Cargando…

Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a parasitic infectious disease that is transmitted by several species of mosquitoes. Diagnosis of LF is done in both human hosts and vectors. Effective mosquito collection method(s) is/are required in order to collect large numbers of mosquitoes with high cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu, Ng'ang'a, Zipporah Wangui, Kamau, Luna, Kagai, Jim Mwaniki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The East African Health Research Commission 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34308176
http://dx.doi.org/10.24248/EAHRJ-D-16-00401
_version_ 1783722411887165440
author Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu
Ng'ang'a, Zipporah Wangui
Kamau, Luna
Kagai, Jim Mwaniki
author_facet Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu
Ng'ang'a, Zipporah Wangui
Kamau, Luna
Kagai, Jim Mwaniki
author_sort Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a parasitic infectious disease that is transmitted by several species of mosquitoes. Diagnosis of LF is done in both human hosts and vectors. Effective mosquito collection method(s) is/are required in order to collect large numbers of mosquitoes with high chances of infectivity. METHODS: In this study, 3 mosquito sampling methods were compared. Mosquitoes were collected from 6 randomly selected villages of Tana River County, Kenya. The effectiveness of CDC light traps, gravid traps, and pyrethrum spray methods in collecting mosquitoes were compared. Mosquitoes were morphologically identified into genera and species level, and mosquito dissection was done in search of microfilariae larvae to assess the infection and infectivity rates. Data was analysed by SPSS version 15.0 and analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: A total of 1632 female mosquitoes were collected belonging to 5 mosquito genera: Culex, Anopheles, Aedes, Mansonia, and Ficalbia. The most abundant mosquito genera was Culex. Light traps obtained the most blood-fed mosquitoes. CONCLUSION: Light traps were found to be the most effective method of mosquito collection in terms of high catches and high infectivities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8279214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The East African Health Research Commission
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82792142021-07-22 Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu Ng'ang'a, Zipporah Wangui Kamau, Luna Kagai, Jim Mwaniki East Afr Health Res J Original Articles BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a parasitic infectious disease that is transmitted by several species of mosquitoes. Diagnosis of LF is done in both human hosts and vectors. Effective mosquito collection method(s) is/are required in order to collect large numbers of mosquitoes with high chances of infectivity. METHODS: In this study, 3 mosquito sampling methods were compared. Mosquitoes were collected from 6 randomly selected villages of Tana River County, Kenya. The effectiveness of CDC light traps, gravid traps, and pyrethrum spray methods in collecting mosquitoes were compared. Mosquitoes were morphologically identified into genera and species level, and mosquito dissection was done in search of microfilariae larvae to assess the infection and infectivity rates. Data was analysed by SPSS version 15.0 and analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: A total of 1632 female mosquitoes were collected belonging to 5 mosquito genera: Culex, Anopheles, Aedes, Mansonia, and Ficalbia. The most abundant mosquito genera was Culex. Light traps obtained the most blood-fed mosquitoes. CONCLUSION: Light traps were found to be the most effective method of mosquito collection in terms of high catches and high infectivities. The East African Health Research Commission 2018 2018-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8279214/ /pubmed/34308176 http://dx.doi.org/10.24248/EAHRJ-D-16-00401 Text en © The East African Health Research Commission 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kinyatta, Nancy Mutanu
Ng'ang'a, Zipporah Wangui
Kamau, Luna
Kagai, Jim Mwaniki
Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya
title Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya
title_full Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya
title_fullStr Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya
title_short Comparison of Indoor Mosquito Collection Methods in the Assessment of Lymphatic Filariasis Transmission Dynamics in Mosquito Vectors in Tana River County, Kenya
title_sort comparison of indoor mosquito collection methods in the assessment of lymphatic filariasis transmission dynamics in mosquito vectors in tana river county, kenya
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34308176
http://dx.doi.org/10.24248/EAHRJ-D-16-00401
work_keys_str_mv AT kinyattanancymutanu comparisonofindoormosquitocollectionmethodsintheassessmentoflymphaticfilariasistransmissiondynamicsinmosquitovectorsintanarivercountykenya
AT ngangazipporahwangui comparisonofindoormosquitocollectionmethodsintheassessmentoflymphaticfilariasistransmissiondynamicsinmosquitovectorsintanarivercountykenya
AT kamauluna comparisonofindoormosquitocollectionmethodsintheassessmentoflymphaticfilariasistransmissiondynamicsinmosquitovectorsintanarivercountykenya
AT kagaijimmwaniki comparisonofindoormosquitocollectionmethodsintheassessmentoflymphaticfilariasistransmissiondynamicsinmosquitovectorsintanarivercountykenya