Cargando…

Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units

INTRODUCTION: Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use. METHODS: In this two-part study, we first characterized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: David, Ann, ReethaJanetSureka, StephenSukumaran, Gayathri, Sankaralingam, Annamalai, Salai Jeyseelan, Samuelkamleshkumar, Selvaraj, Kuruvilla, Anju, Magimairaj, Henry Prakash, Varadhan, SKM, Balasubramanian, Sivakumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019694
_version_ 1783721458479923200
author David, Ann
ReethaJanetSureka, StephenSukumaran
Gayathri, Sankaralingam
Annamalai, Salai Jeyseelan
Samuelkamleshkumar, Selvaraj
Kuruvilla, Anju
Magimairaj, Henry Prakash
Varadhan, SKM
Balasubramanian, Sivakumar
author_facet David, Ann
ReethaJanetSureka, StephenSukumaran
Gayathri, Sankaralingam
Annamalai, Salai Jeyseelan
Samuelkamleshkumar, Selvaraj
Kuruvilla, Anju
Magimairaj, Henry Prakash
Varadhan, SKM
Balasubramanian, Sivakumar
author_sort David, Ann
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use. METHODS: In this two-part study, we first characterized the GM by comparing it to annotated video recordings of 5 hemiparetic patients and 10 control subjects performing a set of activities. In the second part, we tracked the arm use of 5 patients and 5 controls using two wrist-worn IMUs for 7 and 3 days, respectively. The IMU data was used to develop quantitative measures (total and relative arm use) and a visualization method for arm use. RESULTS: From the characterization study, we found that GM detects functional activities with 50–60% accuracy and eliminates non-functional activities with >90% accuracy. Continuous monitoring of arm use showed that the arm use was biased towards the dominant limb and less paretic limb for controls and patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The gross movement score has good specificity but low sensitivity in identifying functional activity. The at-home study showed that it is feasible to use two IMU-watches to monitor relative arm use and provided design considerations for improving the assessment method. Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/09/015648
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8273871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82738712021-07-20 Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units David, Ann ReethaJanetSureka, StephenSukumaran Gayathri, Sankaralingam Annamalai, Salai Jeyseelan Samuelkamleshkumar, Selvaraj Kuruvilla, Anju Magimairaj, Henry Prakash Varadhan, SKM Balasubramanian, Sivakumar J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Original Article INTRODUCTION: Accelerometry-based activity counting for measuring arm use is prone to overestimation due to non-functional movements. In this paper, we used an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based gross movement (GM) score to quantify arm use. METHODS: In this two-part study, we first characterized the GM by comparing it to annotated video recordings of 5 hemiparetic patients and 10 control subjects performing a set of activities. In the second part, we tracked the arm use of 5 patients and 5 controls using two wrist-worn IMUs for 7 and 3 days, respectively. The IMU data was used to develop quantitative measures (total and relative arm use) and a visualization method for arm use. RESULTS: From the characterization study, we found that GM detects functional activities with 50–60% accuracy and eliminates non-functional activities with >90% accuracy. Continuous monitoring of arm use showed that the arm use was biased towards the dominant limb and less paretic limb for controls and patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The gross movement score has good specificity but low sensitivity in identifying functional activity. The at-home study showed that it is feasible to use two IMU-watches to monitor relative arm use and provided design considerations for improving the assessment method. Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/09/015648 SAGE Publications 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8273871/ /pubmed/34290880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019694 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
David, Ann
ReethaJanetSureka, StephenSukumaran
Gayathri, Sankaralingam
Annamalai, Salai Jeyseelan
Samuelkamleshkumar, Selvaraj
Kuruvilla, Anju
Magimairaj, Henry Prakash
Varadhan, SKM
Balasubramanian, Sivakumar
Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units
title Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units
title_full Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units
title_fullStr Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units
title_short Quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units
title_sort quantification of the relative arm use in patients with hemiparesis using inertial measurement units
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20556683211019694
work_keys_str_mv AT davidann quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits
AT reethajanetsurekastephensukumaran quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits
AT gayathrisankaralingam quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits
AT annamalaisalaijeyseelan quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits
AT samuelkamleshkumarselvaraj quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits
AT kuruvillaanju quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits
AT magimairajhenryprakash quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits
AT varadhanskm quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits
AT balasubramaniansivakumar quantificationoftherelativearmuseinpatientswithhemiparesisusinginertialmeasurementunits