Cargando…

Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning

Current approaches to understanding medication ordering errors rely on relatively small manually captured error samples. These approaches are resource-intensive, do not scale for computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, and are likely to miss important risk factors associated with medicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Christopher Ryan, Abraham, Joanna, Fritz, Bradley A., Cui, Zhicheng, Galanter, William, Chen, Yixin, Kannampallil, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34260662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254358
_version_ 1783722447648849920
author King, Christopher Ryan
Abraham, Joanna
Fritz, Bradley A.
Cui, Zhicheng
Galanter, William
Chen, Yixin
Kannampallil, Thomas
author_facet King, Christopher Ryan
Abraham, Joanna
Fritz, Bradley A.
Cui, Zhicheng
Galanter, William
Chen, Yixin
Kannampallil, Thomas
author_sort King, Christopher Ryan
collection PubMed
description Current approaches to understanding medication ordering errors rely on relatively small manually captured error samples. These approaches are resource-intensive, do not scale for computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, and are likely to miss important risk factors associated with medication ordering errors. Previously, we described a dataset of CPOE-based medication voiding accompanied by univariable and multivariable regression analyses. However, these traditional techniques require expert guidance and may perform poorly compared to newer approaches. In this paper, we update that analysis using machine learning (ML) models to predict erroneous medication orders and identify its contributing factors. We retrieved patient demographics (race/ethnicity, sex, age), clinician characteristics, type of medication order (inpatient, prescription, home medication by history), and order content. We compared logistic regression, random forest, boosted decision trees, and artificial neural network models. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The dataset included 5,804,192 medication orders, of which 28,695 (0.5%) were voided. ML correctly classified voids at reasonable accuracy; with a positive predictive value of 10%, ~20% of errors were included. Gradient boosted decision trees achieved the highest AUROC (0.7968) and AUPRC (0.0647) among all models. Logistic regression had the poorest performance. Models identified predictive factors with high face validity (e.g., student orders), and a decision tree revealed interacting contexts with high rates of errors not identified by previous regression models. Prediction models using order-entry information offers promise for error surveillance, patient safety improvements, and targeted clinical review. The improved performance of models with complex interactions points to the importance of contextual medication ordering information for understanding contributors to medication errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8279397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82793972021-07-31 Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning King, Christopher Ryan Abraham, Joanna Fritz, Bradley A. Cui, Zhicheng Galanter, William Chen, Yixin Kannampallil, Thomas PLoS One Research Article Current approaches to understanding medication ordering errors rely on relatively small manually captured error samples. These approaches are resource-intensive, do not scale for computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, and are likely to miss important risk factors associated with medication ordering errors. Previously, we described a dataset of CPOE-based medication voiding accompanied by univariable and multivariable regression analyses. However, these traditional techniques require expert guidance and may perform poorly compared to newer approaches. In this paper, we update that analysis using machine learning (ML) models to predict erroneous medication orders and identify its contributing factors. We retrieved patient demographics (race/ethnicity, sex, age), clinician characteristics, type of medication order (inpatient, prescription, home medication by history), and order content. We compared logistic regression, random forest, boosted decision trees, and artificial neural network models. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The dataset included 5,804,192 medication orders, of which 28,695 (0.5%) were voided. ML correctly classified voids at reasonable accuracy; with a positive predictive value of 10%, ~20% of errors were included. Gradient boosted decision trees achieved the highest AUROC (0.7968) and AUPRC (0.0647) among all models. Logistic regression had the poorest performance. Models identified predictive factors with high face validity (e.g., student orders), and a decision tree revealed interacting contexts with high rates of errors not identified by previous regression models. Prediction models using order-entry information offers promise for error surveillance, patient safety improvements, and targeted clinical review. The improved performance of models with complex interactions points to the importance of contextual medication ordering information for understanding contributors to medication errors. Public Library of Science 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8279397/ /pubmed/34260662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254358 Text en © 2021 King et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
King, Christopher Ryan
Abraham, Joanna
Fritz, Bradley A.
Cui, Zhicheng
Galanter, William
Chen, Yixin
Kannampallil, Thomas
Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning
title Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning
title_full Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning
title_fullStr Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning
title_short Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning
title_sort predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34260662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254358
work_keys_str_mv AT kingchristopherryan predictingselfinterceptedmedicationorderingerrorsusingmachinelearning
AT abrahamjoanna predictingselfinterceptedmedicationorderingerrorsusingmachinelearning
AT fritzbradleya predictingselfinterceptedmedicationorderingerrorsusingmachinelearning
AT cuizhicheng predictingselfinterceptedmedicationorderingerrorsusingmachinelearning
AT galanterwilliam predictingselfinterceptedmedicationorderingerrorsusingmachinelearning
AT chenyixin predictingselfinterceptedmedicationorderingerrorsusingmachinelearning
AT kannampallilthomas predictingselfinterceptedmedicationorderingerrorsusingmachinelearning