Cargando…

Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines

OBJECTIVE: Countries have major differences in the acceptance of face mask use for the prevention of COVID-19. This work aims at studying the information online in different countries in terms of information quality and content. DESIGN: Content analysis. METHOD: We analysed 450 webpages returned by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehta, Shaily, Ghezzi, Daria, Catalani, Alessia, Vanzolini, Tania, Ghezzi, Pietro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046364
_version_ 1783721699626188800
author Mehta, Shaily
Ghezzi, Daria
Catalani, Alessia
Vanzolini, Tania
Ghezzi, Pietro
author_facet Mehta, Shaily
Ghezzi, Daria
Catalani, Alessia
Vanzolini, Tania
Ghezzi, Pietro
author_sort Mehta, Shaily
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Countries have major differences in the acceptance of face mask use for the prevention of COVID-19. This work aims at studying the information online in different countries in terms of information quality and content. DESIGN: Content analysis. METHOD: We analysed 450 webpages returned by searching the string ‘are face masks dangerous’ in Italy, the UK and the USA using three search engines (Bing, Duckduckgo and Google) in August 2020. The type of website and the stance about masks were assessed by two raters for each language and inter-rater agreement reported as Cohen’s kappa. The text of the webpages was collected from the web using WebBootCaT and analysed using a corpus analysis software to identify issues mentioned. RESULTS: Most pages were news outlets, and few (2%–6%) from public health agencies. Webpages with a negative stance on masks were more frequent in Italian (28%) than English (19%). Google returned the highest number of mask-positive pages and Duckduckgo the lowest. Google also returned the lowest number of pages mentioning conspiracy theories and Duckduckgo the highest. Webpages in Italian scored lower than those in English in transparency (reporting authors, their credentials and backing the information with references). When issues about the use of face masks were analysed, mask effectiveness was the most discussed followed by hypercapnia (accumulation of carbon dioxide), contraindication in respiratory disease and hypoxia, with issues related to their contraindications in mental health conditions and disability mentioned by very few pages. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that: (1) public health agencies should increase their web presence in providing correct information on face masks; (2) search engines should improve the information quality criteria in their ranking; (3) the public should be more informed on issues related to the use of masks and disabilities, mental health and stigma arising for those people who cannot wear masks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8275368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82753682021-07-15 Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines Mehta, Shaily Ghezzi, Daria Catalani, Alessia Vanzolini, Tania Ghezzi, Pietro BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: Countries have major differences in the acceptance of face mask use for the prevention of COVID-19. This work aims at studying the information online in different countries in terms of information quality and content. DESIGN: Content analysis. METHOD: We analysed 450 webpages returned by searching the string ‘are face masks dangerous’ in Italy, the UK and the USA using three search engines (Bing, Duckduckgo and Google) in August 2020. The type of website and the stance about masks were assessed by two raters for each language and inter-rater agreement reported as Cohen’s kappa. The text of the webpages was collected from the web using WebBootCaT and analysed using a corpus analysis software to identify issues mentioned. RESULTS: Most pages were news outlets, and few (2%–6%) from public health agencies. Webpages with a negative stance on masks were more frequent in Italian (28%) than English (19%). Google returned the highest number of mask-positive pages and Duckduckgo the lowest. Google also returned the lowest number of pages mentioning conspiracy theories and Duckduckgo the highest. Webpages in Italian scored lower than those in English in transparency (reporting authors, their credentials and backing the information with references). When issues about the use of face masks were analysed, mask effectiveness was the most discussed followed by hypercapnia (accumulation of carbon dioxide), contraindication in respiratory disease and hypoxia, with issues related to their contraindications in mental health conditions and disability mentioned by very few pages. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that: (1) public health agencies should increase their web presence in providing correct information on face masks; (2) search engines should improve the information quality criteria in their ranking; (3) the public should be more informed on issues related to the use of masks and disabilities, mental health and stigma arising for those people who cannot wear masks. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8275368/ /pubmed/34244263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046364 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Mehta, Shaily
Ghezzi, Daria
Catalani, Alessia
Vanzolini, Tania
Ghezzi, Pietro
Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines
title Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines
title_full Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines
title_fullStr Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines
title_full_unstemmed Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines
title_short Online information on face masks: analysis of websites in Italian and English returned by different search engines
title_sort online information on face masks: analysis of websites in italian and english returned by different search engines
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34244263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046364
work_keys_str_mv AT mehtashaily onlineinformationonfacemasksanalysisofwebsitesinitalianandenglishreturnedbydifferentsearchengines
AT ghezzidaria onlineinformationonfacemasksanalysisofwebsitesinitalianandenglishreturnedbydifferentsearchengines
AT catalanialessia onlineinformationonfacemasksanalysisofwebsitesinitalianandenglishreturnedbydifferentsearchengines
AT vanzolinitania onlineinformationonfacemasksanalysisofwebsitesinitalianandenglishreturnedbydifferentsearchengines
AT ghezzipietro onlineinformationonfacemasksanalysisofwebsitesinitalianandenglishreturnedbydifferentsearchengines