Cargando…
Surgical Management of Failed Revascularization in Moyamoya Vasculopathy
Objectives: Moyamoya vasculopathy (MMV) is a rare stenoocclusive cerebrovascular disease associated with increased risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, which can be treated using surgical revascularization techniques. Despite well-established neurosurgical procedures performed in experienced cen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.652967 |
_version_ | 1783721792988250112 |
---|---|
author | Lucia, Kristin Acker, Güliz Schlinkmann, Nicolas Georgiev, Stefan Vajkoczy, Peter |
author_facet | Lucia, Kristin Acker, Güliz Schlinkmann, Nicolas Georgiev, Stefan Vajkoczy, Peter |
author_sort | Lucia, Kristin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: Moyamoya vasculopathy (MMV) is a rare stenoocclusive cerebrovascular disease associated with increased risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, which can be treated using surgical revascularization techniques. Despite well-established neurosurgical procedures performed in experienced centers, bypass failure associated with neurological symptoms can occur. The current study therefore aims at characterizing the cases of bypass failure and repeat revascularization at a single center. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of all patients treated with revascularization surgery for MMV between January 2007 and December 2019 was performed. Angiographic data, cerebral blood flow analysis [H(2)O PET or single-photon emission CT (SPECT)], MRI, and clinical/operative data including follow-up assessments were reviewed. Results: We identified 308 MMV patients with 405 surgically treated hemispheres. Of the 405 hemispheres treated, 15 patients (3.7%) underwent repeat revascularization (median age 38, time to repeat revascularization in 60% of patients was within 1 year of first surgery). The most common cause of repeat revascularization was a symptomatic bypass occlusion (80%). New ischemic lesions were found in 13% of patients prior to repeat revascularization. Persistence of reduced or progressive worsening of cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVRC) compared with preoperative status was observed in 85% of repeat revascularization cases. Intermediate-flow bypass using a radial artery graft was most commonly used for repeat revascularization (60%) followed by re-superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (re-STA-MCA) bypass (26%). High-flow bypass using a saphenous vein graft and using an occipital artery to MCA bypass was each used once. Following repeat revascularization, no new ischemic events were recorded. Conclusion: Overall, repeat revascularization is needed only in a small percentage of the cases in MMV. A rescue surgery should be considered in those with neurological symptoms and decreased CVRC. Intermediate-flow bypass using a radial artery graft is a reliable technique for patients requiring repeat revascularization. Based on our institutional experience, we propose an algorithm for guiding the decision process in cases of bypass failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8275848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82758482021-07-14 Surgical Management of Failed Revascularization in Moyamoya Vasculopathy Lucia, Kristin Acker, Güliz Schlinkmann, Nicolas Georgiev, Stefan Vajkoczy, Peter Front Neurol Neurology Objectives: Moyamoya vasculopathy (MMV) is a rare stenoocclusive cerebrovascular disease associated with increased risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, which can be treated using surgical revascularization techniques. Despite well-established neurosurgical procedures performed in experienced centers, bypass failure associated with neurological symptoms can occur. The current study therefore aims at characterizing the cases of bypass failure and repeat revascularization at a single center. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of all patients treated with revascularization surgery for MMV between January 2007 and December 2019 was performed. Angiographic data, cerebral blood flow analysis [H(2)O PET or single-photon emission CT (SPECT)], MRI, and clinical/operative data including follow-up assessments were reviewed. Results: We identified 308 MMV patients with 405 surgically treated hemispheres. Of the 405 hemispheres treated, 15 patients (3.7%) underwent repeat revascularization (median age 38, time to repeat revascularization in 60% of patients was within 1 year of first surgery). The most common cause of repeat revascularization was a symptomatic bypass occlusion (80%). New ischemic lesions were found in 13% of patients prior to repeat revascularization. Persistence of reduced or progressive worsening of cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVRC) compared with preoperative status was observed in 85% of repeat revascularization cases. Intermediate-flow bypass using a radial artery graft was most commonly used for repeat revascularization (60%) followed by re-superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (re-STA-MCA) bypass (26%). High-flow bypass using a saphenous vein graft and using an occipital artery to MCA bypass was each used once. Following repeat revascularization, no new ischemic events were recorded. Conclusion: Overall, repeat revascularization is needed only in a small percentage of the cases in MMV. A rescue surgery should be considered in those with neurological symptoms and decreased CVRC. Intermediate-flow bypass using a radial artery graft is a reliable technique for patients requiring repeat revascularization. Based on our institutional experience, we propose an algorithm for guiding the decision process in cases of bypass failure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8275848/ /pubmed/34267719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.652967 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lucia, Acker, Schlinkmann, Georgiev and Vajkoczy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Lucia, Kristin Acker, Güliz Schlinkmann, Nicolas Georgiev, Stefan Vajkoczy, Peter Surgical Management of Failed Revascularization in Moyamoya Vasculopathy |
title | Surgical Management of Failed Revascularization in Moyamoya Vasculopathy |
title_full | Surgical Management of Failed Revascularization in Moyamoya Vasculopathy |
title_fullStr | Surgical Management of Failed Revascularization in Moyamoya Vasculopathy |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Management of Failed Revascularization in Moyamoya Vasculopathy |
title_short | Surgical Management of Failed Revascularization in Moyamoya Vasculopathy |
title_sort | surgical management of failed revascularization in moyamoya vasculopathy |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8275848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.652967 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luciakristin surgicalmanagementoffailedrevascularizationinmoyamoyavasculopathy AT ackerguliz surgicalmanagementoffailedrevascularizationinmoyamoyavasculopathy AT schlinkmannnicolas surgicalmanagementoffailedrevascularizationinmoyamoyavasculopathy AT georgievstefan surgicalmanagementoffailedrevascularizationinmoyamoyavasculopathy AT vajkoczypeter surgicalmanagementoffailedrevascularizationinmoyamoyavasculopathy |