Cargando…

Association between attendance at an American diabetes camp and improvements in glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated glycaemic control using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals before and after attendance at a diabetes camp or by comparing control groups at home to control groups at camp. METHODS: Youth (6–17 years) with T1D and receiving insulin therapy were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darukhanavala, Amy, Puhr, Sarah, Dinunno, Kyle, Alfego, David, Welsh, John, Butler, Lynn, Magyar, Kendra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.254
_version_ 1783722494068260864
author Darukhanavala, Amy
Puhr, Sarah
Dinunno, Kyle
Alfego, David
Welsh, John
Butler, Lynn
Magyar, Kendra
author_facet Darukhanavala, Amy
Puhr, Sarah
Dinunno, Kyle
Alfego, David
Welsh, John
Butler, Lynn
Magyar, Kendra
author_sort Darukhanavala, Amy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated glycaemic control using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals before and after attendance at a diabetes camp or by comparing control groups at home to control groups at camp. METHODS: Youth (6–17 years) with T1D and receiving insulin therapy were enrolled at a week‐long diabetes camp. They participated in three clinic visits: at the start of a week at home, by initiating a Dexcom G6 CGM system; at the start of a week at camp, where the home week G6 was removed and a camp week G6 was inserted; and after camp, where the camp week G6 was removed. We administered Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) surveys at the second and third visits. Participants with <80% CGM data coverage or who did not complete all PAID surveys were excluded from analysis. We compared glycaemic control and PAID scores between the week at home and week at camp. RESULTS: Of 76 enrolled campers, 69 completed the study and 52 had results that qualified for analysis. The mean participant age was 12.5 ± 2.2 years. Camp was associated with significantly improved treatment satisfaction, time in desired glucose range and insulin sensitivity. Time in hyperglycaemia and basal insulin requirements decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes camp is associated with significant improvements in diabetes treatment satisfaction and glycaemic control compared to home care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8279631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82796312021-07-15 Association between attendance at an American diabetes camp and improvements in glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction Darukhanavala, Amy Puhr, Sarah Dinunno, Kyle Alfego, David Welsh, John Butler, Lynn Magyar, Kendra Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Original Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated glycaemic control using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals before and after attendance at a diabetes camp or by comparing control groups at home to control groups at camp. METHODS: Youth (6–17 years) with T1D and receiving insulin therapy were enrolled at a week‐long diabetes camp. They participated in three clinic visits: at the start of a week at home, by initiating a Dexcom G6 CGM system; at the start of a week at camp, where the home week G6 was removed and a camp week G6 was inserted; and after camp, where the camp week G6 was removed. We administered Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) surveys at the second and third visits. Participants with <80% CGM data coverage or who did not complete all PAID surveys were excluded from analysis. We compared glycaemic control and PAID scores between the week at home and week at camp. RESULTS: Of 76 enrolled campers, 69 completed the study and 52 had results that qualified for analysis. The mean participant age was 12.5 ± 2.2 years. Camp was associated with significantly improved treatment satisfaction, time in desired glucose range and insulin sensitivity. Time in hyperglycaemia and basal insulin requirements decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes camp is associated with significant improvements in diabetes treatment satisfaction and glycaemic control compared to home care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8279631/ /pubmed/34277978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.254 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Darukhanavala, Amy
Puhr, Sarah
Dinunno, Kyle
Alfego, David
Welsh, John
Butler, Lynn
Magyar, Kendra
Association between attendance at an American diabetes camp and improvements in glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction
title Association between attendance at an American diabetes camp and improvements in glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction
title_full Association between attendance at an American diabetes camp and improvements in glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction
title_fullStr Association between attendance at an American diabetes camp and improvements in glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed Association between attendance at an American diabetes camp and improvements in glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction
title_short Association between attendance at an American diabetes camp and improvements in glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction
title_sort association between attendance at an american diabetes camp and improvements in glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/edm2.254
work_keys_str_mv AT darukhanavalaamy associationbetweenattendanceatanamericandiabetescampandimprovementsinglycaemiccontrolandtreatmentsatisfaction
AT puhrsarah associationbetweenattendanceatanamericandiabetescampandimprovementsinglycaemiccontrolandtreatmentsatisfaction
AT dinunnokyle associationbetweenattendanceatanamericandiabetescampandimprovementsinglycaemiccontrolandtreatmentsatisfaction
AT alfegodavid associationbetweenattendanceatanamericandiabetescampandimprovementsinglycaemiccontrolandtreatmentsatisfaction
AT welshjohn associationbetweenattendanceatanamericandiabetescampandimprovementsinglycaemiccontrolandtreatmentsatisfaction
AT butlerlynn associationbetweenattendanceatanamericandiabetescampandimprovementsinglycaemiccontrolandtreatmentsatisfaction
AT magyarkendra associationbetweenattendanceatanamericandiabetescampandimprovementsinglycaemiccontrolandtreatmentsatisfaction