Cargando…

β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: More friend than enemy

Nonselective beta-adrenergic blocker (NSBB) therapy for the prevention of initial and recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices has been used for the past four decades. NSBB therapy is considered the cornerstone of treatment for varices, and has become t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Ki Tae, Liu, Hongqun, Lee, Samuel S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0234
_version_ 1783721409736867840
author Yoon, Ki Tae
Liu, Hongqun
Lee, Samuel S.
author_facet Yoon, Ki Tae
Liu, Hongqun
Lee, Samuel S.
author_sort Yoon, Ki Tae
collection PubMed
description Nonselective beta-adrenergic blocker (NSBB) therapy for the prevention of initial and recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices has been used for the past four decades. NSBB therapy is considered the cornerstone of treatment for varices, and has become the standard of care. However, a 2010 study from the group that pioneered β-blocker therapy suggested a detrimental effect of NSBBs in decompensated cirrhosis, especially in patients with refractory ascites. Since then, numerous additional studies have incompletely resolved whether NSBBs are deleterious, although more recent evidence weighs against a harmful effect. The possibility of a “therapeutic window” has also been raised. We aimed to review the literature to analyze the pros and cons of using NSBBs in patients with cirrhosis, not only with respect to bleeding or mortality but also to other potential benefits and risks. β-blockers are highly effective in preventing first bleeding and recurrent bleeding. Furthermore, NSBBs improve congestion/ischemia of the gut mucosa, decrease intestinal permeability, and therefore indirectly alleviate systemic inflammation. β-blockers shorten the electrocardiographic prolonged QTc interval and may also decrease the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. On the other hand, the possibility of deleterious effects in cirrhosis has not been completely eliminated. NSBBs may be associated with an increased risk of portal vein thrombosis, although this could be correlational artifact. Overall, we conclude that β-blockers in cirrhosis are much more of a friend than enemy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82736372021-07-22 β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: More friend than enemy Yoon, Ki Tae Liu, Hongqun Lee, Samuel S. Clin Mol Hepatol Review Nonselective beta-adrenergic blocker (NSBB) therapy for the prevention of initial and recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices has been used for the past four decades. NSBB therapy is considered the cornerstone of treatment for varices, and has become the standard of care. However, a 2010 study from the group that pioneered β-blocker therapy suggested a detrimental effect of NSBBs in decompensated cirrhosis, especially in patients with refractory ascites. Since then, numerous additional studies have incompletely resolved whether NSBBs are deleterious, although more recent evidence weighs against a harmful effect. The possibility of a “therapeutic window” has also been raised. We aimed to review the literature to analyze the pros and cons of using NSBBs in patients with cirrhosis, not only with respect to bleeding or mortality but also to other potential benefits and risks. β-blockers are highly effective in preventing first bleeding and recurrent bleeding. Furthermore, NSBBs improve congestion/ischemia of the gut mucosa, decrease intestinal permeability, and therefore indirectly alleviate systemic inflammation. β-blockers shorten the electrocardiographic prolonged QTc interval and may also decrease the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. On the other hand, the possibility of deleterious effects in cirrhosis has not been completely eliminated. NSBBs may be associated with an increased risk of portal vein thrombosis, although this could be correlational artifact. Overall, we conclude that β-blockers in cirrhosis are much more of a friend than enemy. The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver 2021-07 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8273637/ /pubmed/33317244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0234 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Yoon, Ki Tae
Liu, Hongqun
Lee, Samuel S.
β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: More friend than enemy
title β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: More friend than enemy
title_full β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: More friend than enemy
title_fullStr β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: More friend than enemy
title_full_unstemmed β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: More friend than enemy
title_short β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: More friend than enemy
title_sort β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: more friend than enemy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33317244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0234
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonkitae bblockersinadvancedcirrhosismorefriendthanenemy
AT liuhongqun bblockersinadvancedcirrhosismorefriendthanenemy
AT leesamuels bblockersinadvancedcirrhosismorefriendthanenemy