Cargando…

Bacterial species-specific modulatory effects on phenotype and function of camel blood leukocytes

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported pathogen-species-specific modulating effects on the innate immune system. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus agalactiae are important pathogenic bacteria responsible for different infectious diseases in several animal species. In the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hussen, Jamal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34247606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02939-1
_version_ 1783721493921792000
author Hussen, Jamal
author_facet Hussen, Jamal
author_sort Hussen, Jamal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported pathogen-species-specific modulating effects on the innate immune system. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus agalactiae are important pathogenic bacteria responsible for different infectious diseases in several animal species. In the present study, a whole blood culture with S. aureus, E. coli, or S. agalactiae and flow cytometry were used to investigate, whether stimulation with different bacterial species induces different immunomodulation patterns in camel leukocytes. The expression of different cell surface myeloid markers and cell adhesion molecules on monocytes and neutrophils was investigated. In addition, the capacity of monocytes and neutrophils to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) was analyzed. RESULTS: Stimulation with either of the bacterial species resulted in the expansion of the camel CD14(high)MHCII(high) monocyte subset with a reduced fraction of CD14(high)MHCII(low) monocytes. For the CD14(low)MHCII(high) monocytes, however, only stimulation with S. aureus or S. agalactiae increased their fractions in blood. Although all bacterial species elicited the upregulation of cell surface MHC class II molecules on granulocytes, the increase was, however, highest on cells stimulated with S. aureus. The expression levels of the two adhesion molecules, CD11a and CD18, on neutrophils and monocytes were differently affected by bacterial stimulation. Functionally, E. coli failed to stimulate ROS production in monocytes, while induced a strong ROS production response in granulocytes. S. agalactiae elicited a week ROS production in granulocytes when compared to the other two pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: The different responsiveness of monocytes and granulocytes toward different bacterial species indicates different host-pathogen interaction mechanisms for the two cell populations. In addition, the phenotypic and functional differences between cells stimulated with E. coli, S. aureus, or S. agalactiae suggests pathogen-species-specific modulating effects of the bacterial pathogens on the camel innate myeloid cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8274054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82740542021-07-13 Bacterial species-specific modulatory effects on phenotype and function of camel blood leukocytes Hussen, Jamal BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported pathogen-species-specific modulating effects on the innate immune system. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus agalactiae are important pathogenic bacteria responsible for different infectious diseases in several animal species. In the present study, a whole blood culture with S. aureus, E. coli, or S. agalactiae and flow cytometry were used to investigate, whether stimulation with different bacterial species induces different immunomodulation patterns in camel leukocytes. The expression of different cell surface myeloid markers and cell adhesion molecules on monocytes and neutrophils was investigated. In addition, the capacity of monocytes and neutrophils to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) was analyzed. RESULTS: Stimulation with either of the bacterial species resulted in the expansion of the camel CD14(high)MHCII(high) monocyte subset with a reduced fraction of CD14(high)MHCII(low) monocytes. For the CD14(low)MHCII(high) monocytes, however, only stimulation with S. aureus or S. agalactiae increased their fractions in blood. Although all bacterial species elicited the upregulation of cell surface MHC class II molecules on granulocytes, the increase was, however, highest on cells stimulated with S. aureus. The expression levels of the two adhesion molecules, CD11a and CD18, on neutrophils and monocytes were differently affected by bacterial stimulation. Functionally, E. coli failed to stimulate ROS production in monocytes, while induced a strong ROS production response in granulocytes. S. agalactiae elicited a week ROS production in granulocytes when compared to the other two pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: The different responsiveness of monocytes and granulocytes toward different bacterial species indicates different host-pathogen interaction mechanisms for the two cell populations. In addition, the phenotypic and functional differences between cells stimulated with E. coli, S. aureus, or S. agalactiae suggests pathogen-species-specific modulating effects of the bacterial pathogens on the camel innate myeloid cells. BioMed Central 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8274054/ /pubmed/34247606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02939-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hussen, Jamal
Bacterial species-specific modulatory effects on phenotype and function of camel blood leukocytes
title Bacterial species-specific modulatory effects on phenotype and function of camel blood leukocytes
title_full Bacterial species-specific modulatory effects on phenotype and function of camel blood leukocytes
title_fullStr Bacterial species-specific modulatory effects on phenotype and function of camel blood leukocytes
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial species-specific modulatory effects on phenotype and function of camel blood leukocytes
title_short Bacterial species-specific modulatory effects on phenotype and function of camel blood leukocytes
title_sort bacterial species-specific modulatory effects on phenotype and function of camel blood leukocytes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34247606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02939-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hussenjamal bacterialspeciesspecificmodulatoryeffectsonphenotypeandfunctionofcamelbloodleukocytes