Cargando…
Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study
BACKGROUND: Understanding how to translate research discoveries into solutions for healthcare improvement is a priority of NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). This study, supported by one CTSA, aims to capture one process of shaping and implementing innovations to advance th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.778 |
_version_ | 1783722208711933952 |
---|---|
author | Proctor, Enola K. McKay, Virginia R. Toker, Emre Maddox, Thomas M. Hooley, Cole Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca MacGibbon, Simon Evanoff, Bradley |
author_facet | Proctor, Enola K. McKay, Virginia R. Toker, Emre Maddox, Thomas M. Hooley, Cole Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca MacGibbon, Simon Evanoff, Bradley |
author_sort | Proctor, Enola K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding how to translate research discoveries into solutions for healthcare improvement is a priority of NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). This study, supported by one CTSA, aims to capture one process of shaping and implementing innovations to advance the timeliness and patient-centeredness of cardiovascular care. Specifically, we sought to understand a partnership between a private digital health startup company, a university innovation lab, and an academic health system’s cardiology program pursuing this goal. FINDINGS: The collaboration proceeded through clear phases to address the questions and challenges: problem definition, exploration and formalization of the partnership, innovation co-creation and pilot test, and scale-up planning. Phases were punctuated by key decisions, such as forming the partnership, negotiating terms of the partnership, iterating form and features of the innovation, and exploring sufficiency of its value-add for scale-up and sustainment. Key implementation concepts were apparent, including implementation strategies (e.g., champions and iterative trialing) and the implementation outcomes of acceptability, sustainment, and scale-up. Participants identified potential risks of collaboration, reflected on their co-creation process, and the value of engaging stakeholders in innovation design. Findings may inform subsequent collaborations between innovators and translational researchers. METHODS: We conducted a case study to understand the partnership; characterize the questions they pursued, their decision points, information and data sources; and identify the challenges and risks. Data were collected through a series of four focus groups with members of each partnering organization. A transdisciplinary research team iteratively worked to condense and synthesize data from audio recorded transcripts into a case narrative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8278157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82781572021-07-14 Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study Proctor, Enola K. McKay, Virginia R. Toker, Emre Maddox, Thomas M. Hooley, Cole Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca MacGibbon, Simon Evanoff, Bradley J Clin Transl Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding how to translate research discoveries into solutions for healthcare improvement is a priority of NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). This study, supported by one CTSA, aims to capture one process of shaping and implementing innovations to advance the timeliness and patient-centeredness of cardiovascular care. Specifically, we sought to understand a partnership between a private digital health startup company, a university innovation lab, and an academic health system’s cardiology program pursuing this goal. FINDINGS: The collaboration proceeded through clear phases to address the questions and challenges: problem definition, exploration and formalization of the partnership, innovation co-creation and pilot test, and scale-up planning. Phases were punctuated by key decisions, such as forming the partnership, negotiating terms of the partnership, iterating form and features of the innovation, and exploring sufficiency of its value-add for scale-up and sustainment. Key implementation concepts were apparent, including implementation strategies (e.g., champions and iterative trialing) and the implementation outcomes of acceptability, sustainment, and scale-up. Participants identified potential risks of collaboration, reflected on their co-creation process, and the value of engaging stakeholders in innovation design. Findings may inform subsequent collaborations between innovators and translational researchers. METHODS: We conducted a case study to understand the partnership; characterize the questions they pursued, their decision points, information and data sources; and identify the challenges and risks. Data were collected through a series of four focus groups with members of each partnering organization. A transdisciplinary research team iteratively worked to condense and synthesize data from audio recorded transcripts into a case narrative. Cambridge University Press 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8278157/ /pubmed/34267948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.778 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Proctor, Enola K. McKay, Virginia R. Toker, Emre Maddox, Thomas M. Hooley, Cole Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca MacGibbon, Simon Evanoff, Bradley Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study |
title | Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study |
title_full | Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study |
title_fullStr | Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study |
title_short | Partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: A case study |
title_sort | partnered innovation to implement timely and personalized care: a case study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34267948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT proctorenolak partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy AT mckayvirginiar partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy AT tokeremre partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy AT maddoxthomasm partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy AT hooleycole partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy AT lengnickhallrebecca partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy AT macgibbonsimon partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy AT evanoffbradley partneredinnovationtoimplementtimelyandpersonalizedcareacasestudy |