Cargando…

Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weprin, Samuel, Crocerossa, Fabio, Meyer, Dielle, Maddra, Kaitlyn, Valancy, David, Osardu, Reginald, Kang, Hae Sung, Moore, Robert H., Carbonara, Umberto, J. Kim, Fernando, Autorino, Riccardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3
_version_ 1783721896078999552
author Weprin, Samuel
Crocerossa, Fabio
Meyer, Dielle
Maddra, Kaitlyn
Valancy, David
Osardu, Reginald
Kang, Hae Sung
Moore, Robert H.
Carbonara, Umberto
J. Kim, Fernando
Autorino, Riccardo
author_facet Weprin, Samuel
Crocerossa, Fabio
Meyer, Dielle
Maddra, Kaitlyn
Valancy, David
Osardu, Reginald
Kang, Hae Sung
Moore, Robert H.
Carbonara, Umberto
J. Kim, Fernando
Autorino, Riccardo
author_sort Weprin, Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management. METHODS: Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical “sharps,” a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of “sharps”. Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview. RESULTS: Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery. CONCLUSION: The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8276389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82763892021-07-13 Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review Weprin, Samuel Crocerossa, Fabio Meyer, Dielle Maddra, Kaitlyn Valancy, David Osardu, Reginald Kang, Hae Sung Moore, Robert H. Carbonara, Umberto J. Kim, Fernando Autorino, Riccardo Patient Saf Surg Review BACKGROUND: A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management. METHODS: Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical “sharps,” a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of “sharps”. Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview. RESULTS: Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery. CONCLUSION: The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events. BioMed Central 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8276389/ /pubmed/34253246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Weprin, Samuel
Crocerossa, Fabio
Meyer, Dielle
Maddra, Kaitlyn
Valancy, David
Osardu, Reginald
Kang, Hae Sung
Moore, Robert H.
Carbonara, Umberto
J. Kim, Fernando
Autorino, Riccardo
Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review
title Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review
title_full Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review
title_fullStr Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review
title_short Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review
title_sort risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3
work_keys_str_mv AT weprinsamuel riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT crocerossafabio riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT meyerdielle riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT maddrakaitlyn riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT valancydavid riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT osardureginald riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT kanghaesung riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT mooreroberth riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT carbonaraumberto riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT jkimfernando riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview
AT autorinoriccardo riskfactorsandpreventivestrategiesforunintentionallyretainedsurgicalsharpsasystematicreview