Cargando…
Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with those of conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) for the treatment of unresectable HCC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 187 consecutive patients who received TACE p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262347 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S314762 |
_version_ | 1783721647011790848 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Weihua Chen, Lei Cao, Yanyan Sun, Bo Ren, Yanqiao Sun, Tao Zheng, Chuansheng |
author_facet | Zhang, Weihua Chen, Lei Cao, Yanyan Sun, Bo Ren, Yanqiao Sun, Tao Zheng, Chuansheng |
author_sort | Zhang, Weihua |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with those of conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) for the treatment of unresectable HCC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 187 consecutive patients who received TACE plus apatinib in our institution from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2019. Among them, 91 patients received C-TACE-A, and 96 patients received D-TACE-A. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Before PSM, the median OS was 15 months (95% CI: 12.5–17.5) and 13 months (95% CI: 11.1–14.9; P=0.480) in the C-TACE-A and D-TACE-A groups, respectively. The median PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 5.9–8.1) in the C-TACE-A group and 7 months (95% CI: 5.6–8.4; p=0.677) in the D-TACE-A group. The DCR was 81.3% in the C-TACE-A group and 72.9% in the D-TACE-A group. Cox regression analysis showed that D-TACE-A did not increase mortality risk or tumor recurrence risk. After PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in median OS or PFS between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, after adjusting for relative factors, D-TACE-A increased the mortality risk more than C-TACE-A in patients with BCLC stage C (HR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.129–2.495; P=0.011), but D-TACE-A lowered the tumor recurrence risk compared with C-TACE-A in patients with Child–Pugh B (HR: 0.210, 95% CI: 0.082–0.538; P=0.001) and cirrhosis (HR: 0.481, 95% CI: 0.293–0.791; P=0.004). Grade III and IV adverse events in patients with D-TACE-A were similar to those in patients treated with C-TACE-A (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with unresectable HCC treated with D-TACE-A might not show increased survival compared with patients treated with C-TACE-A. Advanced HCC patients without cirrhosis may receive greater survival benefits from C-TACE-A than D-TACE-A. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8275036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82750362021-07-13 Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Zhang, Weihua Chen, Lei Cao, Yanyan Sun, Bo Ren, Yanqiao Sun, Tao Zheng, Chuansheng Cancer Manag Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with those of conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) for the treatment of unresectable HCC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 187 consecutive patients who received TACE plus apatinib in our institution from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2019. Among them, 91 patients received C-TACE-A, and 96 patients received D-TACE-A. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Before PSM, the median OS was 15 months (95% CI: 12.5–17.5) and 13 months (95% CI: 11.1–14.9; P=0.480) in the C-TACE-A and D-TACE-A groups, respectively. The median PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 5.9–8.1) in the C-TACE-A group and 7 months (95% CI: 5.6–8.4; p=0.677) in the D-TACE-A group. The DCR was 81.3% in the C-TACE-A group and 72.9% in the D-TACE-A group. Cox regression analysis showed that D-TACE-A did not increase mortality risk or tumor recurrence risk. After PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in median OS or PFS between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, after adjusting for relative factors, D-TACE-A increased the mortality risk more than C-TACE-A in patients with BCLC stage C (HR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.129–2.495; P=0.011), but D-TACE-A lowered the tumor recurrence risk compared with C-TACE-A in patients with Child–Pugh B (HR: 0.210, 95% CI: 0.082–0.538; P=0.001) and cirrhosis (HR: 0.481, 95% CI: 0.293–0.791; P=0.004). Grade III and IV adverse events in patients with D-TACE-A were similar to those in patients treated with C-TACE-A (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with unresectable HCC treated with D-TACE-A might not show increased survival compared with patients treated with C-TACE-A. Advanced HCC patients without cirrhosis may receive greater survival benefits from C-TACE-A than D-TACE-A. Dove 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8275036/ /pubmed/34262347 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S314762 Text en © 2021 Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zhang, Weihua Chen, Lei Cao, Yanyan Sun, Bo Ren, Yanqiao Sun, Tao Zheng, Chuansheng Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title | Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full | Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_short | Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_sort | efficacy of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib compared with conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262347 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S314762 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangweihua efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT chenlei efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT caoyanyan efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT sunbo efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT renyanqiao efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT suntao efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma AT zhengchuansheng efficacyofdrugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibcomparedwithconventionaltransarterialchemoembolizationplusapatinibinthetreatmentofunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma |