Cargando…

Effectiveness of spatially targeted interventions for control of HIV, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: As infectious diseases approach global elimination targets, spatial targeting is increasingly important to identify community hotspots of transmission and effectively target interventions. We aimed to synthesise relevant evidence to define best practice approaches and identify policy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khundi, McEwen, Carpenter, James R, Nliwasa, Marriott, Cohen, Ted, Corbett, Elizabeth L, MacPherson, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044715
_version_ 1783722350718484480
author Khundi, McEwen
Carpenter, James R
Nliwasa, Marriott
Cohen, Ted
Corbett, Elizabeth L
MacPherson, Peter
author_facet Khundi, McEwen
Carpenter, James R
Nliwasa, Marriott
Cohen, Ted
Corbett, Elizabeth L
MacPherson, Peter
author_sort Khundi, McEwen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As infectious diseases approach global elimination targets, spatial targeting is increasingly important to identify community hotspots of transmission and effectively target interventions. We aimed to synthesise relevant evidence to define best practice approaches and identify policy and research gaps. OBJECTIVE: To systematically appraise evidence for the effectiveness of spatially targeted community public health interventions for HIV, tuberculosis (TB), leprosy and malaria. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews between 1 January 1993 and 22 March 2021. STUDY SELECTION: The studies had to include HIV or TB or leprosy or malaria and spatial hotspot definition, and community interventions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A data extraction tool was used. For each study, we summarised approaches to identifying hotpots, intervention design and effectiveness of the intervention. RESULTS: Ten studies, including one cluster randomised trial and nine with alternative designs (before–after, comparator area), satisfied our inclusion criteria. Spatially targeted interventions for HIV (one USA study), TB (three USA) and leprosy (two Brazil, one Federated States of Micronesia) each used household location and disease density to define hotspots followed by community-based screening. Malaria studies (one each from India, Indonesia and Kenya) used household location and disease density for hotspot identification followed by complex interventions typically combining community screening, larviciding of stagnant water bodies, indoor residual spraying and mass drug administration. Evidence of effect was mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Studies investigating spatially targeted interventions were few in number, and mostly underpowered or otherwise limited methodologically, affecting interpretation of intervention impact. Applying advanced epidemiological methodologies supporting more robust hotspot identification and larger or more intensive interventions would strengthen the evidence-base for this increasingly important approach. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019130133.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8278879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82788792021-07-30 Effectiveness of spatially targeted interventions for control of HIV, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria: a systematic review Khundi, McEwen Carpenter, James R Nliwasa, Marriott Cohen, Ted Corbett, Elizabeth L MacPherson, Peter BMJ Open Public Health BACKGROUND: As infectious diseases approach global elimination targets, spatial targeting is increasingly important to identify community hotspots of transmission and effectively target interventions. We aimed to synthesise relevant evidence to define best practice approaches and identify policy and research gaps. OBJECTIVE: To systematically appraise evidence for the effectiveness of spatially targeted community public health interventions for HIV, tuberculosis (TB), leprosy and malaria. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews between 1 January 1993 and 22 March 2021. STUDY SELECTION: The studies had to include HIV or TB or leprosy or malaria and spatial hotspot definition, and community interventions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A data extraction tool was used. For each study, we summarised approaches to identifying hotpots, intervention design and effectiveness of the intervention. RESULTS: Ten studies, including one cluster randomised trial and nine with alternative designs (before–after, comparator area), satisfied our inclusion criteria. Spatially targeted interventions for HIV (one USA study), TB (three USA) and leprosy (two Brazil, one Federated States of Micronesia) each used household location and disease density to define hotspots followed by community-based screening. Malaria studies (one each from India, Indonesia and Kenya) used household location and disease density for hotspot identification followed by complex interventions typically combining community screening, larviciding of stagnant water bodies, indoor residual spraying and mass drug administration. Evidence of effect was mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Studies investigating spatially targeted interventions were few in number, and mostly underpowered or otherwise limited methodologically, affecting interpretation of intervention impact. Applying advanced epidemiological methodologies supporting more robust hotspot identification and larger or more intensive interventions would strengthen the evidence-base for this increasingly important approach. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019130133. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8278879/ /pubmed/34257091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044715 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Khundi, McEwen
Carpenter, James R
Nliwasa, Marriott
Cohen, Ted
Corbett, Elizabeth L
MacPherson, Peter
Effectiveness of spatially targeted interventions for control of HIV, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria: a systematic review
title Effectiveness of spatially targeted interventions for control of HIV, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria: a systematic review
title_full Effectiveness of spatially targeted interventions for control of HIV, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of spatially targeted interventions for control of HIV, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of spatially targeted interventions for control of HIV, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria: a systematic review
title_short Effectiveness of spatially targeted interventions for control of HIV, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of spatially targeted interventions for control of hiv, tuberculosis, leprosy and malaria: a systematic review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8278879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34257091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044715
work_keys_str_mv AT khundimcewen effectivenessofspatiallytargetedinterventionsforcontrolofhivtuberculosisleprosyandmalariaasystematicreview
AT carpenterjamesr effectivenessofspatiallytargetedinterventionsforcontrolofhivtuberculosisleprosyandmalariaasystematicreview
AT nliwasamarriott effectivenessofspatiallytargetedinterventionsforcontrolofhivtuberculosisleprosyandmalariaasystematicreview
AT cohented effectivenessofspatiallytargetedinterventionsforcontrolofhivtuberculosisleprosyandmalariaasystematicreview
AT corbettelizabethl effectivenessofspatiallytargetedinterventionsforcontrolofhivtuberculosisleprosyandmalariaasystematicreview
AT macphersonpeter effectivenessofspatiallytargetedinterventionsforcontrolofhivtuberculosisleprosyandmalariaasystematicreview