Cargando…
Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study
OBJECTIVES: The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors is a significant concern. Due to the emergence of multiple pandemic waves, longitudinal data on the impact of COVID-19 are vital to ensure an adequate psychological care response. The primary aim was to assess the prevalence an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049680 |
_version_ | 1783721698397257728 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Hirst, Robert Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Foley, James Cronin, John Umana, Etimbuk Vinagre, Joao Carlton, Edward |
author_facet | Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Hirst, Robert Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Foley, James Cronin, John Umana, Etimbuk Vinagre, Joao Carlton, Edward |
author_sort | Roberts, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors is a significant concern. Due to the emergence of multiple pandemic waves, longitudinal data on the impact of COVID-19 are vital to ensure an adequate psychological care response. The primary aim was to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma in frontline doctors during the acceleration, peak and deceleration of the COVID-19 first wave. Personal and professional factors associated with psychological distress are also reported. DESIGN: A prospective online three-part longitudinal survey. SETTING: Acute hospitals in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Frontline doctors working in emergency medicine, anaesthetics and intensive care medicine during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological distress and trauma measured using the General Health Questionnaire-12 and the Impact of Events-Revised. RESULTS: The initial acceleration survey distributed across networks generated a sample of 5440 doctors. Peak and deceleration response rates from the original sample were 71.6% (n=3896) and 56.6% (n=3079), respectively. Prevalence of psychological distress was 44.7% (n=1334) during the acceleration, 36.9% (n=1098) at peak and 31.5% (n=918) at the deceleration phase. The prevalence of trauma was 23.7% (n=647) at peak and 17.7% (n=484) at deceleration. The prevalence of probable post-traumatic stress disorder was 12.6% (n=343) at peak and 10.1% (n=276) at deceleration. Worry of family infection due to clinical work was the factor most strongly associated with both distress (R(2)=0.06) and trauma (R(2)=0.10). CONCLUSION: Findings reflect a pattern of elevated distress at acceleration and peak, with some natural recovery. It is essential that policymakers seek to prevent future adverse effects through (a) provision of vital equipment to mitigate physical and psychological harm, (b) increased awareness and recognition of signs of psychological distress and (c) the development of clear pathways to effective psychological care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8275363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82753632021-07-15 Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Hirst, Robert Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Foley, James Cronin, John Umana, Etimbuk Vinagre, Joao Carlton, Edward BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors is a significant concern. Due to the emergence of multiple pandemic waves, longitudinal data on the impact of COVID-19 are vital to ensure an adequate psychological care response. The primary aim was to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma in frontline doctors during the acceleration, peak and deceleration of the COVID-19 first wave. Personal and professional factors associated with psychological distress are also reported. DESIGN: A prospective online three-part longitudinal survey. SETTING: Acute hospitals in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Frontline doctors working in emergency medicine, anaesthetics and intensive care medicine during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological distress and trauma measured using the General Health Questionnaire-12 and the Impact of Events-Revised. RESULTS: The initial acceleration survey distributed across networks generated a sample of 5440 doctors. Peak and deceleration response rates from the original sample were 71.6% (n=3896) and 56.6% (n=3079), respectively. Prevalence of psychological distress was 44.7% (n=1334) during the acceleration, 36.9% (n=1098) at peak and 31.5% (n=918) at the deceleration phase. The prevalence of trauma was 23.7% (n=647) at peak and 17.7% (n=484) at deceleration. The prevalence of probable post-traumatic stress disorder was 12.6% (n=343) at peak and 10.1% (n=276) at deceleration. Worry of family infection due to clinical work was the factor most strongly associated with both distress (R(2)=0.06) and trauma (R(2)=0.10). CONCLUSION: Findings reflect a pattern of elevated distress at acceleration and peak, with some natural recovery. It is essential that policymakers seek to prevent future adverse effects through (a) provision of vital equipment to mitigate physical and psychological harm, (b) increased awareness and recognition of signs of psychological distress and (c) the development of clear pathways to effective psychological care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8275363/ /pubmed/34244282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049680 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Hirst, Robert Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Foley, James Cronin, John Umana, Etimbuk Vinagre, Joao Carlton, Edward Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study |
title | Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study |
title_full | Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study |
title_fullStr | Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study |
title_short | Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study |
title_sort | psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the covid-19 pandemic in the united kingdom and ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertstom psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT danielsjo psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT hulmewilliam psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT hirstrobert psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT hornerdaniel psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT lyttlemarkdavid psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT samuelkatie psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT grahamblair psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT reynardcharles psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT barrettmichael psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT foleyjames psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT croninjohn psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT umanaetimbuk psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT vinagrejoao psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT carltonedward psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy AT psychologicaldistressandtraumaindoctorsprovidingfrontlinecareduringthecovid19pandemicintheunitedkingdomandirelandaprospectivelongitudinalsurveycohortstudy |