Thomas, Shirley Simpson, Alan Moss, Becky Flood, Chris McVicker, Sally Goldsmith, Kimberley Clin Rehabil Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of peer-befriending, for people with aphasia. DESIGN: Single-blind, parallel-group feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care + peer-befriending. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: People with aphasia post-stroke and low levels of distress, recruited from 5 NHS Hospitals and linked community services; their significant others; and 10 befrienders recruited from community. INTERVENTION: Six 1-hour peer-befriending visits over three months. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility parameters included proportion eligible of those screened; proportion consented; missing data; consent and attrition rates. Acceptability was explored through qualitative interviews. Outcomes for participants and significant others were measured at baseline, 4- and 10-months; for peer-befrienders before training and after one/two cycles of befriending. RESULTS: Of 738 patients identified, 75 were eligible of 89 fully screened (84%), 62 consented (83% of eligible) and 56 randomised. Attrition was 16%. Adherence was high (93% attended ⩾2 sessions, 81% all six). The difference at 10 months on the GHQ-12 was 1.23 points on average lower/better in the intervention arm (95% CI 0.17, −2.63). There was an 88% decrease in the odds of GHQ-12 caseness (95% CI 0.01, 1.01). Fourty-eight significant others and 10 peer-befrienders took part. Procedures and outcome measures were acceptable. Serious adverse events were few (n = 10, none for significant others and peer-befrienders) and unrelated. CONCLUSIONS: SUPERB peer-befriending for people with aphasia post-stroke experiencing low levels of distress was feasible. There was preliminary evidence of benefit in terms of depression. Peer-befriending is a suitable intervention to explore further in a definitive trial. Clinical trial registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT02947776 Subject terms: Translational research, mental health, rehabilitation, quality and outcomes, stroke SAGE Publications 2021-02-24 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8273536/ /pubmed/33624514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215521995671 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hilari, Katerina
Behn, Nicholas
James, Kirsty
Northcott, Sarah
Marshall, Jane
Thomas, Shirley
Simpson, Alan
Moss, Becky
Flood, Chris
McVicker, Sally
Goldsmith, Kimberley
Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial
title Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_short Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_sort supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (superb) for people with aphasia: a feasibility randomised controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215521995671
work_keys_str_mv AT hilarikaterina supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT behnnicholas supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jameskirsty supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT northcottsarah supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marshalljane supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thomasshirley supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT simpsonalan supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mossbecky supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT floodchris supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcvickersally supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT goldsmithkimberley supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial