Cargando…

Comparison of Consistency, Feasibility, and Convenience of a Novel Compact System for Assessing Lung Volumes and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity versus Whole Body Plethysmography

BACKGROUND: The MiniBox+™ is an innovative technique for assessing lung volumes (LVs) and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco). Differently from the equipment needed for whole body plethysmography (WBP), the MiniBox+ is a small, transportable instrument, which derives total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dal Negro, Roberto W, Turco, Paola, Povero, Massimiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262309
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S316529
_version_ 1783721666910617600
author Dal Negro, Roberto W
Turco, Paola
Povero, Massimiliano
author_facet Dal Negro, Roberto W
Turco, Paola
Povero, Massimiliano
author_sort Dal Negro, Roberto W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The MiniBox+™ is an innovative technique for assessing lung volumes (LVs) and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco). Differently from the equipment needed for whole body plethysmography (WBP), the MiniBox+ is a small, transportable instrument, which derives total lung capacity (TLC) during tidal breathing by analyzing gas pressures and airflows immediately preceding and immediately following airway occlusions. AIM: To compare the consistency and the feasibility of LV and DLco measurements between the two instruments in different lung function disorders, and their cost of execution. METHODS: Consecutive patients of both genders with obstructive and restrictive respiratory disorders were randomly recruited. LVs and DLco were measured by a randomized sequence. The failure risk, number of attempts to achieve the first reliable measurement, corresponding time spent, and costs per patient were compared. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were enrolled: 42 asthmatics (32.1%), and 47 patients with obstructive (35.1%) and 44 with restrictive respiratory disorders (32.8%). The overall failure risk was 19.4% for WBP and 8.2% for the MiniBox+ (risk ratio=0.417, 95% CI 0.242 to 0.72). LVs and DLco values proved equal with both techniques, regardless of the patients’ age, sex, schooling level, and initial lung disorder. Number of attempts and total time spent in achieving the first reliable measurement were significantly lower with the MiniBox+. Mean cost per patient was €87.58 with WBP and €75.11 with the MiniBox+, with a mean saving of €12.33 (95% CI 5.93 to 18.73), mainly due to the saving in productivity loss. CONCLUSION: LV and DLco measurements with the MiniBox+ were highly consistent with those obtained with WBP. The MiniBox+ proved easier to use (lower failure risk) and more convenient (lower execution costs) than WBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8275122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82751222021-07-13 Comparison of Consistency, Feasibility, and Convenience of a Novel Compact System for Assessing Lung Volumes and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity versus Whole Body Plethysmography Dal Negro, Roberto W Turco, Paola Povero, Massimiliano Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The MiniBox+™ is an innovative technique for assessing lung volumes (LVs) and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco). Differently from the equipment needed for whole body plethysmography (WBP), the MiniBox+ is a small, transportable instrument, which derives total lung capacity (TLC) during tidal breathing by analyzing gas pressures and airflows immediately preceding and immediately following airway occlusions. AIM: To compare the consistency and the feasibility of LV and DLco measurements between the two instruments in different lung function disorders, and their cost of execution. METHODS: Consecutive patients of both genders with obstructive and restrictive respiratory disorders were randomly recruited. LVs and DLco were measured by a randomized sequence. The failure risk, number of attempts to achieve the first reliable measurement, corresponding time spent, and costs per patient were compared. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were enrolled: 42 asthmatics (32.1%), and 47 patients with obstructive (35.1%) and 44 with restrictive respiratory disorders (32.8%). The overall failure risk was 19.4% for WBP and 8.2% for the MiniBox+ (risk ratio=0.417, 95% CI 0.242 to 0.72). LVs and DLco values proved equal with both techniques, regardless of the patients’ age, sex, schooling level, and initial lung disorder. Number of attempts and total time spent in achieving the first reliable measurement were significantly lower with the MiniBox+. Mean cost per patient was €87.58 with WBP and €75.11 with the MiniBox+, with a mean saving of €12.33 (95% CI 5.93 to 18.73), mainly due to the saving in productivity loss. CONCLUSION: LV and DLco measurements with the MiniBox+ were highly consistent with those obtained with WBP. The MiniBox+ proved easier to use (lower failure risk) and more convenient (lower execution costs) than WBP. Dove 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8275122/ /pubmed/34262309 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S316529 Text en © 2021 Dal Negro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Dal Negro, Roberto W
Turco, Paola
Povero, Massimiliano
Comparison of Consistency, Feasibility, and Convenience of a Novel Compact System for Assessing Lung Volumes and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity versus Whole Body Plethysmography
title Comparison of Consistency, Feasibility, and Convenience of a Novel Compact System for Assessing Lung Volumes and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity versus Whole Body Plethysmography
title_full Comparison of Consistency, Feasibility, and Convenience of a Novel Compact System for Assessing Lung Volumes and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity versus Whole Body Plethysmography
title_fullStr Comparison of Consistency, Feasibility, and Convenience of a Novel Compact System for Assessing Lung Volumes and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity versus Whole Body Plethysmography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Consistency, Feasibility, and Convenience of a Novel Compact System for Assessing Lung Volumes and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity versus Whole Body Plethysmography
title_short Comparison of Consistency, Feasibility, and Convenience of a Novel Compact System for Assessing Lung Volumes and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity versus Whole Body Plethysmography
title_sort comparison of consistency, feasibility, and convenience of a novel compact system for assessing lung volumes and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity versus whole body plethysmography
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34262309
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S316529
work_keys_str_mv AT dalnegrorobertow comparisonofconsistencyfeasibilityandconvenienceofanovelcompactsystemforassessinglungvolumesandcarbonmonoxidediffusingcapacityversuswholebodyplethysmography
AT turcopaola comparisonofconsistencyfeasibilityandconvenienceofanovelcompactsystemforassessinglungvolumesandcarbonmonoxidediffusingcapacityversuswholebodyplethysmography
AT poveromassimiliano comparisonofconsistencyfeasibilityandconvenienceofanovelcompactsystemforassessinglungvolumesandcarbonmonoxidediffusingcapacityversuswholebodyplethysmography