Cargando…
Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units
INTRODUCTION: Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use. METHODS: In this two-part study, we first characterized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019694 |
_version_ | 1783721458479923200 |
---|---|
author | David, Ann ReethaJanetSureka, StephenSukumaran Gayathri, Sankaralingam Annamalai, Salai Jeyseelan Samuelkamleshkumar, Selvaraj Kuruvilla, Anju Magimairaj, Henry Prakash Varadhan, SKM Balasubramanian, Sivakumar |
author_facet | David, Ann ReethaJanetSureka, StephenSukumaran Gayathri, Sankaralingam Annamalai, Salai Jeyseelan Samuelkamleshkumar, Selvaraj Kuruvilla, Anju Magimairaj, Henry Prakash Varadhan, SKM Balasubramanian, Sivakumar |
author_sort | David, Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use. METHODS: In this two-part study, we first characterized the GM by comparing it to annotated video recordings of 5 hemiparetic patients and 10 control subjects performing a set of activities. In the second part, we tracked the arm use of 5 patients and 5 controls using two wrist-worn IMUs for 7 and 3 days, respectively. The IMU data was used to develop quantitative measures (total and relative arm use) and a visualization method for arm use. RESULTS: From the characterization study, we found that GM detects functional activities with 50–60% accuracy and eliminates non-functional activities with >90% accuracy. Continuous monitoring of arm use showed that the arm use was biased towards the dominant limb and less paretic limb for controls and patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The gross movement score has good specificity but low sensitivity in identifying functional activity. The at-home study showed that it is feasible to use two IMU-watches to monitor relative arm use and provided design considerations for improving the assessment method. Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/09/015648 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8273871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82738712021-07-20 Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units David, Ann ReethaJanetSureka, StephenSukumaran Gayathri, Sankaralingam Annamalai, Salai Jeyseelan Samuelkamleshkumar, Selvaraj Kuruvilla, Anju Magimairaj, Henry Prakash Varadhan, SKM Balasubramanian, Sivakumar J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Original Article INTRODUCTION: Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use. METHODS: In this two-part study, we first characterized the GM by comparing it to annotated video recordings of 5 hemiparetic patients and 10 control subjects performing a set of activities. In the second part, we tracked the arm use of 5 patients and 5 controls using two wrist-worn IMUs for 7 and 3 days, respectively. The IMU data was used to develop quantitative measures (total and relative arm use) and a visualization method for arm use. RESULTS: From the characterization study, we found that GM detects functional activities with 50–60% accuracy and eliminates non-functional activities with >90% accuracy. Continuous monitoring of arm use showed that the arm use was biased towards the dominant limb and less paretic limb for controls and patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The gross movement score has good specificity but low sensitivity in identifying functional activity. The at-home study showed that it is feasible to use two IMU-watches to monitor relative arm use and provided design considerations for improving the assessment method. Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/09/015648 SAGE Publications 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8273871/ /pubmed/34290880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019694 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article David, Ann ReethaJanetSureka, StephenSukumaran Gayathri, Sankaralingam Annamalai, Salai Jeyseelan Samuelkamleshkumar, Selvaraj Kuruvilla, Anju Magimairaj, Henry Prakash Varadhan, SKM Balasubramanian, Sivakumar Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units |
title | Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units |
title_full | Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units |
title_fullStr | Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units |
title_short | Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units |
title_sort | quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidann quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits AT reethajanetsurekastephensukumaran quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits AT gayathrisankaralingam quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits AT annamalaisalaijeyseelan quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits AT samuelkamleshkumarselvaraj quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits AT kuruvillaanju quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits AT magimairajhenryprakash quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits AT varadhanskm quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits AT balasubramaniansivakumar quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits |