Cargando…
What outcomes should be evaluated in critically ill patients?
Randomized clinical trials in intensive care prioritize disease-focused outcomes rather than patient-centered outcomes. A paradigm shift considering the evaluation of measures after hospital discharge and measures focused on quality of life and common symptoms, such as pain and dyspnea, could better...
Autores principales: | Teixeira, Cassiano, Kern, Marcelo, Rosa, Regis Goulart |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34231813 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20210040 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Post-intensive care outpatient clinic: is it feasible and effective?
A literature review
por: Teixeira, Cassiano, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Acute respiratory distress syndrome: how do patients fare after the intensive care unit?
por: de Oliveira, Roselaine Pinheiro, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Association of Burnout With Depression and Anxiety in Critical Care Clinicians in Brazil
por: Fischer, Ronald, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
What should be the best dialysis catheter lock in critically ill patients?
por: Honore, Patrick M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Does SOFA predict outcomes better than SIRS in Brazilian ICU patients with suspected infection? A retrospective cohort study
por: Rosa, Regis Goulart, et al.
Publicado: (2017)