Cargando…

Development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology MRI protocoling tool with natural language processing

BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to MRI protocol assignment is essential for the efficient delivery of safe patient care. Advances in natural language processing (NLP) allow for the development of accurate automated protocol assignment. We aim to develop, evaluate, and deploy an NLP model that auto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chillakuru, Yeshwant Reddy, Munjal, Shourya, Laguna, Benjamin, Chen, Timothy L., Chaudhari, Gunvant R., Vu, Thienkhai, Seo, Youngho, Narvid, Jared, Sohn, Jae Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01574-y
_version_ 1783721912556322816
author Chillakuru, Yeshwant Reddy
Munjal, Shourya
Laguna, Benjamin
Chen, Timothy L.
Chaudhari, Gunvant R.
Vu, Thienkhai
Seo, Youngho
Narvid, Jared
Sohn, Jae Ho
author_facet Chillakuru, Yeshwant Reddy
Munjal, Shourya
Laguna, Benjamin
Chen, Timothy L.
Chaudhari, Gunvant R.
Vu, Thienkhai
Seo, Youngho
Narvid, Jared
Sohn, Jae Ho
author_sort Chillakuru, Yeshwant Reddy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to MRI protocol assignment is essential for the efficient delivery of safe patient care. Advances in natural language processing (NLP) allow for the development of accurate automated protocol assignment. We aim to develop, evaluate, and deploy an NLP model that automates protocol assignment, given the clinician indication text. METHODS: We collected 7139 spine MRI protocols (routine or contrast) and 990 head MRI protocols (routine brain, contrast brain, or other) from a single institution. Protocols were split into training (n = 4997 for spine MRI; n = 839 for head MRI), validation (n = 1071 for spine MRI, fivefold cross-validation used for head MRI), and test (n = 1071 for spine MRI; n = 151 for head MRI) sets. fastText and XGBoost were used to develop 2 NLP models to classify spine and head MRI protocols, respectively. A Flask-based web app was developed to be deployed via Heroku. RESULTS: The spine MRI model had an accuracy of 83.38% and a receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.8873. The head MRI model had an accuracy of 85.43% with a routine brain protocol ROC-AUC of 0.9463 and contrast brain protocol ROC-AUC of 0.9284. Cancer, infectious, and inflammatory related keywords were associated with contrast administration. Structural anatomic abnormalities and stroke/altered mental status were indicative of routine spine and brain MRI, respectively. Error analysis revealed increasing the sample size may improve performance for head MRI protocols. A web version of the model is provided for demonstration and deployment. CONCLUSION: We developed and web-deployed two NLP models that accurately predict spine and head MRI protocol assignment, which could improve radiology workflow efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8276477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82764772021-07-14 Development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology MRI protocoling tool with natural language processing Chillakuru, Yeshwant Reddy Munjal, Shourya Laguna, Benjamin Chen, Timothy L. Chaudhari, Gunvant R. Vu, Thienkhai Seo, Youngho Narvid, Jared Sohn, Jae Ho BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: A systematic approach to MRI protocol assignment is essential for the efficient delivery of safe patient care. Advances in natural language processing (NLP) allow for the development of accurate automated protocol assignment. We aim to develop, evaluate, and deploy an NLP model that automates protocol assignment, given the clinician indication text. METHODS: We collected 7139 spine MRI protocols (routine or contrast) and 990 head MRI protocols (routine brain, contrast brain, or other) from a single institution. Protocols were split into training (n = 4997 for spine MRI; n = 839 for head MRI), validation (n = 1071 for spine MRI, fivefold cross-validation used for head MRI), and test (n = 1071 for spine MRI; n = 151 for head MRI) sets. fastText and XGBoost were used to develop 2 NLP models to classify spine and head MRI protocols, respectively. A Flask-based web app was developed to be deployed via Heroku. RESULTS: The spine MRI model had an accuracy of 83.38% and a receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.8873. The head MRI model had an accuracy of 85.43% with a routine brain protocol ROC-AUC of 0.9463 and contrast brain protocol ROC-AUC of 0.9284. Cancer, infectious, and inflammatory related keywords were associated with contrast administration. Structural anatomic abnormalities and stroke/altered mental status were indicative of routine spine and brain MRI, respectively. Error analysis revealed increasing the sample size may improve performance for head MRI protocols. A web version of the model is provided for demonstration and deployment. CONCLUSION: We developed and web-deployed two NLP models that accurately predict spine and head MRI protocol assignment, which could improve radiology workflow efficiency. BioMed Central 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8276477/ /pubmed/34253196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01574-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chillakuru, Yeshwant Reddy
Munjal, Shourya
Laguna, Benjamin
Chen, Timothy L.
Chaudhari, Gunvant R.
Vu, Thienkhai
Seo, Youngho
Narvid, Jared
Sohn, Jae Ho
Development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology MRI protocoling tool with natural language processing
title Development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology MRI protocoling tool with natural language processing
title_full Development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology MRI protocoling tool with natural language processing
title_fullStr Development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology MRI protocoling tool with natural language processing
title_full_unstemmed Development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology MRI protocoling tool with natural language processing
title_short Development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology MRI protocoling tool with natural language processing
title_sort development and web deployment of an automated neuroradiology mri protocoling tool with natural language processing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34253196
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01574-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chillakuruyeshwantreddy developmentandwebdeploymentofanautomatedneuroradiologymriprotocolingtoolwithnaturallanguageprocessing
AT munjalshourya developmentandwebdeploymentofanautomatedneuroradiologymriprotocolingtoolwithnaturallanguageprocessing
AT lagunabenjamin developmentandwebdeploymentofanautomatedneuroradiologymriprotocolingtoolwithnaturallanguageprocessing
AT chentimothyl developmentandwebdeploymentofanautomatedneuroradiologymriprotocolingtoolwithnaturallanguageprocessing
AT chaudharigunvantr developmentandwebdeploymentofanautomatedneuroradiologymriprotocolingtoolwithnaturallanguageprocessing
AT vuthienkhai developmentandwebdeploymentofanautomatedneuroradiologymriprotocolingtoolwithnaturallanguageprocessing
AT seoyoungho developmentandwebdeploymentofanautomatedneuroradiologymriprotocolingtoolwithnaturallanguageprocessing
AT narvidjared developmentandwebdeploymentofanautomatedneuroradiologymriprotocolingtoolwithnaturallanguageprocessing
AT sohnjaeho developmentandwebdeploymentofanautomatedneuroradiologymriprotocolingtoolwithnaturallanguageprocessing