Cargando…

A survey on modeling dynamic business processes

Dynamic and flexible systems offer huge advantages for businesses in addressing dynamic uncertain factors and implementing dynamic business processes (DBP). However, DBP remains a challenge from the perspectives of modeling, simulation, and implementation because of a nontrivial understanding of “Wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalibatiene, Diana, Vasilecas, Olegas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307861
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.609
_version_ 1783722395817738240
author Kalibatiene, Diana
Vasilecas, Olegas
author_facet Kalibatiene, Diana
Vasilecas, Olegas
author_sort Kalibatiene, Diana
collection PubMed
description Dynamic and flexible systems offer huge advantages for businesses in addressing dynamic uncertain factors and implementing dynamic business processes (DBP). However, DBP remains a challenge from the perspectives of modeling, simulation, and implementation because of a nontrivial understanding of “What is a dynamic business process?” A variety of approaches for DBP modeling and implementation have been proposed over the past years, yet few comprehensive studies analyzing DBP from different particular perspectives (e.g., business process (BP) variability, aspect oriented BP, service compositions, etc.) and research questions that lay the foundation for the development of a meaning of a DBP have been reported. The motivation behind this review is to examine DBP meaning from a global perspective and, consequently, answer the previously presented research question. Therefore, in this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) comprised of 67 papers from five respective digital libraries, which index Computer Science (CS), Information Systems (IS), and Software Engineering (SE) journals and conference proceedings. Two points of view are analyzed in the selected papers. First, we observe the similarities and differences between the proposed approaches to DBP modeling and implementation. From these observations, we define six main requirements for DBP (DBPR). In addition, the comparison of the selected papers according to DBPR shows that most of the approaches analyzed limit BP dynamicity, since they use partially predefined BP models. Secondly, we analyze the papers based on a visualization perspective that shows the less explored areas as follows: more flexible process modeling approach and its implementation in IS should be developed; usage of historic data should be extended; domain knowledge usage, like goal-orientation, multi-criteria optimization, domain knowledge, artificial intelligence, etc., should be included and extended to ensure BP dynamicity. As such, this study makes important contributions and serves as a useful resource for future DBP studies and practice. Moreover, we expect that our results could inspire researchers and practitioners towards further work aimed at bringing forward the field of DBP modeling and implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8279139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82791392021-07-22 A survey on modeling dynamic business processes Kalibatiene, Diana Vasilecas, Olegas PeerJ Comput Sci Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Dynamic and flexible systems offer huge advantages for businesses in addressing dynamic uncertain factors and implementing dynamic business processes (DBP). However, DBP remains a challenge from the perspectives of modeling, simulation, and implementation because of a nontrivial understanding of “What is a dynamic business process?” A variety of approaches for DBP modeling and implementation have been proposed over the past years, yet few comprehensive studies analyzing DBP from different particular perspectives (e.g., business process (BP) variability, aspect oriented BP, service compositions, etc.) and research questions that lay the foundation for the development of a meaning of a DBP have been reported. The motivation behind this review is to examine DBP meaning from a global perspective and, consequently, answer the previously presented research question. Therefore, in this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) comprised of 67 papers from five respective digital libraries, which index Computer Science (CS), Information Systems (IS), and Software Engineering (SE) journals and conference proceedings. Two points of view are analyzed in the selected papers. First, we observe the similarities and differences between the proposed approaches to DBP modeling and implementation. From these observations, we define six main requirements for DBP (DBPR). In addition, the comparison of the selected papers according to DBPR shows that most of the approaches analyzed limit BP dynamicity, since they use partially predefined BP models. Secondly, we analyze the papers based on a visualization perspective that shows the less explored areas as follows: more flexible process modeling approach and its implementation in IS should be developed; usage of historic data should be extended; domain knowledge usage, like goal-orientation, multi-criteria optimization, domain knowledge, artificial intelligence, etc., should be included and extended to ensure BP dynamicity. As such, this study makes important contributions and serves as a useful resource for future DBP studies and practice. Moreover, we expect that our results could inspire researchers and practitioners towards further work aimed at bringing forward the field of DBP modeling and implementation. PeerJ Inc. 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8279139/ /pubmed/34307861 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.609 Text en © 2021 Kalibatiene and Vasilecas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems
Kalibatiene, Diana
Vasilecas, Olegas
A survey on modeling dynamic business processes
title A survey on modeling dynamic business processes
title_full A survey on modeling dynamic business processes
title_fullStr A survey on modeling dynamic business processes
title_full_unstemmed A survey on modeling dynamic business processes
title_short A survey on modeling dynamic business processes
title_sort survey on modeling dynamic business processes
topic Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307861
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.609
work_keys_str_mv AT kalibatienediana asurveyonmodelingdynamicbusinessprocesses
AT vasilecasolegas asurveyonmodelingdynamicbusinessprocesses
AT kalibatienediana surveyonmodelingdynamicbusinessprocesses
AT vasilecasolegas surveyonmodelingdynamicbusinessprocesses