Cargando…

Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is common and usually requires surgical intervention. Intestinal plication is a traditional but critical strategy for SBO in certain scenarios. This study is to compare the short-term and long-term outcome between internal and external plications in the mana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Song, Hu, Qiongyuan, Shao, Lihua, Lu, Xiaofeng, Shen, Xiaofei, Ai, Shichao, Zeng, Ping, Wang, Meng, Guan, Wenxian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01304-1
_version_ 1783721897045786624
author Liu, Song
Hu, Qiongyuan
Shao, Lihua
Lu, Xiaofeng
Shen, Xiaofei
Ai, Shichao
Zeng, Ping
Wang, Meng
Guan, Wenxian
author_facet Liu, Song
Hu, Qiongyuan
Shao, Lihua
Lu, Xiaofeng
Shen, Xiaofei
Ai, Shichao
Zeng, Ping
Wang, Meng
Guan, Wenxian
author_sort Liu, Song
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is common and usually requires surgical intervention. Intestinal plication is a traditional but critical strategy for SBO in certain scenarios. This study is to compare the short-term and long-term outcome between internal and external plications in the management of SBO. METHODS: All patients receiving intestinal plication in our hospital were retrospectively collected. Short-term outcome including postoperative complications, reoperation, postoperative ICU stay, starting day of liquid diet and postoperative hospitalization, as well as long-term outcome including recurrence of obstruction, readmission, reoperation and death were compared between groups. Gut function at annual follow-up visits was evaluated as well. RESULTS: Nine internal and 11 external candidates were recruited into each group. The major causes of plication were adhesive obstruction, abdominal cocoon, volvulus and intussusception. Lower incidence of postoperative complication (p = 0.043) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.049) was observed in internal group. One patient receiving external plication died from anastomosis leakage. During the 5-year follow-up period, the readmission rate was low in both groups (22.2 % vs. 9.1 %), and none of patients required reoperation or deceased. None of patients exhibited gut dysfunction, and all patients restored normal gut function after 4 years. Patients in external group demonstrated accelerated recovery of gut function after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study compares short-term and long-term outcome of patients receiving internal or external intestinal plication. We suggest a conservative attitude toward external plication strategy. Surgical indication for intestinal plication is critical and awaits future investigations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-021-01304-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8276395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82763952021-07-13 Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction Liu, Song Hu, Qiongyuan Shao, Lihua Lu, Xiaofeng Shen, Xiaofei Ai, Shichao Zeng, Ping Wang, Meng Guan, Wenxian BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is common and usually requires surgical intervention. Intestinal plication is a traditional but critical strategy for SBO in certain scenarios. This study is to compare the short-term and long-term outcome between internal and external plications in the management of SBO. METHODS: All patients receiving intestinal plication in our hospital were retrospectively collected. Short-term outcome including postoperative complications, reoperation, postoperative ICU stay, starting day of liquid diet and postoperative hospitalization, as well as long-term outcome including recurrence of obstruction, readmission, reoperation and death were compared between groups. Gut function at annual follow-up visits was evaluated as well. RESULTS: Nine internal and 11 external candidates were recruited into each group. The major causes of plication were adhesive obstruction, abdominal cocoon, volvulus and intussusception. Lower incidence of postoperative complication (p = 0.043) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.049) was observed in internal group. One patient receiving external plication died from anastomosis leakage. During the 5-year follow-up period, the readmission rate was low in both groups (22.2 % vs. 9.1 %), and none of patients required reoperation or deceased. None of patients exhibited gut dysfunction, and all patients restored normal gut function after 4 years. Patients in external group demonstrated accelerated recovery of gut function after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study compares short-term and long-term outcome of patients receiving internal or external intestinal plication. We suggest a conservative attitude toward external plication strategy. Surgical indication for intestinal plication is critical and awaits future investigations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-021-01304-1. BioMed Central 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8276395/ /pubmed/34253214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01304-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Song
Hu, Qiongyuan
Shao, Lihua
Lu, Xiaofeng
Shen, Xiaofei
Ai, Shichao
Zeng, Ping
Wang, Meng
Guan, Wenxian
Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction
title Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction
title_full Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction
title_fullStr Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction
title_short Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction
title_sort comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01304-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liusong comparativeshorttermandlongtermoutcomesbetweeninternalandexternalintestinalplicationinthemanagementofsmallbowelobstruction
AT huqiongyuan comparativeshorttermandlongtermoutcomesbetweeninternalandexternalintestinalplicationinthemanagementofsmallbowelobstruction
AT shaolihua comparativeshorttermandlongtermoutcomesbetweeninternalandexternalintestinalplicationinthemanagementofsmallbowelobstruction
AT luxiaofeng comparativeshorttermandlongtermoutcomesbetweeninternalandexternalintestinalplicationinthemanagementofsmallbowelobstruction
AT shenxiaofei comparativeshorttermandlongtermoutcomesbetweeninternalandexternalintestinalplicationinthemanagementofsmallbowelobstruction
AT aishichao comparativeshorttermandlongtermoutcomesbetweeninternalandexternalintestinalplicationinthemanagementofsmallbowelobstruction
AT zengping comparativeshorttermandlongtermoutcomesbetweeninternalandexternalintestinalplicationinthemanagementofsmallbowelobstruction
AT wangmeng comparativeshorttermandlongtermoutcomesbetweeninternalandexternalintestinalplicationinthemanagementofsmallbowelobstruction
AT guanwenxian comparativeshorttermandlongtermoutcomesbetweeninternalandexternalintestinalplicationinthemanagementofsmallbowelobstruction