Cargando…

Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used diagnostic method with no widely accepted quality measure. We assessed quality indicator—composite detection rate (CDR)—consisting of detection of at least one of the following: cervical inlet patch, gastric polyp and post-ulcer duodenal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romańczyk, Marcin, Ostrowski, Bartosz, Marek, Tomasz, Romańczyk, Tomasz, Błaszczyńska, Małgorzata, Budzyń, Krzysztof, Bugajski, Maciej, Koziej, Mateusz, Kajor, Maciej, Januszewski, Krzysztof, Zajęcki, Wojciech, Waluga, Marek, Hartleb, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-021-01790-3
_version_ 1783722566558416896
author Romańczyk, Marcin
Ostrowski, Bartosz
Marek, Tomasz
Romańczyk, Tomasz
Błaszczyńska, Małgorzata
Budzyń, Krzysztof
Bugajski, Maciej
Koziej, Mateusz
Kajor, Maciej
Januszewski, Krzysztof
Zajęcki, Wojciech
Waluga, Marek
Hartleb, Marek
author_facet Romańczyk, Marcin
Ostrowski, Bartosz
Marek, Tomasz
Romańczyk, Tomasz
Błaszczyńska, Małgorzata
Budzyń, Krzysztof
Bugajski, Maciej
Koziej, Mateusz
Kajor, Maciej
Januszewski, Krzysztof
Zajęcki, Wojciech
Waluga, Marek
Hartleb, Marek
author_sort Romańczyk, Marcin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used diagnostic method with no widely accepted quality measure. We assessed quality indicator—composite detection rate (CDR)—consisting of detection of at least one of the following: cervical inlet patch, gastric polyp and post-ulcer duodenal bulb deformation. The aim of the study was to validate CDR according to detection rate of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms (UGN). METHODS: It was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted from January 2019 to October 2019. The endoscopic reports from 2896 symptomatic patients who underwent diagnostic EGD were analyzed. The EGDs were performed in three endoscopy units located in tertiary university hospital, private outpatient clinic and local hospital. RESULTS: 64 UGNs were detected. The mean CDR was 21.9%. The CDR correlated with UGN detection rate (R = 0.49, p = 0.045). Based on CDR quartiles, operators were divided into group 1 with CDR < 10%, group 2 with CDR 10–17%, group 3 with CDR 17.1–26%, and group 4 with CDR > 26%. Detection rate of UGN was significantly higher in the group 4 in comparison to group 1 (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.2 − 9.0). In the multivariate regression model, patient age, male gender and operator’s CDR > 26% were independent risk factors of UGN detection (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 − 1.05, OR 2; 95% CI 1.2 − 3.5, and OR 5.7 95% CI 1.5 − 22.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The CDR is associated with the detection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms. This parameter may be a useful quality measure of EGD to be applied in general setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8280029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82800292021-07-20 Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia Romańczyk, Marcin Ostrowski, Bartosz Marek, Tomasz Romańczyk, Tomasz Błaszczyńska, Małgorzata Budzyń, Krzysztof Bugajski, Maciej Koziej, Mateusz Kajor, Maciej Januszewski, Krzysztof Zajęcki, Wojciech Waluga, Marek Hartleb, Marek J Gastroenterol Original Article—Alimentary Tract BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used diagnostic method with no widely accepted quality measure. We assessed quality indicator—composite detection rate (CDR)—consisting of detection of at least one of the following: cervical inlet patch, gastric polyp and post-ulcer duodenal bulb deformation. The aim of the study was to validate CDR according to detection rate of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms (UGN). METHODS: It was a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted from January 2019 to October 2019. The endoscopic reports from 2896 symptomatic patients who underwent diagnostic EGD were analyzed. The EGDs were performed in three endoscopy units located in tertiary university hospital, private outpatient clinic and local hospital. RESULTS: 64 UGNs were detected. The mean CDR was 21.9%. The CDR correlated with UGN detection rate (R = 0.49, p = 0.045). Based on CDR quartiles, operators were divided into group 1 with CDR < 10%, group 2 with CDR 10–17%, group 3 with CDR 17.1–26%, and group 4 with CDR > 26%. Detection rate of UGN was significantly higher in the group 4 in comparison to group 1 (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.2 − 9.0). In the multivariate regression model, patient age, male gender and operator’s CDR > 26% were independent risk factors of UGN detection (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 − 1.05, OR 2; 95% CI 1.2 − 3.5, and OR 5.7 95% CI 1.5 − 22.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The CDR is associated with the detection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms. This parameter may be a useful quality measure of EGD to be applied in general setting. Springer Nature Singapore 2021-05-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8280029/ /pubmed/33934197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-021-01790-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article—Alimentary Tract
Romańczyk, Marcin
Ostrowski, Bartosz
Marek, Tomasz
Romańczyk, Tomasz
Błaszczyńska, Małgorzata
Budzyń, Krzysztof
Bugajski, Maciej
Koziej, Mateusz
Kajor, Maciej
Januszewski, Krzysztof
Zajęcki, Wojciech
Waluga, Marek
Hartleb, Marek
Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia
title Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia
title_full Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia
title_fullStr Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia
title_full_unstemmed Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia
title_short Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia
title_sort composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia
topic Original Article—Alimentary Tract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-021-01790-3
work_keys_str_mv AT romanczykmarcin compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT ostrowskibartosz compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT marektomasz compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT romanczyktomasz compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT błaszczynskamałgorzata compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT budzynkrzysztof compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT bugajskimaciej compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT koziejmateusz compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT kajormaciej compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT januszewskikrzysztof compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT zajeckiwojciech compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT walugamarek compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia
AT hartlebmarek compositedetectionrateasanuppergastrointestinalendoscopyqualitymeasurecorrelatingwithdetectionofneoplasia