Cargando…
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol
BACKGROUND: For the treatment of radicular pain, nerve root infiltrations can be performed under MRI guidance in select, typically younger, patients where repeated CT exams are not desirable due to associated radiation risk, or potential allergic reactions to iodinated contrast medium. METHODS: Fift...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00641-0 |
_version_ | 1783721479505969152 |
---|---|
author | Scheffler, Max Guillemin, Pauline Coralie Lorton, Orane Maturana, Enrique Lauper, Nicolas Dominguez, Dennis E. Terraz, Sylvain Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre Salomir, Rares Boudabbous, Sana |
author_facet | Scheffler, Max Guillemin, Pauline Coralie Lorton, Orane Maturana, Enrique Lauper, Nicolas Dominguez, Dennis E. Terraz, Sylvain Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre Salomir, Rares Boudabbous, Sana |
author_sort | Scheffler, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For the treatment of radicular pain, nerve root infiltrations can be performed under MRI guidance in select, typically younger, patients where repeated CT exams are not desirable due to associated radiation risk, or potential allergic reactions to iodinated contrast medium. METHODS: Fifteen 3 T MRI-guided nerve root infiltrations were performed in 12 patients with a dedicated surface coil combined with the standard spine coil, using a breathhold PD sequence. The needle artifact on the MR images and the distance between the needle tip and the infiltrated nerve root were measured. RESULTS: The distance between the needle tip and the nerve root was 2.1 ± 1.4 mm. The visual artifact width, perpendicular to the needle long axis, was 2.1 ± 0.7 mm. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: This technical note describes the optimization of the procedure in a 3 T magnetic field, including reported procedure time and an assessment of targeting precision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8273984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82739842021-07-13 Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol Scheffler, Max Guillemin, Pauline Coralie Lorton, Orane Maturana, Enrique Lauper, Nicolas Dominguez, Dennis E. Terraz, Sylvain Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre Salomir, Rares Boudabbous, Sana BMC Med Imaging Technical Advance BACKGROUND: For the treatment of radicular pain, nerve root infiltrations can be performed under MRI guidance in select, typically younger, patients where repeated CT exams are not desirable due to associated radiation risk, or potential allergic reactions to iodinated contrast medium. METHODS: Fifteen 3 T MRI-guided nerve root infiltrations were performed in 12 patients with a dedicated surface coil combined with the standard spine coil, using a breathhold PD sequence. The needle artifact on the MR images and the distance between the needle tip and the infiltrated nerve root were measured. RESULTS: The distance between the needle tip and the nerve root was 2.1 ± 1.4 mm. The visual artifact width, perpendicular to the needle long axis, was 2.1 ± 0.7 mm. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: This technical note describes the optimization of the procedure in a 3 T magnetic field, including reported procedure time and an assessment of targeting precision. BioMed Central 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8273984/ /pubmed/34253181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00641-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Scheffler, Max Guillemin, Pauline Coralie Lorton, Orane Maturana, Enrique Lauper, Nicolas Dominguez, Dennis E. Terraz, Sylvain Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre Salomir, Rares Boudabbous, Sana Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol |
title_full | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol |
title_fullStr | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol |
title_short | Magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol |
title_sort | magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar nerve root infiltrations: optimization of an in-house protocol |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8273984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00641-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schefflermax magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol AT guilleminpaulinecoralie magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol AT lortonorane magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol AT maturanaenrique magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol AT laupernicolas magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol AT dominguezdennise magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol AT terrazsylvain magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol AT polettipierrealexandre magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol AT salomirrares magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol AT boudabboussana magneticresonanceimagingguidedlumbarnerverootinfiltrationsoptimizationofaninhouseprotocol |