Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain is experienced by numerous patients; thus, the main pain-relieving opioid analgesics, fentanyl and morphine, are of great importance. However, their analgesic efficacy and safety are different among individuals and are still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manirakiza, Astère, Irakoze, Laurent, Manirakiza, Sébastien, Bizimana, Prudence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The East African Health Research Commission 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34308214
http://dx.doi.org/10.24248/eahrj.v4i1.617
_version_ 1783722419453689856
author Manirakiza, Astère
Irakoze, Laurent
Manirakiza, Sébastien
Bizimana, Prudence
author_facet Manirakiza, Astère
Irakoze, Laurent
Manirakiza, Sébastien
Bizimana, Prudence
author_sort Manirakiza, Astère
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer pain is experienced by numerous patients; thus, the main pain-relieving opioid analgesics, fentanyl and morphine, are of great importance. However, their analgesic efficacy and safety are different among individuals and are still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of fentanyl and morphine among patients with cancer. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library up to 01 April 2019. The search terms were fentanyl, morphine, opioids and cancer pain. All randomised controlled trials comparing fentanyl and morphine were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Overall, the initial search identified 2970 published studies; among them, 9 studies were included in the efficacy analysis and 8 studies were included in the safety analysis. The oral morphine versus oral transmucosal fentanyl subgroup analysis showed a mean difference(MD)=0.47[Confidence interval(CI):0.35-0.58] with an overall effect, Z=8.10, P<.00001. The outcome of the oral morphine versus nasal/transdermal fentanyl subgroup indicated a MD=0.20[CI:0.3-0.37] with an overall effect, Z=2.24 and P=.02. For the oral morphine versus buccal/sublingual fentanyl subgroup, the analysis revealed a MD=1.80[CI:1.35-2.25] with an overall effect, Z=7.87 and P<.00001. The oral morphine versus other forms of fentanyl subgroup showed a MD=0.70[95%CI:0.34-1.06] with the test for the overall effect, Z=3.81 and P=.0001. Constipation, drowsiness, confusion and dry mouth were more common in the morphine group than in the fentanyl group, with a risk ratio=0.60[CI:0.37-0.97]; 0.93[CI:0.69-1.25]; 0.85[CI:0.23-3.13] and 0.54[CI:0.05-6.43], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with oral morphine, fentanyl is safer and more effective. Moreover, fentanyl presents fewer side effects than morphine, especially constipation, drowsiness, confusion and dry mouth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8279272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The East African Health Research Commission
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82792722021-07-22 Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Manirakiza, Astère Irakoze, Laurent Manirakiza, Sébastien Bizimana, Prudence East Afr Health Res J Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Cancer pain is experienced by numerous patients; thus, the main pain-relieving opioid analgesics, fentanyl and morphine, are of great importance. However, their analgesic efficacy and safety are different among individuals and are still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of fentanyl and morphine among patients with cancer. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library up to 01 April 2019. The search terms were fentanyl, morphine, opioids and cancer pain. All randomised controlled trials comparing fentanyl and morphine were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Overall, the initial search identified 2970 published studies; among them, 9 studies were included in the efficacy analysis and 8 studies were included in the safety analysis. The oral morphine versus oral transmucosal fentanyl subgroup analysis showed a mean difference(MD)=0.47[Confidence interval(CI):0.35-0.58] with an overall effect, Z=8.10, P<.00001. The outcome of the oral morphine versus nasal/transdermal fentanyl subgroup indicated a MD=0.20[CI:0.3-0.37] with an overall effect, Z=2.24 and P=.02. For the oral morphine versus buccal/sublingual fentanyl subgroup, the analysis revealed a MD=1.80[CI:1.35-2.25] with an overall effect, Z=7.87 and P<.00001. The oral morphine versus other forms of fentanyl subgroup showed a MD=0.70[95%CI:0.34-1.06] with the test for the overall effect, Z=3.81 and P=.0001. Constipation, drowsiness, confusion and dry mouth were more common in the morphine group than in the fentanyl group, with a risk ratio=0.60[CI:0.37-0.97]; 0.93[CI:0.69-1.25]; 0.85[CI:0.23-3.13] and 0.54[CI:0.05-6.43], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with oral morphine, fentanyl is safer and more effective. Moreover, fentanyl presents fewer side effects than morphine, especially constipation, drowsiness, confusion and dry mouth. The East African Health Research Commission 2020 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8279272/ /pubmed/34308214 http://dx.doi.org/10.24248/eahrj.v4i1.617 Text en © The East African Health Research Commission 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Manirakiza, Astère
Irakoze, Laurent
Manirakiza, Sébastien
Bizimana, Prudence
Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of fentanyl compared with morphine among adult patients with cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34308214
http://dx.doi.org/10.24248/eahrj.v4i1.617
work_keys_str_mv AT manirakizaastere efficacyandsafetyoffentanylcomparedwithmorphineamongadultpatientswithcancerametaanalysis
AT irakozelaurent efficacyandsafetyoffentanylcomparedwithmorphineamongadultpatientswithcancerametaanalysis
AT manirakizasebastien efficacyandsafetyoffentanylcomparedwithmorphineamongadultpatientswithcancerametaanalysis
AT bizimanaprudence efficacyandsafetyoffentanylcomparedwithmorphineamongadultpatientswithcancerametaanalysis