Cargando…

Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study

BACKGROUND: Understanding how to translate research discoveries into solutions for healthcare improvement is a priority of NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). This study, supported by one CTSA, aims to capture one process of shaping and implementing innovations to advance th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Proctor, Enola K., McKay, Virginia R., Toker, Emre, Maddox, Thomas M., Hooley, Cole, Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca, MacGibbon, Simon, Evanoff, Bradley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.778
_version_ 1783722208711933952
author Proctor, Enola K.
McKay, Virginia R.
Toker, Emre
Maddox, Thomas M.
Hooley, Cole
Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca
MacGibbon, Simon
Evanoff, Bradley
author_facet Proctor, Enola K.
McKay, Virginia R.
Toker, Emre
Maddox, Thomas M.
Hooley, Cole
Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca
MacGibbon, Simon
Evanoff, Bradley
author_sort Proctor, Enola K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding how to translate research discoveries into solutions for healthcare improvement is a priority of NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). This study, supported by one CTSA, aims to capture one process of shaping and implementing innovations to advance the timeliness and patient-centeredness of cardiovascular care. Specifically, we sought to understand a partnership between a private digital health startup company, a university innovation lab, and an academic health system’s cardiology program pursuing this goal. FINDINGS: The collaboration proceeded through clear phases to address the questions and challenges: problem definition, exploration and formalization of the partnership, innovation co-creation and pilot test, and scale-up planning. Phases were punctuated by key decisions, such as forming the partnership, negotiating terms of the partnership, iterating form and features of the innovation, and exploring sufficiency of its value-add for scale-up and sustainment. Key implementation concepts were apparent, including implementation strategies (e.g., champions and iterative trialing) and the implementation outcomes of acceptability, sustainment, and scale-up. Participants identified potential risks of collaboration, reflected on their co-creation process, and the value of engaging stakeholders in innovation design. Findings may inform subsequent collaborations between innovators and translational researchers. METHODS: We conducted a case study to understand the partnership; characterize the questions they pursued, their decision points, information and data sources; and identify the challenges and risks. Data were collected through a series of four focus groups with members of each partnering organization. A transdisciplinary research team iteratively worked to condense and synthesize data from audio recorded transcripts into a case narrative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8278157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82781572021-07-14 Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study Proctor, Enola K. McKay, Virginia R. Toker, Emre Maddox, Thomas M. Hooley, Cole Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca MacGibbon, Simon Evanoff, Bradley J Clin Transl Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding how to translate research discoveries into solutions for healthcare improvement is a priority of NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). This study, supported by one CTSA, aims to capture one process of shaping and implementing innovations to advance the timeliness and patient-centeredness of cardiovascular care. Specifically, we sought to understand a partnership between a private digital health startup company, a university innovation lab, and an academic health system’s cardiology program pursuing this goal. FINDINGS: The collaboration proceeded through clear phases to address the questions and challenges: problem definition, exploration and formalization of the partnership, innovation co-creation and pilot test, and scale-up planning. Phases were punctuated by key decisions, such as forming the partnership, negotiating terms of the partnership, iterating form and features of the innovation, and exploring sufficiency of its value-add for scale-up and sustainment. Key implementation concepts were apparent, including implementation strategies (e.g., champions and iterative trialing) and the implementation outcomes of acceptability, sustainment, and scale-up. Participants identified potential risks of collaboration, reflected on their co-creation process, and the value of engaging stakeholders in innovation design. Findings may inform subsequent collaborations between innovators and translational researchers. METHODS: We conducted a case study to understand the partnership; characterize the questions they pursued, their decision points, information and data sources; and identify the challenges and risks. Data were collected through a series of four focus groups with members of each partnering organization. A transdisciplinary research team iteratively worked to condense and synthesize data from audio recorded transcripts into a case narrative. Cambridge University Press 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8278157/ /pubmed/34267948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.778 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
spellingShingle Research Article
Proctor, Enola K.
McKay, Virginia R.
Toker, Emre
Maddox, Thomas M.
Hooley, Cole
Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca
MacGibbon, Simon
Evanoff, Bradley
Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study
title Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study
title_full Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study
title_fullStr Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study
title_full_unstemmed Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study
title_short Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study
title_sort partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: a case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.778
work_keys_str_mv AT proctorenolak partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy
AT mckayvirginiar partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy
AT tokeremre partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy
AT maddoxthomasm partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy
AT hooleycole partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy
AT lengnickhallrebecca partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy
AT macgibbonsimon partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy
AT evanoffbradley partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy