Cargando…

Screening for Cognitive Impairment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 2 Screening Instruments

INTRODUCTION: Community aged care services provide support to older adults living in their own homes. Cognitive impairment may increase the complexity of the support required. There is a need to ensure suitable brief screening tools are available to community aged care providers to assess possible c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hobden, Breanne, Bryant, Jamie, Freund, Megan, Clapham, Matthew, Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34247532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501327211029231
_version_ 1783721913513672704
author Hobden, Breanne
Bryant, Jamie
Freund, Megan
Clapham, Matthew
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
author_facet Hobden, Breanne
Bryant, Jamie
Freund, Megan
Clapham, Matthew
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
author_sort Hobden, Breanne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Community aged care services provide support to older adults living in their own homes. Cognitive impairment may increase the complexity of the support required. There is a need to ensure suitable brief screening tools are available to community aged care providers to assess possible cognitive impairment. This study aimed to examine the agreement between 2 validated cognitive impairment screening tools, the Mini-Cog, and Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), and the perceptions the individuals case manager of Case Manager’s. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was undertaken with clients of a community aged care provider. Clients were administered both the screening tools via an electronic survey by their Case Manager. RESULTS: In total, 158 (54%) eligible participants consented to participate. There was a 70% agreement between the Mini-Cog and AMTS measures, indicating a moderate agreement which was not statistically different from chance (Kappa 0.08, 95% CI −0.04-0.19). Case Managers identified 37% (n = 48/130) of participants as possibly having cognitive impairment, of which, 15% (n = 20) were also identified via a screening tool. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate poor agreement across the 3 measures. To ensure adequate supports are offered to those with cognitive impairment, the use of validated tools that can be administered by non-medical staff in a community setting is a priority. This study highlights a need for further work to determine the most suitable tool for use by community-based aged care services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8276483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82764832021-07-20 Screening for Cognitive Impairment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 2 Screening Instruments Hobden, Breanne Bryant, Jamie Freund, Megan Clapham, Matthew Sanson-Fisher, Rob J Prim Care Community Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Community aged care services provide support to older adults living in their own homes. Cognitive impairment may increase the complexity of the support required. There is a need to ensure suitable brief screening tools are available to community aged care providers to assess possible cognitive impairment. This study aimed to examine the agreement between 2 validated cognitive impairment screening tools, the Mini-Cog, and Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), and the perceptions the individuals case manager of Case Manager’s. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was undertaken with clients of a community aged care provider. Clients were administered both the screening tools via an electronic survey by their Case Manager. RESULTS: In total, 158 (54%) eligible participants consented to participate. There was a 70% agreement between the Mini-Cog and AMTS measures, indicating a moderate agreement which was not statistically different from chance (Kappa 0.08, 95% CI −0.04-0.19). Case Managers identified 37% (n = 48/130) of participants as possibly having cognitive impairment, of which, 15% (n = 20) were also identified via a screening tool. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate poor agreement across the 3 measures. To ensure adequate supports are offered to those with cognitive impairment, the use of validated tools that can be administered by non-medical staff in a community setting is a priority. This study highlights a need for further work to determine the most suitable tool for use by community-based aged care services. SAGE Publications 2021-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8276483/ /pubmed/34247532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501327211029231 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hobden, Breanne
Bryant, Jamie
Freund, Megan
Clapham, Matthew
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Screening for Cognitive Impairment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 2 Screening Instruments
title Screening for Cognitive Impairment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 2 Screening Instruments
title_full Screening for Cognitive Impairment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 2 Screening Instruments
title_fullStr Screening for Cognitive Impairment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 2 Screening Instruments
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Cognitive Impairment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 2 Screening Instruments
title_short Screening for Cognitive Impairment among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 2 Screening Instruments
title_sort screening for cognitive impairment among community-dwelling older adults: a comparison of 2 screening instruments
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8276483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34247532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501327211029231
work_keys_str_mv AT hobdenbreanne screeningforcognitiveimpairmentamongcommunitydwellingolderadultsacomparisonof2screeninginstruments
AT bryantjamie screeningforcognitiveimpairmentamongcommunitydwellingolderadultsacomparisonof2screeninginstruments
AT freundmegan screeningforcognitiveimpairmentamongcommunitydwellingolderadultsacomparisonof2screeninginstruments
AT claphammatthew screeningforcognitiveimpairmentamongcommunitydwellingolderadultsacomparisonof2screeninginstruments
AT sansonfisherrob screeningforcognitiveimpairmentamongcommunitydwellingolderadultsacomparisonof2screeninginstruments