Cargando…

General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis

OBJECTIVES: Reminders in primary care administrative systems aim to help clinicians provide evidence-based care, prescribe safely and save money. However, increased use of reminders can lead to alert fatigue. Our study aimed to assess general practitioners’ (GPs) and nurse practitioners’ (NPs) views...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cecil, Elizabeth, Dewa, Lindsay Helen, Ma, Richard, Majeed, Azeem, Aylin, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045050
_version_ 1783721876235747328
author Cecil, Elizabeth
Dewa, Lindsay Helen
Ma, Richard
Majeed, Azeem
Aylin, Paul
author_facet Cecil, Elizabeth
Dewa, Lindsay Helen
Ma, Richard
Majeed, Azeem
Aylin, Paul
author_sort Cecil, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Reminders in primary care administrative systems aim to help clinicians provide evidence-based care, prescribe safely and save money. However, increased use of reminders can lead to alert fatigue. Our study aimed to assess general practitioners’ (GPs) and nurse practitioners’ (NPs) views on electronic reminders in primary care. DESIGN: A qualitative analysis using semistructured interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen GPs and NP based in general practices located in North-West London and Yorkshire, England. METHODS: We collected data on participants’ views on: (1) perceptions of the value of information provided; (2) reminder-related behaviours and (3) how to improve reminders. We carried out a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants were familiar with reminders in their clinical systems and felt many were important to support their clinical work. However, participants reported, on average, 70% of reminders were ignored. Four major themes emerged: (1) reaction to a reminder, which was mixed and varied by situation. (2) Factors influencing the decision to act on reminders, often related to experience, consultation styles and interests of participants. Time constraints, alert design, inappropriate presentation and litigation were also factors. (3) Negative consequences of using reminders were increased workload or costs and compromising GP and NPs behaviour. (4) Factors relating to improving users’ engagement with reminders were prevention of unnecessary reminders through data linkage across healthcare administrative systems or the development of more intelligent algorithms. Participants felt training was vital to effectively manage reminders. CONCLUSIONS: GPs and NPs believe reminders are useful in supporting the provision of good quality patient care. Improving GPs and NPs’ engagement with reminders centres on further developing their relevance to their clinical practice, which is personalised, considers cognitive workflow and suppresses inappropriate presentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8276294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82762942021-07-27 General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis Cecil, Elizabeth Dewa, Lindsay Helen Ma, Richard Majeed, Azeem Aylin, Paul BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: Reminders in primary care administrative systems aim to help clinicians provide evidence-based care, prescribe safely and save money. However, increased use of reminders can lead to alert fatigue. Our study aimed to assess general practitioners’ (GPs) and nurse practitioners’ (NPs) views on electronic reminders in primary care. DESIGN: A qualitative analysis using semistructured interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen GPs and NP based in general practices located in North-West London and Yorkshire, England. METHODS: We collected data on participants’ views on: (1) perceptions of the value of information provided; (2) reminder-related behaviours and (3) how to improve reminders. We carried out a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants were familiar with reminders in their clinical systems and felt many were important to support their clinical work. However, participants reported, on average, 70% of reminders were ignored. Four major themes emerged: (1) reaction to a reminder, which was mixed and varied by situation. (2) Factors influencing the decision to act on reminders, often related to experience, consultation styles and interests of participants. Time constraints, alert design, inappropriate presentation and litigation were also factors. (3) Negative consequences of using reminders were increased workload or costs and compromising GP and NPs behaviour. (4) Factors relating to improving users’ engagement with reminders were prevention of unnecessary reminders through data linkage across healthcare administrative systems or the development of more intelligent algorithms. Participants felt training was vital to effectively manage reminders. CONCLUSIONS: GPs and NPs believe reminders are useful in supporting the provision of good quality patient care. Improving GPs and NPs’ engagement with reminders centres on further developing their relevance to their clinical practice, which is personalised, considers cognitive workflow and suppresses inappropriate presentation. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8276294/ /pubmed/34253661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045050 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Cecil, Elizabeth
Dewa, Lindsay Helen
Ma, Richard
Majeed, Azeem
Aylin, Paul
General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis
title General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis
title_full General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis
title_fullStr General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis
title_full_unstemmed General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis
title_short General practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis
title_sort general practitioner and nurse practitioner attitudes towards electronic reminders in primary care: a qualitative analysis
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045050
work_keys_str_mv AT cecilelizabeth generalpractitionerandnursepractitionerattitudestowardselectronicremindersinprimarycareaqualitativeanalysis
AT dewalindsayhelen generalpractitionerandnursepractitionerattitudestowardselectronicremindersinprimarycareaqualitativeanalysis
AT marichard generalpractitionerandnursepractitionerattitudestowardselectronicremindersinprimarycareaqualitativeanalysis
AT majeedazeem generalpractitionerandnursepractitionerattitudestowardselectronicremindersinprimarycareaqualitativeanalysis
AT aylinpaul generalpractitionerandnursepractitionerattitudestowardselectronicremindersinprimarycareaqualitativeanalysis