Cargando…
Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of peer-befriending, for people with aphasia. DESIGN: Single-blind, parallel-group feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care + peer-befriending. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: People with aphasia post-stroke and lo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215521995671 |
_version_ | 1783721389934510080 |
---|---|
author | Hilari, Katerina Behn, Nicholas James, Kirsty Northcott, Sarah Marshall, Jane Thomas, Shirley Simpson, Alan Moss, Becky Flood, Chris McVicker, Sally Goldsmith, Kimberley |
author_facet | Hilari, Katerina Behn, Nicholas James, Kirsty Northcott, Sarah Marshall, Jane Thomas, Shirley Simpson, Alan Moss, Becky Flood, Chris McVicker, Sally Goldsmith, Kimberley |
author_sort | Hilari, Katerina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of peer-befriending, for people with aphasia. DESIGN: Single-blind, parallel-group feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care + peer-befriending. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: People with aphasia post-stroke and low levels of distress, recruited from 5 NHS Hospitals and linked community services; their significant others; and 10 befrienders recruited from community. INTERVENTION: Six 1-hour peer-befriending visits over three months. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility parameters included proportion eligible of those screened; proportion consented; missing data; consent and attrition rates. Acceptability was explored through qualitative interviews. Outcomes for participants and significant others were measured at baseline, 4- and 10-months; for peer-befrienders before training and after one/two cycles of befriending. RESULTS: Of 738 patients identified, 75 were eligible of 89 fully screened (84%), 62 consented (83% of eligible) and 56 randomised. Attrition was 16%. Adherence was high (93% attended ⩾2 sessions, 81% all six). The difference at 10 months on the GHQ-12 was 1.23 points on average lower/better in the intervention arm (95% CI 0.17, −2.63). There was an 88% decrease in the odds of GHQ-12 caseness (95% CI 0.01, 1.01). Fourty-eight significant others and 10 peer-befrienders took part. Procedures and outcome measures were acceptable. Serious adverse events were few (n = 10, none for significant others and peer-befrienders) and unrelated. CONCLUSIONS: SUPERB peer-befriending for people with aphasia post-stroke experiencing low levels of distress was feasible. There was preliminary evidence of benefit in terms of depression. Peer-befriending is a suitable intervention to explore further in a definitive trial. Clinical trial registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT02947776 Subject terms: Translational research, mental health, rehabilitation, quality and outcomes, stroke |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8273536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82735362021-07-20 Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial Hilari, Katerina Behn, Nicholas James, Kirsty Northcott, Sarah Marshall, Jane Thomas, Shirley Simpson, Alan Moss, Becky Flood, Chris McVicker, Sally Goldsmith, Kimberley Clin Rehabil Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of peer-befriending, for people with aphasia. DESIGN: Single-blind, parallel-group feasibility randomised controlled trial comparing usual care to usual care + peer-befriending. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: People with aphasia post-stroke and low levels of distress, recruited from 5 NHS Hospitals and linked community services; their significant others; and 10 befrienders recruited from community. INTERVENTION: Six 1-hour peer-befriending visits over three months. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility parameters included proportion eligible of those screened; proportion consented; missing data; consent and attrition rates. Acceptability was explored through qualitative interviews. Outcomes for participants and significant others were measured at baseline, 4- and 10-months; for peer-befrienders before training and after one/two cycles of befriending. RESULTS: Of 738 patients identified, 75 were eligible of 89 fully screened (84%), 62 consented (83% of eligible) and 56 randomised. Attrition was 16%. Adherence was high (93% attended ⩾2 sessions, 81% all six). The difference at 10 months on the GHQ-12 was 1.23 points on average lower/better in the intervention arm (95% CI 0.17, −2.63). There was an 88% decrease in the odds of GHQ-12 caseness (95% CI 0.01, 1.01). Fourty-eight significant others and 10 peer-befrienders took part. Procedures and outcome measures were acceptable. Serious adverse events were few (n = 10, none for significant others and peer-befrienders) and unrelated. CONCLUSIONS: SUPERB peer-befriending for people with aphasia post-stroke experiencing low levels of distress was feasible. There was preliminary evidence of benefit in terms of depression. Peer-befriending is a suitable intervention to explore further in a definitive trial. Clinical trial registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT02947776 Subject terms: Translational research, mental health, rehabilitation, quality and outcomes, stroke SAGE Publications 2021-02-24 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8273536/ /pubmed/33624514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215521995671 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hilari, Katerina Behn, Nicholas James, Kirsty Northcott, Sarah Marshall, Jane Thomas, Shirley Simpson, Alan Moss, Becky Flood, Chris McVicker, Sally Goldsmith, Kimberley Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title | Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (superb) for people with aphasia: a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215521995671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilarikaterina supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT behnnicholas supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jameskirsty supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT northcottsarah supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marshalljane supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thomasshirley supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT simpsonalan supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mossbecky supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT floodchris supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcvickersally supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT goldsmithkimberley supportingwellbeingthroughpeerbefriendingsuperbforpeoplewithaphasiaafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial |