Cargando…

Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study

OBJECTIVES: The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors is a significant concern. Due to the emergence of multiple pandemic waves, longitudinal data on the impact of COVID-19 are vital to ensure an adequate psychological care response. The primary aim was to assess the prevalence an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Tom, Daniels, Jo, Hulme, William, Hirst, Robert, Horner, Daniel, Lyttle, Mark David, Samuel, Katie, Graham, Blair, Reynard, Charles, Barrett, Michael, Foley, James, Cronin, John, Umana, Etimbuk, Vinagre, Joao, Carlton, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049680
_version_ 1783721698397257728
author Roberts, Tom
Daniels, Jo
Hulme, William
Hirst, Robert
Horner, Daniel
Lyttle, Mark David
Samuel, Katie
Graham, Blair
Reynard, Charles
Barrett, Michael
Foley, James
Cronin, John
Umana, Etimbuk
Vinagre, Joao
Carlton, Edward
author_facet Roberts, Tom
Daniels, Jo
Hulme, William
Hirst, Robert
Horner, Daniel
Lyttle, Mark David
Samuel, Katie
Graham, Blair
Reynard, Charles
Barrett, Michael
Foley, James
Cronin, John
Umana, Etimbuk
Vinagre, Joao
Carlton, Edward
author_sort Roberts, Tom
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors is a significant concern. Due to the emergence of multiple pandemic waves, longitudinal data on the impact of COVID-19 are vital to ensure an adequate psychological care response. The primary aim was to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma in frontline doctors during the acceleration, peak and deceleration of the COVID-19 first wave. Personal and professional factors associated with psychological distress are also reported. DESIGN: A prospective online three-part longitudinal survey. SETTING: Acute hospitals in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Frontline doctors working in emergency medicine, anaesthetics and intensive care medicine during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological distress and trauma measured using the General Health Questionnaire-12 and the Impact of Events-Revised. RESULTS: The initial acceleration survey distributed across networks generated a sample of 5440 doctors. Peak and deceleration response rates from the original sample were 71.6% (n=3896) and 56.6% (n=3079), respectively. Prevalence of psychological distress was 44.7% (n=1334) during the acceleration, 36.9% (n=1098) at peak and 31.5% (n=918) at the deceleration phase. The prevalence of trauma was 23.7% (n=647) at peak and 17.7% (n=484) at deceleration. The prevalence of probable post-traumatic stress disorder was 12.6% (n=343) at peak and 10.1% (n=276) at deceleration. Worry of family infection due to clinical work was the factor most strongly associated with both distress (R(2)=0.06) and trauma (R(2)=0.10). CONCLUSION: Findings reflect a pattern of elevated distress at acceleration and peak, with some natural recovery. It is essential that policymakers seek to prevent future adverse effects through (a) provision of vital equipment to mitigate physical and psychological harm, (b) increased awareness and recognition of signs of psychological distress and (c) the development of clear pathways to effective psychological care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8275363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82753632021-07-15 Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Hirst, Robert Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Foley, James Cronin, John Umana, Etimbuk Vinagre, Joao Carlton, Edward BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors is a significant concern. Due to the emergence of multiple pandemic waves, longitudinal data on the impact of COVID-19 are vital to ensure an adequate psychological care response. The primary aim was to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma in frontline doctors during the acceleration, peak and deceleration of the COVID-19 first wave. Personal and professional factors associated with psychological distress are also reported. DESIGN: A prospective online three-part longitudinal survey. SETTING: Acute hospitals in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Frontline doctors working in emergency medicine, anaesthetics and intensive care medicine during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological distress and trauma measured using the General Health Questionnaire-12 and the Impact of Events-Revised. RESULTS: The initial acceleration survey distributed across networks generated a sample of 5440 doctors. Peak and deceleration response rates from the original sample were 71.6% (n=3896) and 56.6% (n=3079), respectively. Prevalence of psychological distress was 44.7% (n=1334) during the acceleration, 36.9% (n=1098) at peak and 31.5% (n=918) at the deceleration phase. The prevalence of trauma was 23.7% (n=647) at peak and 17.7% (n=484) at deceleration. The prevalence of probable post-traumatic stress disorder was 12.6% (n=343) at peak and 10.1% (n=276) at deceleration. Worry of family infection due to clinical work was the factor most strongly associated with both distress (R(2)=0.06) and trauma (R(2)=0.10). CONCLUSION: Findings reflect a pattern of elevated distress at acceleration and peak, with some natural recovery. It is essential that policymakers seek to prevent future adverse effects through (a) provision of vital equipment to mitigate physical and psychological harm, (b) increased awareness and recognition of signs of psychological distress and (c) the development of clear pathways to effective psychological care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8275363/ /pubmed/34244282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049680 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Roberts, Tom
Daniels, Jo
Hulme, William
Hirst, Robert
Horner, Daniel
Lyttle, Mark David
Samuel, Katie
Graham, Blair
Reynard, Charles
Barrett, Michael
Foley, James
Cronin, John
Umana, Etimbuk
Vinagre, Joao
Carlton, Edward
Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study
title Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study
title_full Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study
title_fullStr Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study
title_short Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study
title_sort psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the covid-19 pandemic in the united kingdom and ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049680
work_keys_str_mv AT robertstom psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT danielsjo psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT hulmewilliam psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT hirstrobert psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT hornerdaniel psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT lyttlemarkdavid psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT samuelkatie psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT grahamblair psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT reynardcharles psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT barrettmichael psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT foleyjames psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT croninjohn psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT umanaetimbuk psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT vinagrejoao psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT carltonedward psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy
AT psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy