Cargando…
Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines
While roughly 30% of all women experience a spontaneous miscarriage in their lifetime, the incidence of recurrent (habitual) spontaneous miscarriage is 1 – 3% depending on the employed definition. The established risk factors include endocrine, anatomical, infection-related, genetic, haemostasis-rel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1380-3657 |
_version_ | 1783722075268055040 |
---|---|
author | Vomstein, Kilian Aulitzky, Anna Strobel, Laura Bohlmann, Michael Feil, Katharina Rudnik-Schöneborn, Sabine Zschocke, Johannes Toth, Bettina |
author_facet | Vomstein, Kilian Aulitzky, Anna Strobel, Laura Bohlmann, Michael Feil, Katharina Rudnik-Schöneborn, Sabine Zschocke, Johannes Toth, Bettina |
author_sort | Vomstein, Kilian |
collection | PubMed |
description | While roughly 30% of all women experience a spontaneous miscarriage in their lifetime, the incidence of recurrent (habitual) spontaneous miscarriage is 1 – 3% depending on the employed definition. The established risk factors include endocrine, anatomical, infection-related, genetic, haemostasis-related and immunological factors. Diagnosis is made more difficult by the sometimes diverging recommendations of the respective international specialist societies. The present study is therefore intended to provide a comparison of existing international guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines of the ESHRE, ASRM, the DGGG/OEGGG/SGGG and the recommendations of the RCOG were analysed. It was shown that investigation is indicated after 2 clinical pregnancies and the diagnosis should be made using a standardised timetable that includes the most frequent causes of spontaneous miscarriage. The guidelines concur that anatomical malformations, antiphospholipid syndrome and thyroid dysfunction should be excluded. Moreover, the guidelines recommend carrying out pre-conception chromosomal analysis of both partners (or of the aborted material). Other risk factors have not been included in the recommendations by all specialist societies, on the one hand because of a lack of diagnostic criteria (luteal phase insufficiency) and on the other hand because of the different age of the guidelines (chronic endometritis). In addition, various economic and consensus aspects in producing the guidelines influence the individual recommendations. An understanding of the underlying decision-making process should lead in practice to the best individual diagnosis and resulting treatment being offered to each couple. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8277441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82774412021-07-16 Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines Vomstein, Kilian Aulitzky, Anna Strobel, Laura Bohlmann, Michael Feil, Katharina Rudnik-Schöneborn, Sabine Zschocke, Johannes Toth, Bettina Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd While roughly 30% of all women experience a spontaneous miscarriage in their lifetime, the incidence of recurrent (habitual) spontaneous miscarriage is 1 – 3% depending on the employed definition. The established risk factors include endocrine, anatomical, infection-related, genetic, haemostasis-related and immunological factors. Diagnosis is made more difficult by the sometimes diverging recommendations of the respective international specialist societies. The present study is therefore intended to provide a comparison of existing international guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines of the ESHRE, ASRM, the DGGG/OEGGG/SGGG and the recommendations of the RCOG were analysed. It was shown that investigation is indicated after 2 clinical pregnancies and the diagnosis should be made using a standardised timetable that includes the most frequent causes of spontaneous miscarriage. The guidelines concur that anatomical malformations, antiphospholipid syndrome and thyroid dysfunction should be excluded. Moreover, the guidelines recommend carrying out pre-conception chromosomal analysis of both partners (or of the aborted material). Other risk factors have not been included in the recommendations by all specialist societies, on the one hand because of a lack of diagnostic criteria (luteal phase insufficiency) and on the other hand because of the different age of the guidelines (chronic endometritis). In addition, various economic and consensus aspects in producing the guidelines influence the individual recommendations. An understanding of the underlying decision-making process should lead in practice to the best individual diagnosis and resulting treatment being offered to each couple. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-07 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8277441/ /pubmed/34276063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1380-3657 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vomstein, Kilian Aulitzky, Anna Strobel, Laura Bohlmann, Michael Feil, Katharina Rudnik-Schöneborn, Sabine Zschocke, Johannes Toth, Bettina Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines |
title | Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines |
title_full | Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines |
title_fullStr | Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines |
title_short | Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines |
title_sort | recurrent spontaneous miscarriage: a comparison of international guidelines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1380-3657 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vomsteinkilian recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines AT aulitzkyanna recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines AT strobellaura recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines AT bohlmannmichael recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines AT feilkatharina recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines AT rudnikschonebornsabine recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines AT zschockejohannes recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines AT tothbettina recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines |