Cargando…
A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of right hemicolectomy with CME performed with laparoscopic and open surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov register were searched. P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03891-0 |
_version_ | 1783722564532568064 |
---|---|
author | Anania, Gabriele Arezzo, Alberto Davies, Richard Justin Marchetti, Francesco Zhang, Shu Di Saverio, Salomone Cirocchi, Roberto Donini, Annibale |
author_facet | Anania, Gabriele Arezzo, Alberto Davies, Richard Justin Marchetti, Francesco Zhang, Shu Di Saverio, Salomone Cirocchi, Roberto Donini, Annibale |
author_sort | Anania, Gabriele |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of right hemicolectomy with CME performed with laparoscopic and open surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov register were searched. Primary outcome was the overall number of harvested lymph nodes. Secondary outcomes were short and long-term course variables. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were identified with 5038 patients enrolled. The difference in number of harvested lymph nodes was not statistically significant (MD 0.68, − 0.41–1.76, P = 0.22). The only RCT shows a significant advantage in favour of laparoscopy (MD 3.30, 95% CI − 0.20–6.40, P = 0.04). The analysis of CCTs showed an advantage in favour of the laparoscopic group, but the result was not statically significantly (MD − 0.55, 95% CI − 0.57–1.67, P = 0.33). The overall incidence of local recurrence was not different between the groups, while systemic recurrence at 5 years was lower in laparoscopic group. Laparoscopy showed better short-term outcomes including overall complications, lower estimated blood loss, lower wound infections and shorter hospital stay, despite a longer operative time. The rate of anastomotic and chyle leak was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the several limitations of this study, we found that the median number of lymph node harvested in the laparoscopic group is not different compared to open surgery. Laparoscopy was associated with a lower incidence of systemic recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-021-03891-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8280018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82800182021-07-20 A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision Anania, Gabriele Arezzo, Alberto Davies, Richard Justin Marchetti, Francesco Zhang, Shu Di Saverio, Salomone Cirocchi, Roberto Donini, Annibale Int J Colorectal Dis Review PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of right hemicolectomy with CME performed with laparoscopic and open surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov register were searched. Primary outcome was the overall number of harvested lymph nodes. Secondary outcomes were short and long-term course variables. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were identified with 5038 patients enrolled. The difference in number of harvested lymph nodes was not statistically significant (MD 0.68, − 0.41–1.76, P = 0.22). The only RCT shows a significant advantage in favour of laparoscopy (MD 3.30, 95% CI − 0.20–6.40, P = 0.04). The analysis of CCTs showed an advantage in favour of the laparoscopic group, but the result was not statically significantly (MD − 0.55, 95% CI − 0.57–1.67, P = 0.33). The overall incidence of local recurrence was not different between the groups, while systemic recurrence at 5 years was lower in laparoscopic group. Laparoscopy showed better short-term outcomes including overall complications, lower estimated blood loss, lower wound infections and shorter hospital stay, despite a longer operative time. The rate of anastomotic and chyle leak was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the several limitations of this study, we found that the median number of lymph node harvested in the laparoscopic group is not different compared to open surgery. Laparoscopy was associated with a lower incidence of systemic recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-021-03891-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-01 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8280018/ /pubmed/33644837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03891-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Anania, Gabriele Arezzo, Alberto Davies, Richard Justin Marchetti, Francesco Zhang, Shu Di Saverio, Salomone Cirocchi, Roberto Donini, Annibale A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision |
title | A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision |
title_full | A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision |
title_fullStr | A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision |
title_full_unstemmed | A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision |
title_short | A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision |
title_sort | global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03891-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ananiagabriele aglobalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT arezzoalberto aglobalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT daviesrichardjustin aglobalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT marchettifrancesco aglobalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT zhangshu aglobalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT disaveriosalomone aglobalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT cirocchiroberto aglobalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT doniniannibale aglobalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT ananiagabriele globalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT arezzoalberto globalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT daviesrichardjustin globalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT marchettifrancesco globalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT zhangshu globalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT disaveriosalomone globalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT cirocchiroberto globalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision AT doniniannibale globalsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisonlaparoscopicvsopenrighthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcision |