Cargando…
Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia
BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used diagnostic method with no widely accepted quality measure. We assessed quality indicator—composite detection rate (CDR)—consisting of detection of at least one of the following: cervical inlet patch, gastric polyp and post-ulcer duodenal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-021-01790-3 |
_version_ | 1783722566558416896 |
---|---|
author | Romańczyk, Marcin Ostrowski, Bartosz Marek, Tomasz Romańczyk, Tomasz Błaszczyńska, Małgorzata Budzyń, Krzysztof Bugajski, Maciej Koziej, Mateusz Kajor, Maciej Januszewski, Krzysztof Zajęcki, Wojciech Waluga, Marek Hartleb, Marek |
author_facet | Romańczyk, Marcin Ostrowski, Bartosz Marek, Tomasz Romańczyk, Tomasz Błaszczyńska, Małgorzata Budzyń, Krzysztof Bugajski, Maciej Koziej, Mateusz Kajor, Maciej Januszewski, Krzysztof Zajęcki, Wojciech Waluga, Marek Hartleb, Marek |
author_sort | Romańczyk, Marcin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used diagnostic method with no widely accepted quality measure. We assessed quality indicator—composite detection rate (CDR)—consisting of detection of at least one of the following: cervical inlet patch, gastric polyp and post-ulcer duodenal bulb deformation. The aim of the study was to validate CDR according to detection rate of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms (UGN). METHODS: It was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted from January 2019 to October 2019. The endoscopic reports from 2896 symptomatic patients who underwent diagnostic EGD were analyzed. The EGDs were performed in three endoscopy units located in tertiary university hospital, private outpatient clinic and local hospital. RESULTS: 64 UGNs were detected. The mean CDR was 21.9%. The CDR correlated with UGN detection rate (R = 0.49, p = 0.045). Based on CDR quartiles, operators were divided into group 1 with CDR < 10%, group 2 with CDR 10–17%, group 3 with CDR 17.1–26%, and group 4 with CDR > 26%. Detection rate of UGN was significantly higher in the group 4 in comparison to group 1 (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.2 − 9.0). In the multivariate regression model, patient age, male gender and operator’s CDR > 26% were independent risk factors of UGN detection (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 − 1.05, OR 2; 95% CI 1.2 − 3.5, and OR 5.7 95% CI 1.5 − 22.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The CDR is associated with the detection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms. This parameter may be a useful quality measure of EGD to be applied in general setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8280029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82800292021-07-20 Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia Romańczyk, Marcin Ostrowski, Bartosz Marek, Tomasz Romańczyk, Tomasz Błaszczyńska, Małgorzata Budzyń, Krzysztof Bugajski, Maciej Koziej, Mateusz Kajor, Maciej Januszewski, Krzysztof Zajęcki, Wojciech Waluga, Marek Hartleb, Marek J Gastroenterol Original Article—Alimentary Tract BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used diagnostic method with no widely accepted quality measure. We assessed quality indicator—composite detection rate (CDR)—consisting of detection of at least one of the following: cervical inlet patch, gastric polyp and post-ulcer duodenal bulb deformation. The aim of the study was to validate CDR according to detection rate of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms (UGN). METHODS: It was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted from January 2019 to October 2019. The endoscopic reports from 2896 symptomatic patients who underwent diagnostic EGD were analyzed. The EGDs were performed in three endoscopy units located in tertiary university hospital, private outpatient clinic and local hospital. RESULTS: 64 UGNs were detected. The mean CDR was 21.9%. The CDR correlated with UGN detection rate (R = 0.49, p = 0.045). Based on CDR quartiles, operators were divided into group 1 with CDR < 10%, group 2 with CDR 10–17%, group 3 with CDR 17.1–26%, and group 4 with CDR > 26%. Detection rate of UGN was significantly higher in the group 4 in comparison to group 1 (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.2 − 9.0). In the multivariate regression model, patient age, male gender and operator’s CDR > 26% were independent risk factors of UGN detection (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 − 1.05, OR 2; 95% CI 1.2 − 3.5, and OR 5.7 95% CI 1.5 − 22.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The CDR is associated with the detection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms. This parameter may be a useful quality measure of EGD to be applied in general setting. Springer Nature Singapore 2021-05-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8280029/ /pubmed/33934197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-021-01790-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article—Alimentary Tract Romańczyk, Marcin Ostrowski, Bartosz Marek, Tomasz Romańczyk, Tomasz Błaszczyńska, Małgorzata Budzyń, Krzysztof Bugajski, Maciej Koziej, Mateusz Kajor, Maciej Januszewski, Krzysztof Zajęcki, Wojciech Waluga, Marek Hartleb, Marek Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia |
title | Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia |
title_full | Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia |
title_fullStr | Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia |
title_full_unstemmed | Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia |
title_short | Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia |
title_sort | composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia |
topic | Original Article—Alimentary Tract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-021-01790-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romanczykmarcin compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT ostrowskibartosz compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT marektomasz compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT romanczyktomasz compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT błaszczynskamałgorzata compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT budzynkrzysztof compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT bugajskimaciej compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT koziejmateusz compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT kajormaciej compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT januszewskikrzysztof compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT zajeckiwojciech compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT walugamarek compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia AT hartlebmarek compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia |