Cargando…

Combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide for patients with methylated MGMT (m-MGMT) glioblastoma: results of computational biological modeling to predict the magnitude of treatment benefit

BACKGROUND: A randomized trial in glioblastoma patients with methylated-MGMT (m-MGMT) found an improvement in median survival of 16.7 months for combination therapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and lomustine, however the approach remains controversial and relatively under-utilized. Therefore, we sought t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castro, Michael, Pampana, Anusha, Alam, Aftab, Parashar, Rajan, Rajagopalan, Swaminathan, Lala, Deepak Anil, Roy, Kunal Ghosh Ghosh, Basu, Sayani, Prakash, Annapoorna, Nair, Prashant, Joseph, Vishwas, Agarwal, Ashish, G, Poornachandra, Behura, Liptimayee, Kulkarni, Shruthi, Choudhary, Nikita Ray, Kapoor, Shweta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03780-0
_version_ 1783722568553857024
author Castro, Michael
Pampana, Anusha
Alam, Aftab
Parashar, Rajan
Rajagopalan, Swaminathan
Lala, Deepak Anil
Roy, Kunal Ghosh Ghosh
Basu, Sayani
Prakash, Annapoorna
Nair, Prashant
Joseph, Vishwas
Agarwal, Ashish
G, Poornachandra
Behura, Liptimayee
Kulkarni, Shruthi
Choudhary, Nikita Ray
Kapoor, Shweta
author_facet Castro, Michael
Pampana, Anusha
Alam, Aftab
Parashar, Rajan
Rajagopalan, Swaminathan
Lala, Deepak Anil
Roy, Kunal Ghosh Ghosh
Basu, Sayani
Prakash, Annapoorna
Nair, Prashant
Joseph, Vishwas
Agarwal, Ashish
G, Poornachandra
Behura, Liptimayee
Kulkarni, Shruthi
Choudhary, Nikita Ray
Kapoor, Shweta
author_sort Castro, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A randomized trial in glioblastoma patients with methylated-MGMT (m-MGMT) found an improvement in median survival of 16.7 months for combination therapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and lomustine, however the approach remains controversial and relatively under-utilized. Therefore, we sought to determine whether comprehensive genomic analysis can predict which patients would derive large, intermediate, or negligible benefits from the combination compared to single agent chemotherapy. METHODS: Comprehensive genomic information from 274 newly diagnosed patients with methylated-MGMT glioblastoma (GBM) was downloaded from TCGA. Mutation and copy number changes were input into a computational biologic model to create an avatar of disease behavior and the malignant phenotypes representing hallmark behavior of cancers. In silico responses to TMZ, lomustine, and combination treatment were biosimulated. Efficacy scores representing the effect of treatment for each treatment strategy were generated and compared to each other to ascertain the differential benefit in drug response. RESULTS: Differential benefits for each drug were identified, including strong, modest-intermediate, negligible, and deleterious (harmful) effects for subgroups of patients. Similarly, the benefits of combination therapy ranged from synergy, little or negligible benefit, and deleterious effects compared to single agent approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of combination chemotherapy is predicted to vary widely in the population. Biosimulation appears to be a useful tool to address the disease heterogeneity, drug response, and the relevance of particular clinical trials observations to individual patients. Biosimulation has potential to spare some patients the experience of over-treatment while identifying patients uniquely situated to benefit from combination treatment. Validation of this new artificial intelligence tool is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03780-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8280043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82800432021-07-20 Combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide for patients with methylated MGMT (m-MGMT) glioblastoma: results of computational biological modeling to predict the magnitude of treatment benefit Castro, Michael Pampana, Anusha Alam, Aftab Parashar, Rajan Rajagopalan, Swaminathan Lala, Deepak Anil Roy, Kunal Ghosh Ghosh Basu, Sayani Prakash, Annapoorna Nair, Prashant Joseph, Vishwas Agarwal, Ashish G, Poornachandra Behura, Liptimayee Kulkarni, Shruthi Choudhary, Nikita Ray Kapoor, Shweta J Neurooncol Laboratory Investigation BACKGROUND: A randomized trial in glioblastoma patients with methylated-MGMT (m-MGMT) found an improvement in median survival of 16.7 months for combination therapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and lomustine, however the approach remains controversial and relatively under-utilized. Therefore, we sought to determine whether comprehensive genomic analysis can predict which patients would derive large, intermediate, or negligible benefits from the combination compared to single agent chemotherapy. METHODS: Comprehensive genomic information from 274 newly diagnosed