Analgesic effect of perineural local anesthetics, steroids, and conventional medical management for trauma and compression-related peripheral neuropathic pain: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Trauma and compression are common causes of peripheral neuropathic pain (NP) refractory to conventional medical management (CMM). The role of perineural interventions in relieving this type of pain is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this retrospective study were to determine the analgesic benefits of adding a combination of perineural local anesthetic and steroids (LA-S) to CMM compared with CMM alone in patients who had moderate-to-severe refractory NP after trauma to the ankle and the foot. METHODS: Health care records of 60 patients in exposed (3 injections of perineural LA-S at weekly intervals with CMM) and 60 in unexposed (CMM) cohorts were reviewed. Data on patient characteristics, pain, and mental and physical function were extracted at baseline and at the postintervention follow-up. Data were analyzed to evaluate analgesic benefit from the study interventions and the impact of baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Perineural LA-S with CMM cohort had lower pain numerical rating scale scores at 1 to 3 months after the intervention as compared to the CMM alone cohort (5.50 [interquartile range 4.00–7.00] and 7.00 [interquartile range 5.00–8.00], respectively; P < 0.01). However, multivariable analysis did not show an independent beneficial analgesic effect with the addition of perineural LA-S to CMM compared with CMM alone. A greater severity of preintervention catastrophizing (each unit increase in pain catastrophizing score increased pain score at follow-up by 0.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.01–0.07) was associated with reduction in the analgesic benefit. CONCLUSION: Perineural local anesthetic and steroid injections do not confer an analgesic benefit for trauma- or compression-related peripheral NP.