Cargando…

Value of 3-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping

BACKGROUND: The current gold standard for evaluation of the surgical result after intracranial aneurysm (IA) clipping is two-dimensional (2D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA). While there is growing evidence that postoperative 3D-DSA is superior to 2D-DSA, there is a lack of data on intraoperat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marbacher, Serge, Halter, Matthias, Vogt, Deborah R, Kienzler, Jenny C, Magyar, Christian T J, Wanderer, Stefan, Anon, Javier, Diepers, Michael, Remonda, Luca, Fandino, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33861324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab087
_version_ 1783722524122546176
author Marbacher, Serge
Halter, Matthias
Vogt, Deborah R
Kienzler, Jenny C
Magyar, Christian T J
Wanderer, Stefan
Anon, Javier
Diepers, Michael
Remonda, Luca
Fandino, Javier
author_facet Marbacher, Serge
Halter, Matthias
Vogt, Deborah R
Kienzler, Jenny C
Magyar, Christian T J
Wanderer, Stefan
Anon, Javier
Diepers, Michael
Remonda, Luca
Fandino, Javier
author_sort Marbacher, Serge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current gold standard for evaluation of the surgical result after intracranial aneurysm (IA) clipping is two-dimensional (2D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA). While there is growing evidence that postoperative 3D-DSA is superior to 2D-DSA, there is a lack of data on intraoperative comparison. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic yield of detection of IA remnants in intra- and postoperative 3D-DSA, categorize the remnants based on 3D-DSA findings, and examine associations between missed 2D-DSA remnants and IA characteristics. METHODS: We evaluated 232 clipped IAs that were examined with intraoperative or postoperative 3D-DSA. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, IA and remnant distinguishing characteristics, and 2D- and 3D-DSA findings. Maximal IA remnant size detected by 3D-DSA was measured using a 3-point scale of 2-mm increments. RESULTS: Although 3D-DSA detected all clipped IA remnants, 2D-DSA missed 30.4% (7 of 23) and 38.9% (14 of 36) clipped IA remnants in intraoperative and postoperative imaging, respectively (95% CI: 30 [ 12, 49] %; P-value .023 and 39 [23, 55] %; P-value = <.001), and more often missed grade 1 (< 2 mm) clipped remnants (odds ratio [95% CI]: 4.3 [1.6, 12.7], P-value .005). CONCLUSION: Compared with 2D-DSA, 3D-DSA achieves a better diagnostic yield in the evaluation of clipped IA. Our proposed method to grade 3D-DSA remnants proved to be simple and practical. Especially small IA remnants have a high risk to be missed in 2D-DSA. We advocate routine use of either intraoperative or postoperative 3D-DSA as a baseline for lifelong follow-up of clipped IA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8279834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82798342021-07-15 Value of 3-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping Marbacher, Serge Halter, Matthias Vogt, Deborah R Kienzler, Jenny C Magyar, Christian T J Wanderer, Stefan Anon, Javier Diepers, Michael Remonda, Luca Fandino, Javier Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Technique Assessment BACKGROUND: The current gold standard for evaluation of the surgical result after intracranial aneurysm (IA) clipping is two-dimensional (2D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA). While there is growing evidence that postoperative 3D-DSA is superior to 2D-DSA, there is a lack of data on intraoperative comparison. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic yield of detection of IA remnants in intra- and postoperative 3D-DSA, categorize the remnants based on 3D-DSA findings, and examine associations between missed 2D-DSA remnants and IA characteristics. METHODS: We evaluated 232 clipped IAs that were examined with intraoperative or postoperative 3D-DSA. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, IA and remnant distinguishing characteristics, and 2D- and 3D-DSA findings. Maximal IA remnant size detected by 3D-DSA was measured using a 3-point scale of 2-mm increments. RESULTS: Although 3D-DSA detected all clipped IA remnants, 2D-DSA missed 30.4% (7 of 23) and 38.9% (14 of 36) clipped IA remnants in intraoperative and postoperative imaging, respectively (95% CI: 30 [ 12, 49] %; P-value .023 and 39 [23, 55] %; P-value = <.001), and more often missed grade 1 (< 2 mm) clipped remnants (odds ratio [95% CI]: 4.3 [1.6, 12.7], P-value .005). CONCLUSION: Compared with 2D-DSA, 3D-DSA achieves a better diagnostic yield in the evaluation of clipped IA. Our proposed method to grade 3D-DSA remnants proved to be simple and practical. Especially small IA remnants have a high risk to be missed in 2D-DSA. We advocate routine use of either intraoperative or postoperative 3D-DSA as a baseline for lifelong follow-up of clipped IA. Oxford University Press 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8279834/ /pubmed/33861324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab087 Text en © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Technique Assessment
Marbacher, Serge
Halter, Matthias
Vogt, Deborah R
Kienzler, Jenny C
Magyar, Christian T J
Wanderer, Stefan
Anon, Javier
Diepers, Michael
Remonda, Luca
Fandino, Javier
Value of 3-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping
title Value of 3-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping
title_full Value of 3-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping
title_fullStr Value of 3-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping
title_full_unstemmed Value of 3-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping
title_short Value of 3-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping
title_sort value of 3-dimensional digital subtraction angiography for detection and classification of intracranial aneurysm remnants after clipping
topic Technique Assessment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33861324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab087
work_keys_str_mv AT marbacherserge valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping
AT haltermatthias valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping
AT vogtdeborahr valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping
AT kienzlerjennyc valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping
AT magyarchristiantj valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping
AT wandererstefan valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping
AT anonjavier valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping
AT diepersmichael valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping
AT remondaluca valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping
AT fandinojavier valueof3dimensionaldigitalsubtractionangiographyfordetectionandclassificationofintracranialaneurysmremnantsafterclipping