patients with methylated-MGMT glioblastoma (GBM) was downloaded from TCGA. Mutation and copy number changes were input into a computational biologic model to create an avatar of disease behavior and the malignant phenotypes representing hallmark behavior of cancers. In silico responses to TMZ, lomustine, and combination treatment were biosimulated. Efficacy scores representing the effect of treatment for each treatment strategy were generated and compared to each other to ascertain the differential benefit in drug response. RESULTS: Differential benefits for each drug were identified, including strong, modest-intermediate, negligible, and deleterious (harmful) effects for subgroups of patients. Similarly, the benefits of combination therapy ranged from synergy, little or negligible benefit, and deleterious effects compared to single agent approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of combination chemotherapy is predicted to vary widely in the population. Biosimulation appears to be a useful tool to address the disease heterogeneity, drug response, and the relevance of particular clinical trials observations to individual patients. Biosimulation has potential to spare some patients the experience of over-treatment while identifying patients uniquely situated to benefit from combination treatment. Validation of this new artificial intelligence tool is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03780-0. Springer US 2021-06-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8280043/ /pubmed/34101093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03780-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Laboratory Investigation
Castro, Michael
Pampana, Anusha
Alam, Aftab
Parashar, Rajan
Rajagopalan, Swaminathan
Lala, Deepak Anil
Roy, Kunal Ghosh Ghosh
Basu, Sayani
Prakash, Annapoorna
Nair, Prashant
Joseph, Vishwas
Agarwal, Ashish
G, Poornachandra
Behura, Liptimayee
Kulkarni, Shruthi
Choudhary, Nikita Ray
Kapoor, Shweta
Combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide for patients with methylated MGMT (m-MGMT) glioblastoma: results of computational biological modeling to predict the magnitude of treatment benefit
title Combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide for patients with methylated MGMT (m-MGMT) glioblastoma: results of computational biological modeling to predict the magnitude of treatment benefit
title_full Combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide for patients with methylated MGMT (m-MGMT) glioblastoma: results of computational biological modeling to predict the magnitude of treatment benefit
title_fullStr Combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide for patients with methylated MGMT (m-MGMT) glioblastoma: results of computational biological modeling to predict the magnitude of treatment benefit
title_full_unstemmed Combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide for patients with methylated MGMT (m-MGMT) glioblastoma: results of computational biological modeling to predict the magnitude of treatment benefit
title_short Combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide for patients with methylated MGMT (m-MGMT) glioblastoma: results of computational biological modeling to predict the magnitude of treatment benefit
title_sort combination chemotherapy versus temozolomide for patients with methylated mgmt (m-mgmt) glioblastoma: results of computational biological modeling to predict the magnitude of treatment benefit
topic Laboratory Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03780-0
work_keys_str_mv AT castromichael combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT pampanaanusha combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT alamaftab combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT parasharrajan combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT rajagopalanswaminathan combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT laladeepakanil combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT roykunalghoshghosh combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT basusayani combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT prakashannapoorna combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT nairprashant combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT josephvishwas combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT agarwalashish combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT gpoornachandra combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT behuraliptimayee combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT kulkarnishruthi combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT choudharynikitaray combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit
AT kapoorshweta combinationchemotherapyversustemozolomideforpatientswithmethylatedmgmtmmgmtglioblastomaresultsofcomputationalbiologicalmodelingtopredictthemagnitudeoftreatmentbenefit