Cargando…
Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya
BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a parasitic infectious disease that is transmitted by several species of mosquitoes. Diagnosis of LF is done in both human hosts and vectors. Effective mosquito collection method(s) is/are required in order to collect large numbers of mosquitoes with high cha...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The East African Health Research Commission
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34308176 http://dx.doi.org/10.24248/EAHRJ-D-16-00401 |
_version_ | 1783722411887165440 |
---|---|
author | Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu Ng'ang'a, Zipporah Wangui Kamau, Luna Kagai, Jim Mwaniki |
author_facet | Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu Ng'ang'a, Zipporah Wangui Kamau, Luna Kagai, Jim Mwaniki |
author_sort | Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a parasitic infectious disease that is transmitted by several species of mosquitoes. Diagnosis of LF is done in both human hosts and vectors. Effective mosquito collection method(s) is/are required in order to collect large numbers of mosquitoes with high chances of infectivity. METHODS: In this study, 3 mosquito sampling methods were compared. Mosquitoes were collected from 6 randomly selected villages of Tana River County, Kenya. The effectiveness of CDC light traps, gravid traps, and pyrethrum spray methods in collecting mosquitoes were compared. Mosquitoes were morphologically identified into genera and species level, and mosquito dissection was done in search of microfilariae larvae to assess the infection and infectivity rates. Data was analysed by SPSS version 15.0 and analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: A total of 1632 female mosquitoes were collected belonging to 5 mosquito genera: Culex, Anopheles, Aedes, Mansonia, and Ficalbia. The most abundant mosquito genera was Culex. Light traps obtained the most blood-fed mosquitoes. CONCLUSION: Light traps were found to be the most effective method of mosquito collection in terms of high catches and high infectivities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8279214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The East African Health Research Commission |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82792142021-07-22 Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu Ng'ang'a, Zipporah Wangui Kamau, Luna Kagai, Jim Mwaniki East Afr Health Res J Original Articles BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a parasitic infectious disease that is transmitted by several species of mosquitoes. Diagnosis of LF is done in both human hosts and vectors. Effective mosquito collection method(s) is/are required in order to collect large numbers of mosquitoes with high chances of infectivity. METHODS: In this study, 3 mosquito sampling methods were compared. Mosquitoes were collected from 6 randomly selected villages of Tana River County, Kenya. The effectiveness of CDC light traps, gravid traps, and pyrethrum spray methods in collecting mosquitoes were compared. Mosquitoes were morphologically identified into genera and species level, and mosquito dissection was done in search of microfilariae larvae to assess the infection and infectivity rates. Data was analysed by SPSS version 15.0 and analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: A total of 1632 female mosquitoes were collected belonging to 5 mosquito genera: Culex, Anopheles, Aedes, Mansonia, and Ficalbia. The most abundant mosquito genera was Culex. Light traps obtained the most blood-fed mosquitoes. CONCLUSION: Light traps were found to be the most effective method of mosquito collection in terms of high catches and high infectivities. The East African Health Research Commission 2018 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8279214/ /pubmed/34308176 http://dx.doi.org/10.24248/EAHRJ-D-16-00401 Text en © The East African Health Research Commission 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu Ng'ang'a, Zipporah Wangui Kamau, Luna Kagai, Jim Mwaniki Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya |
title | Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya |
title_full | Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya |
title_short | Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya |
title_sort | comparison of indoor mosquito collection methods in the assessment of lymphatic filariasis transmission dynamics in mosquito vectors in tana river county, kenya |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34308176 http://dx.doi.org/10.24248/EAHRJ-D-16-00401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kinyattanancymutanu comparisonofindoormosquitocollectionmethodsintheassessmentoflymphaticfilariasistransmissiondynamicsinmosquitovectorsintanarivercountykenya AT ngangazipporahwangui comparisonofindoormosquitocollectionmethodsintheassessmentoflymphaticfilariasistransmissiondynamicsinmosquitovectorsintanarivercountykenya AT kamauluna comparisonofindoormosquitocollectionmethodsintheassessmentoflymphaticfilariasistransmissiondynamicsinmosquitovectorsintanarivercountykenya AT kagaijimmwaniki comparisonofindoormosquitocollectionmethodsintheassessmentoflymphaticfilariasistransmissiondynamicsinmosquitovectorsintanarivercountykenya |