Cargando…

Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats

Transurethral and suprapubic catheterization have both been used to test urethral function in rats; however, it is unknown whether these methods affect urethral function or if the order of catheterization affects the results. The aim of this cross-over designed experiment was to compare the effects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssen, Kristine, Deng, Kangli, Majerus, Steve J. A., Lin, Dan Li, Hanzlicek, Brett, Butler, Robert S., van der Vaart, Carl H., Damaser, Margot S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93772-x
_version_ 1783722126856945664
author Janssen, Kristine
Deng, Kangli
Majerus, Steve J. A.
Lin, Dan Li
Hanzlicek, Brett
Butler, Robert S.
van der Vaart, Carl H.
Damaser, Margot S.
author_facet Janssen, Kristine
Deng, Kangli
Majerus, Steve J. A.
Lin, Dan Li
Hanzlicek, Brett
Butler, Robert S.
van der Vaart, Carl H.
Damaser, Margot S.
author_sort Janssen, Kristine
collection PubMed
description Transurethral and suprapubic catheterization have both been used to test urethral function in rats; however, it is unknown whether these methods affect urethral function or if the order of catheterization affects the results. The aim of this cross-over designed experiment was to compare the effects of catheterization methods and order on leak point pressure (LPP) testing. LPP and simultaneous external urethral sphincter electromyography (EUS EMG) were recorded in anesthetized female virgin Sprague-Dawley rats in a cross-over design to test the effects of transurethral and suprapubic catheterization. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure during LPP testing whether measured with a transurethral or suprapubic catheter. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure between the first and second catheter insertions. However, peak EMG firing rate, as well as peak EMG amplitude and EMG amplitude difference between peak and baseline were significantly higher after the first catheter insertion compared to the second insertion, regardless of the catheter method. Our results suggest that route of catheterization does not alter urethral function, e.g. create a functional partial outlet obstruction. Either catheterization method could be used for LPP and/or EUS EMG testing in rats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8277785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82777852021-07-15 Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats Janssen, Kristine Deng, Kangli Majerus, Steve J. A. Lin, Dan Li Hanzlicek, Brett Butler, Robert S. van der Vaart, Carl H. Damaser, Margot S. Sci Rep Article Transurethral and suprapubic catheterization have both been used to test urethral function in rats; however, it is unknown whether these methods affect urethral function or if the order of catheterization affects the results. The aim of this cross-over designed experiment was to compare the effects of catheterization methods and order on leak point pressure (LPP) testing. LPP and simultaneous external urethral sphincter electromyography (EUS EMG) were recorded in anesthetized female virgin Sprague-Dawley rats in a cross-over design to test the effects of transurethral and suprapubic catheterization. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure during LPP testing whether measured with a transurethral or suprapubic catheter. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure between the first and second catheter insertions. However, peak EMG firing rate, as well as peak EMG amplitude and EMG amplitude difference between peak and baseline were significantly higher after the first catheter insertion compared to the second insertion, regardless of the catheter method. Our results suggest that route of catheterization does not alter urethral function, e.g. create a functional partial outlet obstruction. Either catheterization method could be used for LPP and/or EUS EMG testing in rats. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8277785/ /pubmed/34257341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93772-x Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Janssen, Kristine
Deng, Kangli
Majerus, Steve J. A.
Lin, Dan Li
Hanzlicek, Brett
Butler, Robert S.
van der Vaart, Carl H.
Damaser, Margot S.
Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats
title Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats
title_full Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats
title_fullStr Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats
title_full_unstemmed Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats
title_short Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats
title_sort transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93772-x
work_keys_str_mv AT janssenkristine transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats
AT dengkangli transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats
AT majerussteveja transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats
AT lindanli transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats
AT hanzlicekbrett transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats
AT butlerroberts transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats
AT vandervaartcarlh transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats
AT damasermargots transurethralversussuprapubiccatheterizationtotesturethralfunctioninrats