Cargando…

Phase III Clinical Trials in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of Their Design and Interpretation

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is one of the most common subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide. Improved survival outcomes with rituximab-based therapy in clinical trials led to the establishment of rituximab-based immunochemotherapy as standard of care for first-line (1L) treatment of FL. In the GAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachy, Emmanuel, Rufibach, Kaspar, Parreira, Joana, Launonen, Aino, Nielsen, Tina, Hackshaw, Allan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34041708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01738-2
_version_ 1783722569472409600
author Bachy, Emmanuel
Rufibach, Kaspar
Parreira, Joana
Launonen, Aino
Nielsen, Tina
Hackshaw, Allan
author_facet Bachy, Emmanuel
Rufibach, Kaspar
Parreira, Joana
Launonen, Aino
Nielsen, Tina
Hackshaw, Allan
author_sort Bachy, Emmanuel
collection PubMed
description Follicular lymphoma (FL) is one of the most common subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide. Improved survival outcomes with rituximab-based therapy in clinical trials led to the establishment of rituximab-based immunochemotherapy as standard of care for first-line (1L) treatment of FL. In the GALLIUM trial, obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS), prolonged time-to-next antilymphoma treatment (TTNT) and comparable overall survival (OS) compared with rituximab-based immunochemotherapy as 1L treatment for FL. Using GALLIUM as an example, this article aims to explain how improved outcomes in 1L treatment of FL have changed the landscape for the design and interpretation of future trials. As approved therapies for 1L FL already achieve good responses, it is becoming more difficult to design trials that demonstrate further treatment benefits with the currently accepted primary endpoints. New endpoints are needed to reflect the long remission times, low relapse rates, and impact of subsequent therapies in FL. PFS is used as a primary efficacy endpoint in registrational clinical trials for indolent malignancies like FL, where improvement in OS is not always observed due to the large number of patients and long study duration required to demonstrate a clear survival benefit. However, there are limitations to using PFS as the primary endpoint. Other potential endpoints, including TTNT, progression of disease within 2 years, response rate, and minimal residual disease status are explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8280048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82800482021-07-20 Phase III Clinical Trials in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of Their Design and Interpretation Bachy, Emmanuel Rufibach, Kaspar Parreira, Joana Launonen, Aino Nielsen, Tina Hackshaw, Allan Adv Ther Review Follicular lymphoma (FL) is one of the most common subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide. Improved survival outcomes with rituximab-based therapy in clinical trials led to the establishment of rituximab-based immunochemotherapy as standard of care for first-line (1L) treatment of FL. In the GALLIUM trial, obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS), prolonged time-to-next antilymphoma treatment (TTNT) and comparable overall survival (OS) compared with rituximab-based immunochemotherapy as 1L treatment for FL. Using GALLIUM as an example, this article aims to explain how improved outcomes in 1L treatment of FL have changed the landscape for the design and interpretation of future trials. As approved therapies for 1L FL already achieve good responses, it is becoming more difficult to design trials that demonstrate further treatment benefits with the currently accepted primary endpoints. New endpoints are needed to reflect the long remission times, low relapse rates, and impact of subsequent therapies in FL. PFS is used as a primary efficacy endpoint in registrational clinical trials for indolent malignancies like FL, where improvement in OS is not always observed due to the large number of patients and long study duration required to demonstrate a clear survival benefit. However, there are limitations to using PFS as the primary endpoint. Other potential endpoints, including TTNT, progression of disease within 2 years, response rate, and minimal residual disease status are explored. Springer Healthcare 2021-05-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8280048/ /pubmed/34041708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01738-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Bachy, Emmanuel
Rufibach, Kaspar
Parreira, Joana
Launonen, Aino
Nielsen, Tina
Hackshaw, Allan
Phase III Clinical Trials in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of Their Design and Interpretation
title Phase III Clinical Trials in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of Their Design and Interpretation
title_full Phase III Clinical Trials in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of Their Design and Interpretation
title_fullStr Phase III Clinical Trials in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of Their Design and Interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Phase III Clinical Trials in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of Their Design and Interpretation
title_short Phase III Clinical Trials in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of Their Design and Interpretation
title_sort phase iii clinical trials in first-line follicular lymphoma: a review of their design and interpretation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34041708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01738-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bachyemmanuel phaseiiiclinicaltrialsinfirstlinefollicularlymphomaareviewoftheirdesignandinterpretation
AT rufibachkaspar phaseiiiclinicaltrialsinfirstlinefollicularlymphomaareviewoftheirdesignandinterpretation
AT parreirajoana phaseiiiclinicaltrialsinfirstlinefollicularlymphomaareviewoftheirdesignandinterpretation
AT launonenaino phaseiiiclinicaltrialsinfirstlinefollicularlymphomaareviewoftheirdesignandinterpretation
AT nielsentina phaseiiiclinicaltrialsinfirstlinefollicularlymphomaareviewoftheirdesignandinterpretation
AT hackshawallan phaseiiiclinicaltrialsinfirstlinefollicularlymphomaareviewoftheirdesignandinterpretation