Cargando…

What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample

People use numerous metaphors to describe God. God is seen as a bearded man, light, and love. Based on metaphor theories, the metaphors people use to refer to God reflect how people think about God and could, in turn, reflect their worldview. However, little work has explored the common metaphors fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fetterman, Adam K., Evans, Nicholas D., Exline, Julie J., Meier, Brian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34252167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254626
_version_ 1783721619020054528
author Fetterman, Adam K.
Evans, Nicholas D.
Exline, Julie J.
Meier, Brian P.
author_facet Fetterman, Adam K.
Evans, Nicholas D.
Exline, Julie J.
Meier, Brian P.
author_sort Fetterman, Adam K.
collection PubMed
description People use numerous metaphors to describe God. God is seen as a bearded man, light, and love. Based on metaphor theories, the metaphors people use to refer to God reflect how people think about God and could, in turn, reflect their worldview. However, little work has explored the common metaphors for God. This was the purpose of the current investigation. Four trained raters coded open-ended responses from predominantly Christian U.S. undergraduates (N = 2,923) describing God for the presence or absence of numerous metaphoric categories. We then assessed the frequency of each of the metaphor categories. We identified 16 metaphor categories that were present in more than 1% of the responses. The top categories were “GOD IS POWER,” “GOD IS HUMAN,” and “GOD IS MALE.” These findings were similar across religious affiliations. We attempted to support our coding analysis using top-down and bottom-up automated language analysis. Results from these analyses provided added confidence to our conclusions. We discuss the implications of our findings and the potential for future studies investigating important psychological and behavioral outcomes of using different metaphors for God.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8274864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82748642021-07-27 What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample Fetterman, Adam K. Evans, Nicholas D. Exline, Julie J. Meier, Brian P. PLoS One Research Article People use numerous metaphors to describe God. God is seen as a bearded man, light, and love. Based on metaphor theories, the metaphors people use to refer to God reflect how people think about God and could, in turn, reflect their worldview. However, little work has explored the common metaphors for God. This was the purpose of the current investigation. Four trained raters coded open-ended responses from predominantly Christian U.S. undergraduates (N = 2,923) describing God for the presence or absence of numerous metaphoric categories. We then assessed the frequency of each of the metaphor categories. We identified 16 metaphor categories that were present in more than 1% of the responses. The top categories were “GOD IS POWER,” “GOD IS HUMAN,” and “GOD IS MALE.” These findings were similar across religious affiliations. We attempted to support our coding analysis using top-down and bottom-up automated language analysis. Results from these analyses provided added confidence to our conclusions. We discuss the implications of our findings and the potential for future studies investigating important psychological and behavioral outcomes of using different metaphors for God. Public Library of Science 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8274864/ /pubmed/34252167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254626 Text en © 2021 Fetterman et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fetterman, Adam K.
Evans, Nicholas D.
Exline, Julie J.
Meier, Brian P.
What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample
title What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample
title_full What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample
title_fullStr What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample
title_full_unstemmed What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample
title_short What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample
title_sort what shall we call god? an exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of god from a large u.s. undergraduate sample
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34252167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254626
work_keys_str_mv AT fettermanadamk whatshallwecallgodanexplorationofmetaphorscodedfromdescriptionsofgodfromalargeusundergraduatesample
AT evansnicholasd whatshallwecallgodanexplorationofmetaphorscodedfromdescriptionsofgodfromalargeusundergraduatesample
AT exlinejuliej whatshallwecallgodanexplorationofmetaphorscodedfromdescriptionsofgodfromalargeusundergraduatesample
AT meierbrianp whatshallwecallgodanexplorationofmetaphorscodedfromdescriptionsofgodfromalargeusundergraduatesample