Cargando…

Biomechanical Effect of C(5)/C(6) Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion ‐ A Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical effect of different intervertebral reconstructive heights on adjacent segments following C(5)/C(6) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) through finite element analysis. METHODS: A finite element model of intact C(4)–C(7) segments was developed an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Jia‐ming, Guo, Xing, Kang, Liang, Zhao, Rui, Yang, Xiao‐tian, Fu, Yi‐bin, Xue, Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13010
_version_ 1783721511932133376
author Zhou, Jia‐ming
Guo, Xing
Kang, Liang
Zhao, Rui
Yang, Xiao‐tian
Fu, Yi‐bin
Xue, Yuan
author_facet Zhou, Jia‐ming
Guo, Xing
Kang, Liang
Zhao, Rui
Yang, Xiao‐tian
Fu, Yi‐bin
Xue, Yuan
author_sort Zhou, Jia‐ming
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical effect of different intervertebral reconstructive heights on adjacent segments following C(5)/C(6) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) through finite element analysis. METHODS: A finite element model of intact C(4)–C(7) segments was developed and validated for the present study. Five additional C(4)–C(7) postoperative models were constructed with 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, and 200% of the benchmark height of C(5)/C(6) on the basis of the intact model. The changes in intradiscal pressure (IDP) and range of motion (ROM) of adjacent segments before and after reconstruction of C(5)/C(6) were analyzed. RESULTS: For the upper adjacent segment (C(4)/C(5)), the IDPs under the different loading conditions all increased after reconstruction. The maximum IDPs were 0.387, 0.489, 0.491, and 0.472 MPa under flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending, respectively, observed at the reconstructive height of 200%. The minimum IDPs were observed at 150% reconstructive height under all loading conditions except extension, and were 57, 86 and 81% of the maximum IDPs under flexion, axial rotation, and lateral bending, respectively. The minimum IDP under extension occurred when the reconstructive height is 125% of the benchmark height. For the lower adjacent segment (C(6)/C(7)), the IDPs of postoperative models under all loading conditions also increased compared to the preoperative model. The maximum IDPs after reconstruction under flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending were 0.402, 0.411, 0.461, and 0.497 MPa, respectively, when the height of the reconstruction was 200% of the benchmark. The minimum IDPs were observed after a reconstruction at 150% of the benchmark, and were 59%, 85%, 82%, and 81% of the maximum IDPs under flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending loading conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The reconstructive height is an important factor affecting the IDP and the ROM of adjacent segments after ACDF. To delay the adjacent segment disease, an intervertebral reconstructive height of 150% is an appropriate height in C(5)/C(6) ACDF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8274176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82741762021-07-14 Biomechanical Effect of C(5)/C(6) Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion ‐ A Finite Element Analysis Zhou, Jia‐ming Guo, Xing Kang, Liang Zhao, Rui Yang, Xiao‐tian Fu, Yi‐bin Xue, Yuan Orthop Surg Scientific Articles OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanical effect of different intervertebral reconstructive heights on adjacent segments following C(5)/C(6) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) through finite element analysis. METHODS: A finite element model of intact C(4)–C(7) segments was developed and validated for the present study. Five additional C(4)–C(7) postoperative models were constructed with 100%, 125%, 150%, 175%, and 200% of the benchmark height of C(5)/C(6) on the basis of the intact model. The changes in intradiscal pressure (IDP) and range of motion (ROM) of adjacent segments before and after reconstruction of C(5)/C(6) were analyzed. RESULTS: For the upper adjacent segment (C(4)/C(5)), the IDPs under the different loading conditions all increased after reconstruction. The maximum IDPs were 0.387, 0.489, 0.491, and 0.472 MPa under flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending, respectively, observed at the reconstructive height of 200%. The minimum IDPs were observed at 150% reconstructive height under all loading conditions except extension, and were 57, 86 and 81% of the maximum IDPs under flexion, axial rotation, and lateral bending, respectively. The minimum IDP under extension occurred when the reconstructive height is 125% of the benchmark height. For the lower adjacent segment (C(6)/C(7)), the IDPs of postoperative models under all loading conditions also increased compared to the preoperative model. The maximum IDPs after reconstruction under flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending were 0.402, 0.411, 0.461, and 0.497 MPa, respectively, when the height of the reconstruction was 200% of the benchmark. The minimum IDPs were observed after a reconstruction at 150% of the benchmark, and were 59%, 85%, 82%, and 81% of the maximum IDPs under flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending loading conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The reconstructive height is an important factor affecting the IDP and the ROM of adjacent segments after ACDF. To delay the adjacent segment disease, an intervertebral reconstructive height of 150% is an appropriate height in C(5)/C(6) ACDF. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8274176/ /pubmed/33942538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13010 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Zhou, Jia‐ming
Guo, Xing
Kang, Liang
Zhao, Rui
Yang, Xiao‐tian
Fu, Yi‐bin
Xue, Yuan
Biomechanical Effect of C(5)/C(6) Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion ‐ A Finite Element Analysis
title Biomechanical Effect of C(5)/C(6) Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion ‐ A Finite Element Analysis
title_full Biomechanical Effect of C(5)/C(6) Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion ‐ A Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical Effect of C(5)/C(6) Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion ‐ A Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Effect of C(5)/C(6) Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion ‐ A Finite Element Analysis
title_short Biomechanical Effect of C(5)/C(6) Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion ‐ A Finite Element Analysis
title_sort biomechanical effect of c(5)/c(6) intervertebral reconstructive height on adjacent segments in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ‐ a finite element analysis
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13010
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujiaming biomechanicaleffectofc5c6intervertebralreconstructiveheightonadjacentsegmentsinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT guoxing biomechanicaleffectofc5c6intervertebralreconstructiveheightonadjacentsegmentsinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT kangliang biomechanicaleffectofc5c6intervertebralreconstructiveheightonadjacentsegmentsinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhaorui biomechanicaleffectofc5c6intervertebralreconstructiveheightonadjacentsegmentsinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT yangxiaotian biomechanicaleffectofc5c6intervertebralreconstructiveheightonadjacentsegmentsinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT fuyibin biomechanicaleffectofc5c6intervertebralreconstructiveheightonadjacentsegmentsinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementanalysis
AT xueyuan biomechanicaleffectofc5c6intervertebralreconstructiveheightonadjacentsegmentsinanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionafiniteelementanalysis