Cargando…

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulators Efficacy for Noninvasive Bone Growth in Spine Surgery

The growth of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy and its progress over the years for use in post-operative bone growth has been revolutionary in its effect on bone tissue proliferation and vascular flow. However, further progress in PEMF therapy has been difficult due to lack of more eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiani, Brian, Kondilis, Athanasios, Runnels, Juliana, Rippe, Preston, Davati, Cyrus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurosurgical Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34107606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0269
_version_ 1783721438528667648
author Fiani, Brian
Kondilis, Athanasios
Runnels, Juliana
Rippe, Preston
Davati, Cyrus
author_facet Fiani, Brian
Kondilis, Athanasios
Runnels, Juliana
Rippe, Preston
Davati, Cyrus
author_sort Fiani, Brian
collection PubMed
description The growth of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy and its progress over the years for use in post-operative bone growth has been revolutionary in its effect on bone tissue proliferation and vascular flow. However, further progress in PEMF therapy has been difficult due to lack of more evidence-based understanding of its mechanism of action. Our objective was to review the current understanding of bone growth physiology, the mechanism of PEMF therapy action along with its application in spinal surgery and associated outcomes. The authors of this review examined multiple controlled, comparative, and cohort studies to compare fusion rates of patients undergoing PEMF stimulation. Examining spinal fusion rates, a rounded comparison of post-fusion outcomes with and without bone stimulator was performed. Results showed that postoperative spinal surgery PEMF stimulation had higher rates of fusion than control groups. Though PEMF therapy was proven more effective, multiple factors contributed to difficulty in patient compliance for use. Extended timeframe of treatment and cost of treatment were the main obstacles to full compliance. This review showed that PEMF therapy presented an increased rate of recovery in patients, supporting the use of these devices as an effective post-surgical aid. Given the recent advances in the development of PEMF devices, affordability and access will be much easier suited to the patient population, allowing for more readily available treatment options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82737862021-07-20 Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulators Efficacy for Noninvasive Bone Growth in Spine Surgery Fiani, Brian Kondilis, Athanasios Runnels, Juliana Rippe, Preston Davati, Cyrus J Korean Neurosurg Soc Review Article The growth of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy and its progress over the years for use in post-operative bone growth has been revolutionary in its effect on bone tissue proliferation and vascular flow. However, further progress in PEMF therapy has been difficult due to lack of more evidence-based understanding of its mechanism of action. Our objective was to review the current understanding of bone growth physiology, the mechanism of PEMF therapy action along with its application in spinal surgery and associated outcomes. The authors of this review examined multiple controlled, comparative, and cohort studies to compare fusion rates of patients undergoing PEMF stimulation. Examining spinal fusion rates, a rounded comparison of post-fusion outcomes with and without bone stimulator was performed. Results showed that postoperative spinal surgery PEMF stimulation had higher rates of fusion than control groups. Though PEMF therapy was proven more effective, multiple factors contributed to difficulty in patient compliance for use. Extended timeframe of treatment and cost of treatment were the main obstacles to full compliance. This review showed that PEMF therapy presented an increased rate of recovery in patients, supporting the use of these devices as an effective post-surgical aid. Given the recent advances in the development of PEMF devices, affordability and access will be much easier suited to the patient population, allowing for more readily available treatment options. Korean Neurosurgical Society 2021-07 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8273786/ /pubmed/34107606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0269 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Neurosurgical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Fiani, Brian
Kondilis, Athanasios
Runnels, Juliana
Rippe, Preston
Davati, Cyrus
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulators Efficacy for Noninvasive Bone Growth in Spine Surgery
title Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulators Efficacy for Noninvasive Bone Growth in Spine Surgery
title_full Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulators Efficacy for Noninvasive Bone Growth in Spine Surgery
title_fullStr Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulators Efficacy for Noninvasive Bone Growth in Spine Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulators Efficacy for Noninvasive Bone Growth in Spine Surgery
title_short Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulators Efficacy for Noninvasive Bone Growth in Spine Surgery
title_sort pulsed electromagnetic field stimulators efficacy for noninvasive bone growth in spine surgery
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34107606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0269
work_keys_str_mv AT fianibrian pulsedelectromagneticfieldstimulatorsefficacyfornoninvasivebonegrowthinspinesurgery
AT kondilisathanasios pulsedelectromagneticfieldstimulatorsefficacyfornoninvasivebonegrowthinspinesurgery
AT runnelsjuliana pulsedelectromagneticfieldstimulatorsefficacyfornoninvasivebonegrowthinspinesurgery
AT rippepreston pulsedelectromagneticfieldstimulatorsefficacyfornoninvasivebonegrowthinspinesurgery
AT davaticyrus pulsedelectromagneticfieldstimulatorsefficacyfornoninvasivebonegrowthinspinesurgery