Cargando…

Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol

Health and social care Standards are evidence-based statements that demonstrate a desired level of care. Setting Standards for health and social care is a mechanism by which quality improvements can be achieved. Limited evidence exists on appropriate implementation strategies to overcome challenges...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Yvonne, O’Rourke, Niamh, Flynn, Rachel, Hegarty, Josephine, O’Connor, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337321
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13212.2
_version_ 1783722228775387136
author Kelly, Yvonne
O’Rourke, Niamh
Flynn, Rachel
Hegarty, Josephine
O’Connor, Laura
author_facet Kelly, Yvonne
O’Rourke, Niamh
Flynn, Rachel
Hegarty, Josephine
O’Connor, Laura
author_sort Kelly, Yvonne
collection PubMed
description Health and social care Standards are evidence-based statements that demonstrate a desired level of care. Setting Standards for health and social care is a mechanism by which quality improvements can be achieved. Limited evidence exists on appropriate implementation strategies to overcome challenges with implementing Standards. The aim of this protocol is to set out a comprehensive plan to undertake a systematic search, appraisal and mixed research synthesis of the international literature that examines factors that hinder and facilitate implementation of health and social care Standards in order to inform the design of implementation strategies. A research question, “What are the enablers and barriers to implementing health and social care Standards in health and social care services?” was designed using the ‘SPICE’ (Setting, Perspectives, Interest phenomenon of, Comparison, Evaluation) framework. Electronic databases, grey literature and reference lists from included studies will be searched. Primary qualitative, quantitative descriptive and mixed methods studies reporting on enablers and barriers to implementing nationally endorsed Standards, will be included. The review will focus on experiences and perspectives from multi-level stakeholders including patient and public involvement. The quality of studies will be appraised using appropriate tools and findings used to weight interpretation of findings. Search outputs, data extraction and quality appraisal will be undertaken by two reviewers independently. Sandelowski meta-summary will be used to synthesise the data. Frequency and intensity effect sizes of enablers and barriers will be calculated to evaluate their prevalence across the studies. The Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) approach will be applied to assess confidence in the findings of the review. Findings from this examination will inform influencing factors to implementation. Subsequently, this will contribute to pairing Standards with appropriate implementation strategies that will optimise the enabling factors and overcome challenges to implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8278248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82782482021-07-29 Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol Kelly, Yvonne O’Rourke, Niamh Flynn, Rachel Hegarty, Josephine O’Connor, Laura HRB Open Res Study Protocol Health and social care Standards are evidence-based statements that demonstrate a desired level of care. Setting Standards for health and social care is a mechanism by which quality improvements can be achieved. Limited evidence exists on appropriate implementation strategies to overcome challenges with implementing Standards. The aim of this protocol is to set out a comprehensive plan to undertake a systematic search, appraisal and mixed research synthesis of the international literature that examines factors that hinder and facilitate implementation of health and social care Standards in order to inform the design of implementation strategies. A research question, “What are the enablers and barriers to implementing health and social care Standards in health and social care services?” was designed using the ‘SPICE’ (Setting, Perspectives, Interest phenomenon of, Comparison, Evaluation) framework. Electronic databases, grey literature and reference lists from included studies will be searched. Primary qualitative, quantitative descriptive and mixed methods studies reporting on enablers and barriers to implementing nationally endorsed Standards, will be included. The review will focus on experiences and perspectives from multi-level stakeholders including patient and public involvement. The quality of studies will be appraised using appropriate tools and findings used to weight interpretation of findings. Search outputs, data extraction and quality appraisal will be undertaken by two reviewers independently. Sandelowski meta-summary will be used to synthesise the data. Frequency and intensity effect sizes of enablers and barriers will be calculated to evaluate their prevalence across the studies. The Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) approach will be applied to assess confidence in the findings of the review. Findings from this examination will inform influencing factors to implementation. Subsequently, this will contribute to pairing Standards with appropriate implementation strategies that will optimise the enabling factors and overcome challenges to implementation. F1000 Research Limited 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8278248/ /pubmed/34337321 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13212.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Kelly Y et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kelly, Yvonne
O’Rourke, Niamh
Flynn, Rachel
Hegarty, Josephine
O’Connor, Laura
Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol
title Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol
title_full Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol
title_fullStr Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol
title_full_unstemmed Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol
title_short Factors that influence the implementation of health and social care Standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol
title_sort factors that influence the implementation of health and social care standards: a systematic review and meta-summary protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337321
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13212.2
work_keys_str_mv AT kellyyvonne factorsthatinfluencetheimplementationofhealthandsocialcarestandardsasystematicreviewandmetasummaryprotocol
AT orourkeniamh factorsthatinfluencetheimplementationofhealthandsocialcarestandardsasystematicreviewandmetasummaryprotocol
AT flynnrachel factorsthatinfluencetheimplementationofhealthandsocialcarestandardsasystematicreviewandmetasummaryprotocol
AT hegartyjosephine factorsthatinfluencetheimplementationofhealthandsocialcarestandardsasystematicreviewandmetasummaryprotocol
AT oconnorlaura factorsthatinfluencetheimplementationofhealthandsocialcarestandardsasystematicreviewandmetasummaryprotocol