Cargando…

Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review

BACKGROUND: Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities’ ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berg, Siv Hilde, O’Hara, Jane K., Shortt, Marie Therese, Thune, Henriette, Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten, Lungu, Daniel Adrian, Røislien, Jo, Wiig, Siri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34266403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3
_version_ 1783722661901238272
author Berg, Siv Hilde
O’Hara, Jane K.
Shortt, Marie Therese
Thune, Henriette
Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten
Lungu, Daniel Adrian
Røislien, Jo
Wiig, Siri
author_facet Berg, Siv Hilde
O’Hara, Jane K.
Shortt, Marie Therese
Thune, Henriette
Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten
Lungu, Daniel Adrian
Røislien, Jo
Wiig, Siri
author_sort Berg, Siv Hilde
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities’ ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different modes of communication used by health authorities in health risk communication with the public during a pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for publications in English from January 2009 through October 2020, covering both the full H1N1 pandemic and the response phase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search resulted in 1440 records, of which 48 studies met our eligibility criteria. RESULTS: The present review identified studies across a broad interdisciplinary field of health risk communication. The majority focused on the H1N1 pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. A content analysis of the studies identified three categories for modes of communication: i) communication channels, ii) source credibility and iii) how the message is communicated. The identified studies on social media focused mainly on content and engagement, while studies on the effect of the use of social media and self-protective behaviour were lacking. Studies on the modes of communication that take the diversity of receivers in the field into account are lacking. A limited number of studies of health authorities’ use of graphic and audio-visual means were identified, yet these did not consider/evaluate creative communication choices. CONCLUSION: Experimental studies that investigate the effect of health authorities’ videos and messages on social media platforms and self-protective behaviour are needed. More studies are needed across the fields of health risk communication and media studies, including visual communication, web design, video and digital marketing, at a time when online digital communication is central to reaching the public. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8280576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82805762021-07-19 Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review Berg, Siv Hilde O’Hara, Jane K. Shortt, Marie Therese Thune, Henriette Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten Lungu, Daniel Adrian Røislien, Jo Wiig, Siri BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities’ ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different modes of communication used by health authorities in health risk communication with the public during a pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for publications in English from January 2009 through October 2020, covering both the full H1N1 pandemic and the response phase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search resulted in 1440 records, of which 48 studies met our eligibility criteria. RESULTS: The present review identified studies across a broad interdisciplinary field of health risk communication. The majority focused on the H1N1 pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. A content analysis of the studies identified three categories for modes of communication: i) communication channels, ii) source credibility and iii) how the message is communicated. The identified studies on social media focused mainly on content and engagement, while studies on the effect of the use of social media and self-protective behaviour were lacking. Studies on the modes of communication that take the diversity of receivers in the field into account are lacking. A limited number of studies of health authorities’ use of graphic and audio-visual means were identified, yet these did not consider/evaluate creative communication choices. CONCLUSION: Experimental studies that investigate the effect of health authorities’ videos and messages on social media platforms and self-protective behaviour are needed. More studies are needed across the fields of health risk communication and media studies, including visual communication, web design, video and digital marketing, at a time when online digital communication is central to reaching the public. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3. BioMed Central 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8280576/ /pubmed/34266403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Berg, Siv Hilde
O’Hara, Jane K.
Shortt, Marie Therese
Thune, Henriette
Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten
Lungu, Daniel Adrian
Røislien, Jo
Wiig, Siri
Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review
title Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review
title_full Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review
title_fullStr Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review
title_short Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review
title_sort health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34266403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bergsivhilde healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview
AT oharajanek healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview
AT shorttmarietherese healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview
AT thunehenriette healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview
AT brønnickkolbjørnkallesten healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview
AT lungudanieladrian healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview
AT røislienjo healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview
AT wiigsiri healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview