Cargando…

The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive

BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard criterion for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJI), sonication of the removed implant may provide superior microbiological identification to synovial fluid and peri-implant tissue cultures. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the ro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha, Honda, Emerson Kiyoshi, Daniachi, Daniel, Cury, Ricardo de Paula Leite, da Silva, Cely Barreto, Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui, Salles, Mauro Jose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252322
_version_ 1783722006992125952
author Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha
Honda, Emerson Kiyoshi
Daniachi, Daniel
Cury, Ricardo de Paula Leite
da Silva, Cely Barreto
Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui
Salles, Mauro Jose
author_facet Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha
Honda, Emerson Kiyoshi
Daniachi, Daniel
Cury, Ricardo de Paula Leite
da Silva, Cely Barreto
Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui
Salles, Mauro Jose
author_sort Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard criterion for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJI), sonication of the removed implant may provide superior microbiological identification to synovial fluid and peri-implant tissue cultures. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the role of sonication culture compared to tissue cultures for diagnosing PJI, using different consensus and international guidelines for PJI definition. METHODS: Data of 146 patients undergoing removal of hip or knee arthroplasties between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM-2018), Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and a modified clinical criterion, were used to compare the performance of microbiological tests. McNemar´s test and proportion comparison were employed to calculate p-value. RESULTS: Overall, 56% (82/146) were diagnosed with PJI using the clinical criteria. Out of these cases, 57% (47/82) tested positive on tissue culture and 93% (76/82) on sonication culture. Applying this clinical criterion, the sensitivity of sonication fluid and tissue cultures was 92.7% (95% CI: 87.1%- 98.3%) and 57.3% (95% CI: 46.6%-68.0%) (p<0.001), respectively. When both methods were combined for diagnosis (sonication and tissue cultures) sensitivity reached 96.3% (95% CI: 91.5%-100%). Sonication culture and the combination of sonication with tissue cultures, showed higher sensitivity rates than tissue cultures alone for all diagnostic criteria (ICM-18, MSIS, IDSA and EBJIS) applied. Conversely, tissue culture provided greater specificity than sonication culture for all the criteria assessed, except for the EBJIS criteria, in which sonication and tissue cultures specificity was 100% and 95.3% (95% CI: 87.8–100%), respectively (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: In a context where diagnostic criteria available have shortcomings and tissue cultures remain the gold standard, sonication cultures can aid PJI diagnosis, especially when diagnostic criteria are inconclusive due to some important missing data (joint puncture, histology).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8277053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82770532021-07-20 The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha Honda, Emerson Kiyoshi Daniachi, Daniel Cury, Ricardo de Paula Leite da Silva, Cely Barreto Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui Salles, Mauro Jose PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard criterion for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJI), sonication of the removed implant may provide superior microbiological identification to synovial fluid and peri-implant tissue cultures. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the role of sonication culture compared to tissue cultures for diagnosing PJI, using different consensus and international guidelines for PJI definition. METHODS: Data of 146 patients undergoing removal of hip or knee arthroplasties between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM-2018), Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and a modified clinical criterion, were used to compare the performance of microbiological tests. McNemar´s test and proportion comparison were employed to calculate p-value. RESULTS: Overall, 56% (82/146) were diagnosed with PJI using the clinical criteria. Out of these cases, 57% (47/82) tested positive on tissue culture and 93% (76/82) on sonication culture. Applying this clinical criterion, the sensitivity of sonication fluid and tissue cultures was 92.7% (95% CI: 87.1%- 98.3%) and 57.3% (95% CI: 46.6%-68.0%) (p<0.001), respectively. When both methods were combined for diagnosis (sonication and tissue cultures) sensitivity reached 96.3% (95% CI: 91.5%-100%). Sonication culture and the combination of sonication with tissue cultures, showed higher sensitivity rates than tissue cultures alone for all diagnostic criteria (ICM-18, MSIS, IDSA and EBJIS) applied. Conversely, tissue culture provided greater specificity than sonication culture for all the criteria assessed, except for the EBJIS criteria, in which sonication and tissue cultures specificity was 100% and 95.3% (95% CI: 87.8–100%), respectively (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: In a context where diagnostic criteria available have shortcomings and tissue cultures remain the gold standard, sonication cultures can aid PJI diagnosis, especially when diagnostic criteria are inconclusive due to some important missing data (joint puncture, histology). Public Library of Science 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8277053/ /pubmed/34255768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252322 Text en © 2021 Ribeiro et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ribeiro, Taiana Cunha
Honda, Emerson Kiyoshi
Daniachi, Daniel
Cury, Ricardo de Paula Leite
da Silva, Cely Barreto
Klautau, Giselle Burlamaqui
Salles, Mauro Jose
The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive
title The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive
title_full The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive
title_fullStr The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive
title_full_unstemmed The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive
title_short The impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive
title_sort impact of sonication cultures when the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is inconclusive
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34255768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252322
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeirotaianacunha theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT hondaemersonkiyoshi theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT daniachidaniel theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT curyricardodepaulaleite theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT dasilvacelybarreto theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT klautaugiselleburlamaqui theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT sallesmaurojose theimpactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT ribeirotaianacunha impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT hondaemersonkiyoshi impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT daniachidaniel impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT curyricardodepaulaleite impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT dasilvacelybarreto impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT klautaugiselleburlamaqui impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive
AT sallesmaurojose impactofsonicationcultureswhenthediagnosisofprostheticjointinfectionisinconclusive