Cargando…

Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with those of conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) for the treatment of unresectable HCC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 187 consecutive patients who received TACE p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Weihua, Chen, Lei, Cao, Yanyan, Sun, Bo, Ren, Yanqiao, Sun, Tao, Zheng, Chuansheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262347
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S314762
_version_ 1783721647011790848
author Zhang, Weihua
Chen, Lei
Cao, Yanyan
Sun, Bo
Ren, Yanqiao
Sun, Tao
Zheng, Chuansheng
author_facet Zhang, Weihua
Chen, Lei
Cao, Yanyan
Sun, Bo
Ren, Yanqiao
Sun, Tao
Zheng, Chuansheng
author_sort Zhang, Weihua
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with those of conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) for the treatment of unresectable HCC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 187 consecutive patients who received TACE plus apatinib in our institution from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2019. Among them, 91 patients received C-TACE-A, and 96 patients received D-TACE-A. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Before PSM, the median OS was 15 months (95% CI: 12.5–17.5) and 13 months (95% CI: 11.1–14.9; P=0.480) in the C-TACE-A and D-TACE-A groups, respectively. The median PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 5.9–8.1) in the C-TACE-A group and 7 months (95% CI: 5.6–8.4; p=0.677) in the D-TACE-A group. The DCR was 81.3% in the C-TACE-A group and 72.9% in the D-TACE-A group. Cox regression analysis showed that D-TACE-A did not increase mortality risk or tumor recurrence risk. After PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in median OS or PFS between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, after adjusting for relative factors, D-TACE-A increased the mortality risk more than C-TACE-A in patients with BCLC stage C (HR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.129–2.495; P=0.011), but D-TACE-A lowered the tumor recurrence risk compared with C-TACE-A in patients with Child–Pugh B (HR: 0.210, 95% CI: 0.082–0.538; P=0.001) and cirrhosis (HR: 0.481, 95% CI: 0.293–0.791; P=0.004). Grade III and IV adverse events in patients with D-TACE-A were similar to those in patients treated with C-TACE-A (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with unresectable HCC treated with D-TACE-A might not show increased survival compared with patients treated with C-TACE-A. Advanced HCC patients without cirrhosis may receive greater survival benefits from C-TACE-A than D-TACE-A.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8275036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82750362021-07-13 Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Zhang, Weihua Chen, Lei Cao, Yanyan Sun, Bo Ren, Yanqiao Sun, Tao Zheng, Chuansheng Cancer Manag Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with those of conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) for the treatment of unresectable HCC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 187 consecutive patients who received TACE plus apatinib in our institution from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2019. Among them, 91 patients received C-TACE-A, and 96 patients received D-TACE-A. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Before PSM, the median OS was 15 months (95% CI: 12.5–17.5) and 13 months (95% CI: 11.1–14.9; P=0.480) in the C-TACE-A and D-TACE-A groups, respectively. The median PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 5.9–8.1) in the C-TACE-A group and 7 months (95% CI: 5.6–8.4; p=0.677) in the D-TACE-A group. The DCR was 81.3% in the C-TACE-A group and 72.9% in the D-TACE-A group. Cox regression analysis showed that D-TACE-A did not increase mortality risk or tumor recurrence risk. After PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in median OS or PFS between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, after adjusting for relative factors, D-TACE-A increased the mortality risk more than C-TACE-A in patients with BCLC stage C (HR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.129–2.495; P=0.011), but D-TACE-A lowered the tumor recurrence risk compared with C-TACE-A in patients with Child–Pugh B (HR: 0.210, 95% CI: 0.082–0.538; P=0.001) and cirrhosis (HR: 0.481, 95% CI: 0.293–0.791; P=0.004). Grade III and IV adverse events in patients with D-TACE-A were similar to those in patients treated with C-TACE-A (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with unresectable HCC treated with D-TACE-A might not show increased survival compared with patients treated with C-TACE-A. Advanced HCC patients without cirrhosis may receive greater survival benefits from C-TACE-A than D-TACE-A. Dove 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8275036/ /pubmed/34262347 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S314762 Text en © 2021 Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Weihua
Chen, Lei
Cao, Yanyan
Sun, Bo
Ren, Yanqiao
Sun, Tao
Zheng, Chuansheng
Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort efficacy of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib compared with conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262347
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S314762
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangweihua efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chenlei efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT caoyanyan efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT sunbo efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT renyanqiao efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT suntao efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT zhengchuansheng efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma