Cargando…

Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability

The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reis, Katherine S., Heald, Shannon L. M., Veillette, John P., Van Hedger, Stephen C., Nusbaum, Howard C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7
_version_ 1783721764857053184
author Reis, Katherine S.
Heald, Shannon L. M.
Veillette, John P.
Van Hedger, Stephen C.
Nusbaum, Howard C.
author_facet Reis, Katherine S.
Heald, Shannon L. M.
Veillette, John P.
Van Hedger, Stephen C.
Nusbaum, Howard C.
author_sort Reis, Katherine S.
collection PubMed
description The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early sensory encoding have measurable effects on human performance. Absolute pitch (AP), the rare ability to label musical notes without reference notes, provides an excellent model system for testing how early neural encoding supports specialized auditory skills. Results show that the FFR predicts pitch labelling performance better than traditional measures related to AP (age of music onset, tonal language experience, pitch adjustment and just-noticeable-difference scores). Moreover, the stimulus type used to elicit the FFR (tones or speech) impacts predictive performance in a manner that is consistent with prior research. Additionally, the FFR predicts labelling performance for piano tones better than unfamiliar sine tones. Taken together, the FFR reliably distinguishes individuals based on their explicit pitch labeling abilities, which highlights the complex dynamics between sensory processing and cognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8275664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82756642021-07-13 Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability Reis, Katherine S. Heald, Shannon L. M. Veillette, John P. Van Hedger, Stephen C. Nusbaum, Howard C. Sci Rep Article The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early sensory encoding have measurable effects on human performance. Absolute pitch (AP), the rare ability to label musical notes without reference notes, provides an excellent model system for testing how early neural encoding supports specialized auditory skills. Results show that the FFR predicts pitch labelling performance better than traditional measures related to AP (age of music onset, tonal language experience, pitch adjustment and just-noticeable-difference scores). Moreover, the stimulus type used to elicit the FFR (tones or speech) impacts predictive performance in a manner that is consistent with prior research. Additionally, the FFR predicts labelling performance for piano tones better than unfamiliar sine tones. Taken together, the FFR reliably distinguishes individuals based on their explicit pitch labeling abilities, which highlights the complex dynamics between sensory processing and cognition. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8275664/ /pubmed/34253760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Reis, Katherine S.
Heald, Shannon L. M.
Veillette, John P.
Van Hedger, Stephen C.
Nusbaum, Howard C.
Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_full Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_fullStr Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_short Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_sort individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7
work_keys_str_mv AT reiskatherines individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability
AT healdshannonlm individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability
AT veillettejohnp individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability
AT vanhedgerstephenc individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability
AT nusbaumhowardc individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability