Cargando…
The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive
BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard criterion for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJI), sonication of the removed implant may provide superior microbiological identification to synovial fluid and peri-implant tissue cultures. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the ro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252322 |
_version_ | 1783722006992125952 |
---|---|
author | Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha Honda, Emerson Kiyoshi Daniachi, Daniel Cury, Ricardo de Paula Leite da Silva, Cely Barreto Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui Salles, Mauro Jose |
author_facet | Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha Honda, Emerson Kiyoshi Daniachi, Daniel Cury, Ricardo de Paula Leite da Silva, Cely Barreto Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui Salles, Mauro Jose |
author_sort | Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard criterion for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJI), sonication of the removed implant may provide superior microbiological identification to synovial fluid and peri-implant tissue cultures. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the role of sonication culture compared to tissue cultures for diagnosing PJI, using different consensus and international guidelines for PJI definition. METHODS: Data of 146 patients undergoing removal of hip or knee arthroplasties between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM-2018), Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and a modified clinical criterion, were used to compare the performance of microbiological tests. McNemar´s test and proportion comparison were employed to calculate p-value. RESULTS: Overall, 56% (82/146) were diagnosed with PJI using the clinical criteria. Out of these cases, 57% (47/82) tested positive on tissue culture and 93% (76/82) on sonication culture. Applying this clinical criterion, the sensitivity of sonication fluid and tissue cultures was 92.7% (95% CI: 87.1%- 98.3%) and 57.3% (95% CI: 46.6%-68.0%) (p<0.001), respectively. When both methods were combined for diagnosis (sonication and tissue cultures) sensitivity reached 96.3% (95% CI: 91.5%-100%). Sonication culture and the combination of sonication with tissue cultures, showed higher sensitivity rates than tissue cultures alone for all diagnostic criteria (ICM-18, MSIS, IDSA and EBJIS) applied. Conversely, tissue culture provided greater specificity than sonication culture for all the criteria assessed, except for the EBJIS criteria, in which sonication and tissue cultures specificity was 100% and 95.3% (95% CI: 87.8–100%), respectively (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: In a context where diagnostic criteria available have shortcomings and tissue cultures remain the gold standard, sonication cultures can aid PJI diagnosis, especially when diagnostic criteria are inconclusive due to some important missing data (joint puncture, histology). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8277053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82770532021-07-20 The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha Honda, Emerson Kiyoshi Daniachi, Daniel Cury, Ricardo de Paula Leite da Silva, Cely Barreto Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui Salles, Mauro Jose PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard criterion for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJI), sonication of the removed implant may provide superior microbiological identification to synovial fluid and peri-implant tissue cultures. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the role of sonication culture compared to tissue cultures for diagnosing PJI, using different consensus and international guidelines for PJI definition. METHODS: Data of 146 patients undergoing removal of hip or knee arthroplasties between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM-2018), Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and a modified clinical criterion, were used to compare the performance of microbiological tests. McNemar´s test and proportion comparison were employed to calculate p-value. RESULTS: Overall, 56% (82/146) were diagnosed with PJI using the clinical criteria. Out of these cases, 57% (47/82) tested positive on tissue culture and 93% (76/82) on sonication culture. Applying this clinical criterion, the sensitivity of sonication fluid and tissue cultures was 92.7% (95% CI: 87.1%- 98.3%) and 57.3% (95% CI: 46.6%-68.0%) (p<0.001), respectively. When both methods were combined for diagnosis (sonication and tissue cultures) sensitivity reached 96.3% (95% CI: 91.5%-100%). Sonication culture and the combination of sonication with tissue cultures, showed higher sensitivity rates than tissue cultures alone for all diagnostic criteria (ICM-18, MSIS, IDSA and EBJIS) applied. Conversely, tissue culture provided greater specificity than sonication culture for all the criteria assessed, except for the EBJIS criteria, in which sonication and tissue cultures specificity was 100% and 95.3% (95% CI: 87.8–100%), respectively (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: In a context where diagnostic criteria available have shortcomings and tissue cultures remain the gold standard, sonication cultures can aid PJI diagnosis, especially when diagnostic criteria are inconclusive due to some important missing data (joint puncture, histology). Public Library of Science 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8277053/ /pubmed/34255768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252322 Text en © 2021 Ribeiro et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha Honda, Emerson Kiyoshi Daniachi, Daniel Cury, Ricardo de Paula Leite da Silva, Cely Barreto Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui Salles, Mauro Jose The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive |
title | The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive |
title_full | The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive |
title_fullStr | The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive |
title_short | The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive |
title_sort | impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ribeirotaianacunha theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT hondaemersonkiyoshi theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT daniachidaniel theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT curyricardodepaulaleite theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT dasilvacelybarreto theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT klautaugiselleburlamaqui theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT sallesmaurojose theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT ribeirotaianacunha impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT hondaemersonkiyoshi impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT daniachidaniel impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT curyricardodepaulaleite impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT dasilvacelybarreto impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT klautaugiselleburlamaqui impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive AT sallesmaurojose impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive |