Cargando…
Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats
Transurethral and suprapubic catheterization have both been used to test urethral function in rats; however, it is unknown whether these methods affect urethral function or if the order of catheterization affects the results. The aim of this cross-over designed experiment was to compare the effects...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93772-x |
_version_ | 1783722126856945664 |
---|---|
author | Janssen, Kristine Deng, Kangli Majerus, Steve J. A. Lin, Dan Li Hanzlicek, Brett Butler, Robert S. van der Vaart, Carl H. Damaser, Margot S. |
author_facet | Janssen, Kristine Deng, Kangli Majerus, Steve J. A. Lin, Dan Li Hanzlicek, Brett Butler, Robert S. van der Vaart, Carl H. Damaser, Margot S. |
author_sort | Janssen, Kristine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transurethral and suprapubic catheterization have both been used to test urethral function in rats; however, it is unknown whether these methods affect urethral function or if the order of catheterization affects the results. The aim of this cross-over designed experiment was to compare the effects of catheterization methods and order on leak point pressure (LPP) testing. LPP and simultaneous external urethral sphincter electromyography (EUS EMG) were recorded in anesthetized female virgin Sprague-Dawley rats in a cross-over design to test the effects of transurethral and suprapubic catheterization. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure during LPP testing whether measured with a transurethral or suprapubic catheter. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure between the first and second catheter insertions. However, peak EMG firing rate, as well as peak EMG amplitude and EMG amplitude difference between peak and baseline were significantly higher after the first catheter insertion compared to the second insertion, regardless of the catheter method. Our results suggest that route of catheterization does not alter urethral function, e.g. create a functional partial outlet obstruction. Either catheterization method could be used for LPP and/or EUS EMG testing in rats. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8277785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82777852021-07-15 Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats Janssen, Kristine Deng, Kangli Majerus, Steve J. A. Lin, Dan Li Hanzlicek, Brett Butler, Robert S. van der Vaart, Carl H. Damaser, Margot S. Sci Rep Article Transurethral and suprapubic catheterization have both been used to test urethral function in rats; however, it is unknown whether these methods affect urethral function or if the order of catheterization affects the results. The aim of this cross-over designed experiment was to compare the effects of catheterization methods and order on leak point pressure (LPP) testing. LPP and simultaneous external urethral sphincter electromyography (EUS EMG) were recorded in anesthetized female virgin Sprague-Dawley rats in a cross-over design to test the effects of transurethral and suprapubic catheterization. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure during LPP testing whether measured with a transurethral or suprapubic catheter. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure between the first and second catheter insertions. However, peak EMG firing rate, as well as peak EMG amplitude and EMG amplitude difference between peak and baseline were significantly higher after the first catheter insertion compared to the second insertion, regardless of the catheter method. Our results suggest that route of catheterization does not alter urethral function, e.g. create a functional partial outlet obstruction. Either catheterization method could be used for LPP and/or EUS EMG testing in rats. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8277785/ /pubmed/34257341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93772-x Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Janssen, Kristine Deng, Kangli Majerus, Steve J. A. Lin, Dan Li Hanzlicek, Brett Butler, Robert S. van der Vaart, Carl H. Damaser, Margot S. Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats |
title | Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats |
title_full | Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats |
title_fullStr | Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats |
title_short | Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats |
title_sort | transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93772-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janssenkristine transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats AT dengkangli transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats AT majerussteveja transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats AT lindanli transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats AT hanzlicekbrett transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats AT butlerroberts transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats AT vandervaartcarlh transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats AT damasermargots transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats |