Cargando…
A survey on modeling dynamic business processes
Dynamic and flexible systems offer huge advantages for businesses in addressing dynamic uncertain factors and implementing dynamic business processes (DBP). However, DBP remains a challenge from the perspectives of modeling, simulation, and implementation because of a nontrivial understanding of “Wh...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307861 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.609 |
_version_ | 1783722395817738240 |
---|---|
author | Kalibatiene, Diana Vasilecas, Olegas |
author_facet | Kalibatiene, Diana Vasilecas, Olegas |
author_sort | Kalibatiene, Diana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dynamic and flexible systems offer huge advantages for businesses in addressing dynamic uncertain factors and implementing dynamic business processes (DBP). However, DBP remains a challenge from the perspectives of modeling, simulation, and implementation because of a nontrivial understanding of “What is a dynamic business process?” A variety of approaches for DBP modeling and implementation have been proposed over the past years, yet few comprehensive studies analyzing DBP from different particular perspectives (e.g., business process (BP) variability, aspect oriented BP, service compositions, etc.) and research questions that lay the foundation for the development of a meaning of a DBP have been reported. The motivation behind this review is to examine DBP meaning from a global perspective and, consequently, answer the previously presented research question. Therefore, in this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) comprised of 67 papers from five respective digital libraries, which index Computer Science (CS), Information Systems (IS), and Software Engineering (SE) journals and conference proceedings. Two points of view are analyzed in the selected papers. First, we observe the similarities and differences between the proposed approaches to DBP modeling and implementation. From these observations, we define six main requirements for DBP (DBPR). In addition, the comparison of the selected papers according to DBPR shows that most of the approaches analyzed limit BP dynamicity, since they use partially predefined BP models. Secondly, we analyze the papers based on a visualization perspective that shows the less explored areas as follows: more flexible process modeling approach and its implementation in IS should be developed; usage of historic data should be extended; domain knowledge usage, like goal-orientation, multi-criteria optimization, domain knowledge, artificial intelligence, etc., should be included and extended to ensure BP dynamicity. As such, this study makes important contributions and serves as a useful resource for future DBP studies and practice. Moreover, we expect that our results could inspire researchers and practitioners towards further work aimed at bringing forward the field of DBP modeling and implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8279139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82791392021-07-22 A survey on modeling dynamic business processes Kalibatiene, Diana Vasilecas, Olegas PeerJ Comput Sci Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Dynamic and flexible systems offer huge advantages for businesses in addressing dynamic uncertain factors and implementing dynamic business processes (DBP). However, DBP remains a challenge from the perspectives of modeling, simulation, and implementation because of a nontrivial understanding of “What is a dynamic business process?” A variety of approaches for DBP modeling and implementation have been proposed over the past years, yet few comprehensive studies analyzing DBP from different particular perspectives (e.g., business process (BP) variability, aspect oriented BP, service compositions, etc.) and research questions that lay the foundation for the development of a meaning of a DBP have been reported. The motivation behind this review is to examine DBP meaning from a global perspective and, consequently, answer the previously presented research question. Therefore, in this paper, we present a systematic literature review (SLR) comprised of 67 papers from five respective digital libraries, which index Computer Science (CS), Information Systems (IS), and Software Engineering (SE) journals and conference proceedings. Two points of view are analyzed in the selected papers. First, we observe the similarities and differences between the proposed approaches to DBP modeling and implementation. From these observations, we define six main requirements for DBP (DBPR). In addition, the comparison of the selected papers according to DBPR shows that most of the approaches analyzed limit BP dynamicity, since they use partially predefined BP models. Secondly, we analyze the papers based on a visualization perspective that shows the less explored areas as follows: more flexible process modeling approach and its implementation in IS should be developed; usage of historic data should be extended; domain knowledge usage, like goal-orientation, multi-criteria optimization, domain knowledge, artificial intelligence, etc., should be included and extended to ensure BP dynamicity. As such, this study makes important contributions and serves as a useful resource for future DBP studies and practice. Moreover, we expect that our results could inspire researchers and practitioners towards further work aimed at bringing forward the field of DBP modeling and implementation. PeerJ Inc. 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8279139/ /pubmed/34307861 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.609 Text en © 2021 Kalibatiene and Vasilecas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Kalibatiene, Diana Vasilecas, Olegas A survey on modeling dynamic business processes |
title | A survey on modeling dynamic business processes |
title_full | A survey on modeling dynamic business processes |
title_fullStr | A survey on modeling dynamic business processes |
title_full_unstemmed | A survey on modeling dynamic business processes |
title_short | A survey on modeling dynamic business processes |
title_sort | survey on modeling dynamic business processes |
topic | Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307861 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.609 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalibatienediana asurveyonmodelingdynamicbusinessprocesses AT vasilecasolegas asurveyonmodelingdynamicbusinessprocesses AT kalibatienediana surveyonmodelingdynamicbusinessprocesses AT vasilecasolegas surveyonmodelingdynamicbusinessprocesses |