Cargando…
The criteria used by key decision makers in Australia to judge the academic quality of NTROs
Thirty experts in the assessment of the quality of Non-Traditional Research Outputs (NTROs) as academic research outputs were asked to rate the importance of 19 criteria that might be used in making these judgements. Analysis of responses identified four criteria where there is substantial agreement...
Autor principal: | McKee, Alan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280536/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20921565 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Judging quality of current septic shock definitions and criteria
por: Shankar-Hari, Manu, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The Decision of Judge Townsend
Publicado: (1900) -
Judging Statistical Models of Individual Decision Making under Risk Using In- and Out-of-Sample Criteria
por: Drichoutis, Andreas C., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Key Elements for Judging the Quality of a Risk Assessment
por: Fenner-Crisp, Penelope A., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reflections from Key Policy Decision-makers on Integrated Care and the Value of Decision-maker Involvement in Research
por: Evison, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)