Cargando…
Time associations between U.S. birth rates and add-Ons to IVF practice between 2005–2016
Until 2010, the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (NASS) report, published annually by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), demonstrated almost constantly improving live birth rates following fresh non-donor (fnd) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Almos...
Autores principales: | Gleicher, Norbert, Mochizuki, Lyka, Barad, David H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34256798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00793-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Add-ons in IVF programme – Hype or Hope?
por: Datta, AK, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Ethics and IVF add-ons: We need to talk about it
por: Braga, Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The crafting of hope: Contextualising add-ons in the treatment trajectories of IVF patients
por: Perrotta, Manuela, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Establishment of comparative performance criteria for IVF centers: correlation of live birth rates in autologous and donor oocyte IVF cycles
por: Kushnir, Vitaly A, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The prevalence, promotion and pricing of three IVF add-ons on fertility clinic websites
por: van de Wiel, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2020)