Cargando…
Integrated Prevention at Work: Protocol for a Concept Analysis
BACKGROUND: Integrated prevention at work promises to eliminate the boundaries between primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention actions taken by stakeholders in the world of work. It is receiving increasing attention from the scientific community because of its concerted and harmonized approach,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137727 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29869 |
_version_ | 1783722047067652096 |
---|---|
author | Lecours, Alexandra Major, Marie-Ève Vincent, Claude Lederer, Valérie Lamontagne, Marie-Ève |
author_facet | Lecours, Alexandra Major, Marie-Ève Vincent, Claude Lederer, Valérie Lamontagne, Marie-Ève |
author_sort | Lecours, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Integrated prevention at work promises to eliminate the boundaries between primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention actions taken by stakeholders in the world of work. It is receiving increasing attention from the scientific community because of its concerted and harmonized approach, which promotes employment access, return, and healthy long-term continuation. Although promising, integrated prevention is not yet well-defined, which makes it difficult to operationalize. OBJECTIVE: This manuscript exposes the protocol of a study aiming to conceptualize integrated prevention at work on the basis of scientific and experiential knowledge. METHODS: Using a concept analysis research design, data collection has been planned in 2 parts. A meta-narrative literature review will first be conducted to document how integrated prevention has been defined in the literature. Then, phone interviews will be conducted with key informers (ie, managers, workers, ergonomists, occupational therapists, psychologists, physiotherapists, union and insurance representatives) to document their viewpoints and understanding of integrated prevention at work. Qualitative data gathered during these 2 parts of research will be analyzed using template analysis, which allows data from literature and empirical collection to be analyzed simultaneously. The analysis will bring out the points of convergence, divergence, and complementarity between the information gleaned from literature and key informers’ experiences to arrive at a conceptualization of integrated prevention at work by identifying its uses, attributes, antecedents, and consequences. As a final step, validation and interpretation with a TRIAGE (Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts) group will be carried out in collaboration with the key informers to identify the tools for the implementation of integrated prevention at work and promote workers’ health and safety. RESULTS: This study is expected to offer a contemporary conceptualization of integrated prevention at work that clearly lays out the variables of this concept and elicits the viewpoints of the different stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: This study will contribute to the advancement of knowledge about the professional injury prevention continuum. The clear identification of the uses, attributes, antecedents, and consequences of integrated prevention at work will offer concrete tools to stakeholders to implement innovative and promising approaches to integrated prevention at work. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/29869 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8277315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82773152021-07-26 Integrated Prevention at Work: Protocol for a Concept Analysis Lecours, Alexandra Major, Marie-Ève Vincent, Claude Lederer, Valérie Lamontagne, Marie-Ève JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Integrated prevention at work promises to eliminate the boundaries between primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention actions taken by stakeholders in the world of work. It is receiving increasing attention from the scientific community because of its concerted and harmonized approach, which promotes employment access, return, and healthy long-term continuation. Although promising, integrated prevention is not yet well-defined, which makes it difficult to operationalize. OBJECTIVE: This manuscript exposes the protocol of a study aiming to conceptualize integrated prevention at work on the basis of scientific and experiential knowledge. METHODS: Using a concept analysis research design, data collection has been planned in 2 parts. A meta-narrative literature review will first be conducted to document how integrated prevention has been defined in the literature. Then, phone interviews will be conducted with key informers (ie, managers, workers, ergonomists, occupational therapists, psychologists, physiotherapists, union and insurance representatives) to document their viewpoints and understanding of integrated prevention at work. Qualitative data gathered during these 2 parts of research will be analyzed using template analysis, which allows data from literature and empirical collection to be analyzed simultaneously. The analysis will bring out the points of convergence, divergence, and complementarity between the information gleaned from literature and key informers’ experiences to arrive at a conceptualization of integrated prevention at work by identifying its uses, attributes, antecedents, and consequences. As a final step, validation and interpretation with a TRIAGE (Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts) group will be carried out in collaboration with the key informers to identify the tools for the implementation of integrated prevention at work and promote workers’ health and safety. RESULTS: This study is expected to offer a contemporary conceptualization of integrated prevention at work that clearly lays out the variables of this concept and elicits the viewpoints of the different stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: This study will contribute to the advancement of knowledge about the professional injury prevention continuum. The clear identification of the uses, attributes, antecedents, and consequences of integrated prevention at work will offer concrete tools to stakeholders to implement innovative and promising approaches to integrated prevention at work. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/29869 JMIR Publications 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8277315/ /pubmed/34137727 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29869 Text en ©Alexandra Lecours, Marie-Ève Major, Claude Vincent, Valérie Lederer, Marie-Ève Lamontagne. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 17.06.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Lecours, Alexandra Major, Marie-Ève Vincent, Claude Lederer, Valérie Lamontagne, Marie-Ève Integrated Prevention at Work: Protocol for a Concept Analysis |
title | Integrated Prevention at Work: Protocol for a Concept Analysis |
title_full | Integrated Prevention at Work: Protocol for a Concept Analysis |
title_fullStr | Integrated Prevention at Work: Protocol for a Concept Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrated Prevention at Work: Protocol for a Concept Analysis |
title_short | Integrated Prevention at Work: Protocol for a Concept Analysis |
title_sort | integrated prevention at work: protocol for a concept analysis |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137727 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lecoursalexandra integratedpreventionatworkprotocolforaconceptanalysis AT majormarieeve integratedpreventionatworkprotocolforaconceptanalysis AT vincentclaude integratedpreventionatworkprotocolforaconceptanalysis AT lederervalerie integratedpreventionatworkprotocolforaconceptanalysis AT lamontagnemarieeve integratedpreventionatworkprotocolforaconceptanalysis |