Cargando…
Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3 |
_version_ | 1783721896078999552 |
---|---|
author | Weprin, Samuel Crocerossa, Fabio Meyer, Dielle Maddra, Kaitlyn Valancy, David Osardu, Reginald Kang, Hae Sung Moore, Robert H. Carbonara, Umberto J. Kim, Fernando Autorino, Riccardo |
author_facet | Weprin, Samuel Crocerossa, Fabio Meyer, Dielle Maddra, Kaitlyn Valancy, David Osardu, Reginald Kang, Hae Sung Moore, Robert H. Carbonara, Umberto J. Kim, Fernando Autorino, Riccardo |
author_sort | Weprin, Samuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management. METHODS: Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical “sharps,” a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of “sharps”. Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview. RESULTS: Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery. CONCLUSION: The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8276389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82763892021-07-13 Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review Weprin, Samuel Crocerossa, Fabio Meyer, Dielle Maddra, Kaitlyn Valancy, David Osardu, Reginald Kang, Hae Sung Moore, Robert H. Carbonara, Umberto J. Kim, Fernando Autorino, Riccardo Patient Saf Surg Review BACKGROUND: A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management. METHODS: Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical “sharps,” a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of “sharps”. Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview. RESULTS: Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery. CONCLUSION: The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events. BioMed Central 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8276389/ /pubmed/34253246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Weprin, Samuel Crocerossa, Fabio Meyer, Dielle Maddra, Kaitlyn Valancy, David Osardu, Reginald Kang, Hae Sung Moore, Robert H. Carbonara, Umberto J. Kim, Fernando Autorino, Riccardo Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review |
title | Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review |
title_full | Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review |
title_short | Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review |
title_sort | risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weprinsamuel riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT crocerossafabio riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT meyerdielle riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT maddrakaitlyn riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT valancydavid riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT osardureginald riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT kanghaesung riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT mooreroberth riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT carbonaraumberto riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT jkimfernando riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview AT autorinoriccardo riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview |