Cargando…
Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7 |
_version_ | 1783721764857053184 |
---|---|
author | Reis, Katherine S. Heald, Shannon L. M. Veillette, John P. Van Hedger, Stephen C. Nusbaum, Howard C. |
author_facet | Reis, Katherine S. Heald, Shannon L. M. Veillette, John P. Van Hedger, Stephen C. Nusbaum, Howard C. |
author_sort | Reis, Katherine S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early sensory encoding have measurable effects on human performance. Absolute pitch (AP), the rare ability to label musical notes without reference notes, provides an excellent model system for testing how early neural encoding supports specialized auditory skills. Results show that the FFR predicts pitch labelling performance better than traditional measures related to AP (age of music onset, tonal language experience, pitch adjustment and just-noticeable-difference scores). Moreover, the stimulus type used to elicit the FFR (tones or speech) impacts predictive performance in a manner that is consistent with prior research. Additionally, the FFR predicts labelling performance for piano tones better than unfamiliar sine tones. Taken together, the FFR reliably distinguishes individuals based on their explicit pitch labeling abilities, which highlights the complex dynamics between sensory processing and cognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8275664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82756642021-07-13 Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability Reis, Katherine S. Heald, Shannon L. M. Veillette, John P. Van Hedger, Stephen C. Nusbaum, Howard C. Sci Rep Article The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early sensory encoding have measurable effects on human performance. Absolute pitch (AP), the rare ability to label musical notes without reference notes, provides an excellent model system for testing how early neural encoding supports specialized auditory skills. Results show that the FFR predicts pitch labelling performance better than traditional measures related to AP (age of music onset, tonal language experience, pitch adjustment and just-noticeable-difference scores). Moreover, the stimulus type used to elicit the FFR (tones or speech) impacts predictive performance in a manner that is consistent with prior research. Additionally, the FFR predicts labelling performance for piano tones better than unfamiliar sine tones. Taken together, the FFR reliably distinguishes individuals based on their explicit pitch labeling abilities, which highlights the complex dynamics between sensory processing and cognition. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8275664/ /pubmed/34253760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Reis, Katherine S. Heald, Shannon L. M. Veillette, John P. Van Hedger, Stephen C. Nusbaum, Howard C. Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title | Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_full | Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_fullStr | Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_short | Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_sort | individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reiskatherines individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability AT healdshannonlm individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability AT veillettejohnp individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability AT vanhedgerstephenc individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability AT nusbaumhowardc individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability |