Cargando…

A systematic review and meta‐analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for complications of perforator flaps in plantar reconstruction. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to October 2020. Only studies on reconst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wei, Li, Xinyi, Li, Xiaojing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33675188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13552
_version_ 1783721404014788608
author Zhang, Wei
Li, Xinyi
Li, Xiaojing
author_facet Zhang, Wei
Li, Xinyi
Li, Xiaojing
author_sort Zhang, Wei
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for complications of perforator flaps in plantar reconstruction. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to October 2020. Only studies on reconstructing plantar defects with perforator flaps were included, and specific data were required for each patient in the included studies. A total of 14 studies involving 111 flaps were identified and included in the meta‐analysis. Our meta‐analysis identified two risk factors for postoperative complications: flap size over 50 cm(2) (risk ratio [RR] = 3.12; P = .02), diabetes mellitus foot (RR = 3.26; P = .03). No significant differences were found regarding heel defects (P = .34), single perforator (P = .57), age older than 60 years (P = .19), chronic aetiology (P = .13), trauma (P = .33), tumour resection (P = .60), ulcer (P = .84), and burn (P = .76). Although more high‐quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed, this meta‐analysis indicated that flap size over 50 cm(2) and diabetes mellitus foot were significant risk factors for postoperative complications of perforator flaps in plantar reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82736102021-07-14 A systematic review and meta‐analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications Zhang, Wei Li, Xinyi Li, Xiaojing Int Wound J Original Articles The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for complications of perforator flaps in plantar reconstruction. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to October 2020. Only studies on reconstructing plantar defects with perforator flaps were included, and specific data were required for each patient in the included studies. A total of 14 studies involving 111 flaps were identified and included in the meta‐analysis. Our meta‐analysis identified two risk factors for postoperative complications: flap size over 50 cm(2) (risk ratio [RR] = 3.12; P = .02), diabetes mellitus foot (RR = 3.26; P = .03). No significant differences were found regarding heel defects (P = .34), single perforator (P = .57), age older than 60 years (P = .19), chronic aetiology (P = .13), trauma (P = .33), tumour resection (P = .60), ulcer (P = .84), and burn (P = .76). Although more high‐quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed, this meta‐analysis indicated that flap size over 50 cm(2) and diabetes mellitus foot were significant risk factors for postoperative complications of perforator flaps in plantar reconstruction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8273610/ /pubmed/33675188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13552 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhang, Wei
Li, Xinyi
Li, Xiaojing
A systematic review and meta‐analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications
title A systematic review and meta‐analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications
title_full A systematic review and meta‐analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta‐analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta‐analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications
title_short A systematic review and meta‐analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: Risk analysis of complications
title_sort systematic review and meta‐analysis of perforator flaps in plantar defects: risk analysis of complications
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33675188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13552
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofperforatorflapsinplantardefectsriskanalysisofcomplications
AT lixinyi asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofperforatorflapsinplantardefectsriskanalysisofcomplications
AT lixiaojing asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofperforatorflapsinplantardefectsriskanalysisofcomplications
AT zhangwei systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofperforatorflapsinplantardefectsriskanalysisofcomplications
AT lixinyi systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofperforatorflapsinplantardefectsriskanalysisofcomplications
AT lixiaojing systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofperforatorflapsinplantardefectsriskanalysisofcomplications