Cargando…
Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [(18)F]Flortaucipir and [(18)F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies
PURPOSE: The simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) is commonly applied for the quantification of brain positron emission tomography (PET) studies, particularly because it avoids arterial cannulation. SRTM requires a validated reference region which is obtained by baseline-blocking or displacement...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33443720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y |
_version_ | 1783722114872770560 |
---|---|
author | de Vries, Bart M. Timmers, Tessa Wolters, Emma E. Ossenkoppele, Rik Verfaillie, Sander C. J. Schuit, Robert C. Scheltens, Philip van der Flier, Wiesje M. Windhorst, Albert D. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Boellaard, Ronald Golla, Sandeep S. V. |
author_facet | de Vries, Bart M. Timmers, Tessa Wolters, Emma E. Ossenkoppele, Rik Verfaillie, Sander C. J. Schuit, Robert C. Scheltens, Philip van der Flier, Wiesje M. Windhorst, Albert D. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Boellaard, Ronald Golla, Sandeep S. V. |
author_sort | de Vries, Bart M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) is commonly applied for the quantification of brain positron emission tomography (PET) studies, particularly because it avoids arterial cannulation. SRTM requires a validated reference region which is obtained by baseline-blocking or displacement studies. Once a reference region is validated, the use should be verified for each new subject. This verification normally requires volume of distribution (V(T)) of a reference region. However, performing dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not always possible, specifically in elderly subjects and in advanced disease stages. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of non-invasive standardised uptake value (SUV) approaches, in comparison to V(T), as a verification of the previously validated grey matter cerebellum reference region for [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]florbetapir PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and controls. PROCEDURES: Dynamic 130-min [(18)F]flortaucipir PET scans obtained from nineteen subjects (10 AD patients) and 90-min [(18)F]florbetapir dynamic scans obtained from fourteen subjects (8 AD patients) were included. Regional V(T)’s were estimated for both tracers and were considered the standard verification of the previously validated reference region. Non-invasive SUVs corrected for body weight (SUV(BW)), lean body mass (SUL), and body surface area (SUV(BSA)) were obtained by using later time intervals of the dynamic scans. Simulations were also performed to assess the effect of flow and specific binding (BP(ND)) on the SUVs. RESULTS: A low SUV corresponded well with a low V(T) for both [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]florbetapir. Simulation confirmed that SUVs were only slightly affected by flow changes and that increases in SUV were predominantly determined by the presence of specific binding. CONCLUSIONS: In situations where dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not possible, a low SUV((80–100 min)) for [(18)F]flortaucipir and a low SUV((50–70 min)) for [(18)F]florbetapir may be used as indication for absence of specific binding in the grey matter cerebellum reference region. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8277631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82776312021-07-20 Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [(18)F]Flortaucipir and [(18)F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies de Vries, Bart M. Timmers, Tessa Wolters, Emma E. Ossenkoppele, Rik Verfaillie, Sander C. J. Schuit, Robert C. Scheltens, Philip van der Flier, Wiesje M. Windhorst, Albert D. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Boellaard, Ronald Golla, Sandeep S. V. Mol Imaging Biol Research Article PURPOSE: The simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) is commonly applied for the quantification of brain positron emission tomography (PET) studies, particularly because it avoids arterial cannulation. SRTM requires a validated reference region which is obtained by baseline-blocking or displacement studies. Once a reference region is validated, the use should be verified for each new subject. This verification normally requires volume of distribution (V(T)) of a reference region. However, performing dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not always possible, specifically in elderly subjects and in advanced disease stages. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of non-invasive standardised uptake value (SUV) approaches, in comparison to V(T), as a verification of the previously validated grey matter cerebellum reference region for [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]florbetapir PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and controls. PROCEDURES: Dynamic 130-min [(18)F]flortaucipir PET scans obtained from nineteen subjects (10 AD patients) and 90-min [(18)F]florbetapir dynamic scans obtained from fourteen subjects (8 AD patients) were included. Regional V(T)’s were estimated for both tracers and were considered the standard verification of the previously validated reference region. Non-invasive SUVs corrected for body weight (SUV(BW)), lean body mass (SUL), and body surface area (SUV(BSA)) were obtained by using later time intervals of the dynamic scans. Simulations were also performed to assess the effect of flow and specific binding (BP(ND)) on the SUVs. RESULTS: A low SUV corresponded well with a low V(T) for both [(18)F]flortaucipir and [(18)F]florbetapir. Simulation confirmed that SUVs were only slightly affected by flow changes and that increases in SUV were predominantly determined by the presence of specific binding. CONCLUSIONS: In situations where dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not possible, a low SUV((80–100 min)) for [(18)F]flortaucipir and a low SUV((50–70 min)) for [(18)F]florbetapir may be used as indication for absence of specific binding in the grey matter cerebellum reference region. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8277631/ /pubmed/33443720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Vries, Bart M. Timmers, Tessa Wolters, Emma E. Ossenkoppele, Rik Verfaillie, Sander C. J. Schuit, Robert C. Scheltens, Philip van der Flier, Wiesje M. Windhorst, Albert D. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Boellaard, Ronald Golla, Sandeep S. V. Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [(18)F]Flortaucipir and [(18)F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies |
title | Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [(18)F]Flortaucipir and [(18)F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies |
title_full | Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [(18)F]Flortaucipir and [(18)F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [(18)F]Flortaucipir and [(18)F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [(18)F]Flortaucipir and [(18)F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies |
title_short | Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [(18)F]Flortaucipir and [(18)F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies |
title_sort | non-invasive standardised uptake value for verification of the use of previously validated reference region for [(18)f]flortaucipir and [(18)f]florbetapir brain pet studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33443720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devriesbartm noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT timmerstessa noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT woltersemmae noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT ossenkoppelerik noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT verfailliesandercj noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT schuitrobertc noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT scheltensphilip noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT vanderflierwiesjem noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT windhorstalbertd noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT vanberckelbartnm noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT boellaardronald noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies AT gollasandeepsv noninvasivestandardiseduptakevalueforverificationoftheuseofpreviouslyvalidatedreferenceregionfor18fflortaucipirand18fflorbetapirbrainpetstudies |