Cargando…

Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?

BACKGROUND: The vaginal microbiota play a key role in defense against reproductive tract infections; however, many population-based women’s health studies do not collect vaginal samples. Molecular examinations of urine samples have revealed common vaginal bacteria. We sought to assess the extent tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Sarah E., Robinson, Courtney K., Shardell, Michelle D., Holm, Johanna B., Ravel, Jacques, Ghanem, Khalil G., Brotman, Rebecca M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.671413
_version_ 1783721840965844992
author Brown, Sarah E.
Robinson, Courtney K.
Shardell, Michelle D.
Holm, Johanna B.
Ravel, Jacques
Ghanem, Khalil G.
Brotman, Rebecca M.
author_facet Brown, Sarah E.
Robinson, Courtney K.
Shardell, Michelle D.
Holm, Johanna B.
Ravel, Jacques
Ghanem, Khalil G.
Brotman, Rebecca M.
author_sort Brown, Sarah E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The vaginal microbiota play a key role in defense against reproductive tract infections; however, many population-based women’s health studies do not collect vaginal samples. Molecular examinations of urine samples have revealed common vaginal bacteria. We sought to assess the extent that community state type assignments of archived random-catch and clean-catch urine samples agreed with the paired vaginal samples in both reproductive-age and peri/post-menopausal women. RESULTS: Using archived samples, we evaluated the microbiota concordance among women in three studies: two with paired mid-vaginal/random-catch urine (N=91 reproductive-age participants and N=13 peri/post-menopausal participants), and one with paired mid-vaginal/clean-catch urine (N=99 reproductive-age participants). Microbiota composition was characterized by sequencing amplicons of the 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 regions and assigned to community state types. Similarity of paired samples was gauged using agreement of community state types and Yue-Clayton θ indices. Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes II indicated which taxa were differently relatively abundant in paired vaginal and urine samples. In reproductive-age women, random-catch and clean-catch urines were 89.0% and 86.9% concordant on five community state types with paired mid-vaginal swabs, and Kappa statistics indicated almost perfect agreement (κ(random-catch)=.85, κ(clean-catch)=.81, p<0.0001). A small number of pairs of samples were discordant (23/190, 12%), and discordant pairs tended to be between samples classified to L. iners-dominated and/or low-Lactobacillus states. Concordance and agreement remained similar when dichotomizing the microbiota to Lactobacillus-dominated versus low-Lactobacillus microbiota, as well as when evaluating separately the three subtypes of the low-Lactobacillus community state type IV. Median similarity of paired urine/vaginal samples was high (θ(random-catch)=.85, θ(clean-catch)=.88), and a comparison of the random-catch and clean-catch similarity scores showed no significant difference (p=.80). Concordance and similarity were lower for peri/post-menopausal women, but agreement remained substantial (76.9% concordant, κ(random-catch)= 0.64, θ(random-catch)=.62). Taxonomic-level analysis confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Random-catch and clean-catch urine samples showed substantial agreement on bacterial composition to paired mid-vaginal samples, indicating that the genitourinary microbiota may be a reliable proxy for assessing the overall composition of the vaginal microbiota via community state types. This data suggests that urine samples can, with proper interpretation, be utilized as a surrogate for developing preliminary data and hypothesis-generating studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8276069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82760692021-07-14 Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples? Brown, Sarah E. Robinson, Courtney K. Shardell, Michelle D. Holm, Johanna B. Ravel, Jacques Ghanem, Khalil G. Brotman, Rebecca M. Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology BACKGROUND: The vaginal microbiota play a key role in defense against reproductive tract infections; however, many population-based women’s health studies do not collect vaginal samples. Molecular examinations of urine samples have revealed common vaginal bacteria. We sought to assess the extent that community state type assignments of archived random-catch and clean-catch urine samples agreed with the paired vaginal samples in both reproductive-age and peri/post-menopausal women. RESULTS: Using archived samples, we evaluated the microbiota concordance among women in three studies: two with paired mid-vaginal/random-catch urine (N=91 reproductive-age participants and N=13 peri/post-menopausal participants), and one with paired mid-vaginal/clean-catch urine (N=99 reproductive-age participants). Microbiota composition was characterized by sequencing amplicons of the 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 regions and assigned to community state types. Similarity of paired samples was gauged using agreement of community state types and Yue-Clayton θ indices. Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes II indicated which taxa were differently relatively abundant in paired vaginal and urine samples. In reproductive-age women, random-catch and clean-catch urines were 89.0% and 86.9% concordant on five community state types with paired mid-vaginal swabs, and Kappa statistics indicated almost perfect agreement (κ(random-catch)=.85, κ(clean-catch)=.81, p<0.0001). A small number of pairs of samples were discordant (23/190, 12%), and discordant pairs tended to be between samples classified to L. iners-dominated and/or low-Lactobacillus states. Concordance and agreement remained similar when dichotomizing the microbiota to Lactobacillus-dominated versus low-Lactobacillus microbiota, as well as when evaluating separately the three subtypes of the low-Lactobacillus community state type IV. Median similarity of paired urine/vaginal samples was high (θ(random-catch)=.85, θ(clean-catch)=.88), and a comparison of the random-catch and clean-catch similarity scores showed no significant difference (p=.80). Concordance and similarity were lower for peri/post-menopausal women, but agreement remained substantial (76.9% concordant, κ(random-catch)= 0.64, θ(random-catch)=.62). Taxonomic-level analysis confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Random-catch and clean-catch urine samples showed substantial agreement on bacterial composition to paired mid-vaginal samples, indicating that the genitourinary microbiota may be a reliable proxy for assessing the overall composition of the vaginal microbiota via community state types. This data suggests that urine samples can, with proper interpretation, be utilized as a surrogate for developing preliminary data and hypothesis-generating studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8276069/ /pubmed/34268137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.671413 Text en Copyright © 2021 Brown, Robinson, Shardell, Holm, Ravel, Ghanem and Brotman https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Brown, Sarah E.
Robinson, Courtney K.
Shardell, Michelle D.
Holm, Johanna B.
Ravel, Jacques
Ghanem, Khalil G.
Brotman, Rebecca M.
Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?
title Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?
title_full Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?
title_fullStr Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?
title_short Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?
title_sort assessing the concordance between urogenital and vaginal microbiota: can urine specimens be used as a proxy for vaginal samples?
topic Cellular and Infection Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.671413
work_keys_str_mv AT brownsarahe assessingtheconcordancebetweenurogenitalandvaginalmicrobiotacanurinespecimensbeusedasaproxyforvaginalsamples
AT robinsoncourtneyk assessingtheconcordancebetweenurogenitalandvaginalmicrobiotacanurinespecimensbeusedasaproxyforvaginalsamples
AT shardellmichelled assessingtheconcordancebetweenurogenitalandvaginalmicrobiotacanurinespecimensbeusedasaproxyforvaginalsamples
AT holmjohannab assessingtheconcordancebetweenurogenitalandvaginalmicrobiotacanurinespecimensbeusedasaproxyforvaginalsamples
AT raveljacques assessingtheconcordancebetweenurogenitalandvaginalmicrobiotacanurinespecimensbeusedasaproxyforvaginalsamples
AT ghanemkhalilg assessingtheconcordancebetweenurogenitalandvaginalmicrobiotacanurinespecimensbeusedasaproxyforvaginalsamples
AT brotmanrebeccam assessingtheconcordancebetweenurogenitalandvaginalmicrobiotacanurinespecimensbeusedasaproxyforvaginalsamples