Cargando…

Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines

While roughly 30% of all women experience a spontaneous miscarriage in their lifetime, the incidence of recurrent (habitual) spontaneous miscarriage is 1 – 3% depending on the employed definition. The established risk factors include endocrine, anatomical, infection-related, genetic, haemostasis-rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vomstein, Kilian, Aulitzky, Anna, Strobel, Laura, Bohlmann, Michael, Feil, Katharina, Rudnik-Schöneborn, Sabine, Zschocke, Johannes, Toth, Bettina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1380-3657
_version_ 1783722075268055040
author Vomstein, Kilian
Aulitzky, Anna
Strobel, Laura
Bohlmann, Michael
Feil, Katharina
Rudnik-Schöneborn, Sabine
Zschocke, Johannes
Toth, Bettina
author_facet Vomstein, Kilian
Aulitzky, Anna
Strobel, Laura
Bohlmann, Michael
Feil, Katharina
Rudnik-Schöneborn, Sabine
Zschocke, Johannes
Toth, Bettina
author_sort Vomstein, Kilian
collection PubMed
description While roughly 30% of all women experience a spontaneous miscarriage in their lifetime, the incidence of recurrent (habitual) spontaneous miscarriage is 1 – 3% depending on the employed definition. The established risk factors include endocrine, anatomical, infection-related, genetic, haemostasis-related and immunological factors. Diagnosis is made more difficult by the sometimes diverging recommendations of the respective international specialist societies. The present study is therefore intended to provide a comparison of existing international guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines of the ESHRE, ASRM, the DGGG/OEGGG/SGGG and the recommendations of the RCOG were analysed. It was shown that investigation is indicated after 2 clinical pregnancies and the diagnosis should be made using a standardised timetable that includes the most frequent causes of spontaneous miscarriage. The guidelines concur that anatomical malformations, antiphospholipid syndrome and thyroid dysfunction should be excluded. Moreover, the guidelines recommend carrying out pre-conception chromosomal analysis of both partners (or of the aborted material). Other risk factors have not been included in the recommendations by all specialist societies, on the one hand because of a lack of diagnostic criteria (luteal phase insufficiency) and on the other hand because of the different age of the guidelines (chronic endometritis). In addition, various economic and consensus aspects in producing the guidelines influence the individual recommendations. An understanding of the underlying decision-making process should lead in practice to the best individual diagnosis and resulting treatment being offered to each couple.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8277441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82774412021-07-16 Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines Vomstein, Kilian Aulitzky, Anna Strobel, Laura Bohlmann, Michael Feil, Katharina Rudnik-Schöneborn, Sabine Zschocke, Johannes Toth, Bettina Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd While roughly 30% of all women experience a spontaneous miscarriage in their lifetime, the incidence of recurrent (habitual) spontaneous miscarriage is 1 – 3% depending on the employed definition. The established risk factors include endocrine, anatomical, infection-related, genetic, haemostasis-related and immunological factors. Diagnosis is made more difficult by the sometimes diverging recommendations of the respective international specialist societies. The present study is therefore intended to provide a comparison of existing international guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines of the ESHRE, ASRM, the DGGG/OEGGG/SGGG and the recommendations of the RCOG were analysed. It was shown that investigation is indicated after 2 clinical pregnancies and the diagnosis should be made using a standardised timetable that includes the most frequent causes of spontaneous miscarriage. The guidelines concur that anatomical malformations, antiphospholipid syndrome and thyroid dysfunction should be excluded. Moreover, the guidelines recommend carrying out pre-conception chromosomal analysis of both partners (or of the aborted material). Other risk factors have not been included in the recommendations by all specialist societies, on the one hand because of a lack of diagnostic criteria (luteal phase insufficiency) and on the other hand because of the different age of the guidelines (chronic endometritis). In addition, various economic and consensus aspects in producing the guidelines influence the individual recommendations. An understanding of the underlying decision-making process should lead in practice to the best individual diagnosis and resulting treatment being offered to each couple. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-07 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8277441/ /pubmed/34276063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1380-3657 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Vomstein, Kilian
Aulitzky, Anna
Strobel, Laura
Bohlmann, Michael
Feil, Katharina
Rudnik-Schöneborn, Sabine
Zschocke, Johannes
Toth, Bettina
Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines
title Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines
title_full Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines
title_fullStr Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines
title_short Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines
title_sort recurrent spontaneous miscarriage: a comparison of international guidelines
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34276063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1380-3657
work_keys_str_mv AT vomsteinkilian recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines
AT aulitzkyanna recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines
AT strobellaura recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines
AT bohlmannmichael recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines
AT feilkatharina recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines
AT rudnikschonebornsabine recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines
AT zschockejohannes recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines
AT tothbettina recurrentspontaneousmiscarriageacomparisonofinternationalguidelines