Cargando…
Longitudinal Grouping of Target Volumes for Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy of Multiple Brain Metastases
PURPOSE: Treatment of multiple brain metastases with single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy causes unnecessary exposure to normal brain tissue. In this study, a longitudinal grouping method was developed to reduce such unnecessary exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This method has two main...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.578934 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: Treatment of multiple brain metastases with single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy causes unnecessary exposure to normal brain tissue. In this study, a longitudinal grouping method was developed to reduce such unnecessary exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This method has two main aspects: grouping brain lesions longitudinally according to their longitudinal projection positions in beam’s eye view, and rotating the collimator to 90° to make the multiple leaf collimator leaves conform to the targets longitudinally group by group. For 11 patients with multiple (5–30) brain metastases, two single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated using a longitudinal grouping strategy (LGS) and the conventional strategy (CVS). The prescription dose was 52 Gy for 13 fractions. Dose normalization to 100% of the prescription dose in 95% of the planning target volume was adopted. For plan quality comparison, Paddick conformity and the gradient index of the planning target volume, and the mean dose, the V(100%), V(50%), V(25%), and V(10%) volumes of normal brain tissue were calculated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the LGS and CVS plans in Paddick conformity (p = 0.374) and the gradient index (p = 0.182) of the combined planning target volumes or for V(100%) (p = 0.266) and V(50%) (p = 0.155) of the normal brain. However, the V(25%) and V(10%) of the normal brain which represented the low-dose region were significantly reduced in the LGS plans (p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively). Consistently, the mean dose of the entire normal brain was 12.04 and 11.17 Gy in the CVS and LGS plans, respectively, a significant reduction in the LGS plans (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal grouping method can decrease unnecessary exposure and reduces the low-dose range in normal brain tissue. |
---|