Cargando…
Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review
BACKGROUND: Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities’ ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34266403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3 |
_version_ | 1783722661901238272 |
---|---|
author | Berg, Siv Hilde O’Hara, Jane K. Shortt, Marie Therese Thune, Henriette Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten Lungu, Daniel Adrian Røislien, Jo Wiig, Siri |
author_facet | Berg, Siv Hilde O’Hara, Jane K. Shortt, Marie Therese Thune, Henriette Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten Lungu, Daniel Adrian Røislien, Jo Wiig, Siri |
author_sort | Berg, Siv Hilde |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities’ ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different modes of communication used by health authorities in health risk communication with the public during a pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for publications in English from January 2009 through October 2020, covering both the full H1N1 pandemic and the response phase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search resulted in 1440 records, of which 48 studies met our eligibility criteria. RESULTS: The present review identified studies across a broad interdisciplinary field of health risk communication. The majority focused on the H1N1 pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. A content analysis of the studies identified three categories for modes of communication: i) communication channels, ii) source credibility and iii) how the message is communicated. The identified studies on social media focused mainly on content and engagement, while studies on the effect of the use of social media and self-protective behaviour were lacking. Studies on the modes of communication that take the diversity of receivers in the field into account are lacking. A limited number of studies of health authorities’ use of graphic and audio-visual means were identified, yet these did not consider/evaluate creative communication choices. CONCLUSION: Experimental studies that investigate the effect of health authorities’ videos and messages on social media platforms and self-protective behaviour are needed. More studies are needed across the fields of health risk communication and media studies, including visual communication, web design, video and digital marketing, at a time when online digital communication is central to reaching the public. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8280576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82805762021-07-19 Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review Berg, Siv Hilde O’Hara, Jane K. Shortt, Marie Therese Thune, Henriette Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten Lungu, Daniel Adrian Røislien, Jo Wiig, Siri BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities’ ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different modes of communication used by health authorities in health risk communication with the public during a pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for publications in English from January 2009 through October 2020, covering both the full H1N1 pandemic and the response phase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search resulted in 1440 records, of which 48 studies met our eligibility criteria. RESULTS: The present review identified studies across a broad interdisciplinary field of health risk communication. The majority focused on the H1N1 pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. A content analysis of the studies identified three categories for modes of communication: i) communication channels, ii) source credibility and iii) how the message is communicated. The identified studies on social media focused mainly on content and engagement, while studies on the effect of the use of social media and self-protective behaviour were lacking. Studies on the modes of communication that take the diversity of receivers in the field into account are lacking. A limited number of studies of health authorities’ use of graphic and audio-visual means were identified, yet these did not consider/evaluate creative communication choices. CONCLUSION: Experimental studies that investigate the effect of health authorities’ videos and messages on social media platforms and self-protective behaviour are needed. More studies are needed across the fields of health risk communication and media studies, including visual communication, web design, video and digital marketing, at a time when online digital communication is central to reaching the public. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3. BioMed Central 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8280576/ /pubmed/34266403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Berg, Siv Hilde O’Hara, Jane K. Shortt, Marie Therese Thune, Henriette Brønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten Lungu, Daniel Adrian Røislien, Jo Wiig, Siri Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review |
title | Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review |
title_full | Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review |
title_fullStr | Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review |
title_short | Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review |
title_sort | health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34266403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergsivhilde healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview AT oharajanek healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview AT shorttmarietherese healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview AT thunehenriette healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview AT brønnickkolbjørnkallesten healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview AT lungudanieladrian healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview AT røislienjo healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview AT wiigsiri healthauthoritieshealthriskcommunicationwiththepublicduringpandemicsarapidscopingreview |